Islamists stone and shoot dead mother and daughter

A group of armed men have stoned and shot dead a woman and her daughter in Afghanistan's Ghazni province, security officials have told the BBC.

The officials blamed the Taliban, who they said had accused the women of "moral deviation and adultery".

The police said two men had been arrested in connection with the murder.
The attack was only 300m from the governor's office in Ghazni city, which is on a list of places to be transferred to Afghan security control

Security officials said armed men entered the house where the young widow lived with her daughter and took them out to the yard, where they were initially stoned and then shot dead.

"Neighbours did not help or inform the authorities on time," an official said.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-15688354

 

But a certain person on this board is sure that the Taliban are freedom fighters, I will not mention the name of the person although although the object in his name can be seen up in the sky at night.

 

Afghanistan and Pakistan give us a view of what life during the Middle Ages must have been like.

 

Try as they may, the 'Islamists' will never catch up with the zionists and the US when it comes to killing people. Heil the world champs!

 

You should try to educate yourself on the subject instead of invoquing Goodwin's law in every thread that you come to. The muzzi already hold the record for attrocity commited against civilain, especially women and children by far this century.

 

That depends on how far back you start the death toll. It's hard to say exactly how many people Islamists killed in the Middle Ages.

Of course, they weren't called Islamists back then. Uniting religion and government was the norm for most of the world up until relatively recently.

Unfortunately, separating church and state isn't likely in a hellhole like Afghanistan.

 

All the evidence is that they killed very few people, whereas the Chiristians were killing like there was no tomorrow. Read up on the First Crusade, when the Pope tried to export European violence, just for a start. Afghanistan is constantly being attacked, as you know, which is what makes it a hellhole. The best government they ever had was overthrown by 'Islamists' armed and trained by the US, as you also know.

 

The christian crusades were a response to muslim invading europe...
Afghanistan has been a hell hole since the time of Alexander...

They never had anything approaching a democracy and it was the russian who deposed their last real government, not the US.

 

Islam spread through conquest just like Christianity did. No religion has a monopoly on that. It is rather convenient that the record keeping of the Islamic World was often "edited for favorability", but there are enough accounts from outside of the applicable areas to indicate the killing involved.

As for our past support for Islamists, I have to agree that was a massive mistake and one that we (and NATO) seem to be repeating in Libya.

 

What?! Ok....you must have a tally, right? Well...let's have it!

 

Islamic control spread through battle, as did the Empires that attacked Arabia, but Islam didn't - their leaders lost on taxes when people turned to Islam. Nor did Christianity spread by conquest at that time - that was a later development. Class societies use war to increase the take of the rulers, but it they need quite a time to corrupt religions. Our view of religion is based on the time when they'd succeeded in doing so.

 

I don't think you quite understand the way its tallied. In this case the death talllies as one at the hands of USA/Nato/Zionists since like all killings in Afghanistan it is their fault having invaded/occupied. Likewise in Iraq. Now you know how it works are you in agreement with Iolo?

 

Well, read Tyrerik. There's no question about it, not on any figures I've ever heard of. Afghanistan and Iraq and Somalia and Lebanon and Libya never attacked America, as you know, nor have the Palestinians killed, for instance 2,000 Occupation children.

What point do you want to make here? Can you seriously argue that anyone has killed more people than the USA in the Middle East, at least for a very long time? I am not into these American games of appeal to Wikipedia - I just read the news and watch and listen to it on various stations. Try not to be pointlessly faux-naif.

 

Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidences. Where are yours? Beside what you read in pro arab news sources and hear at your local mosque

 

A horrible act, although un-Islamic.

 

If that's actually the measure he's using, then there's really no point in discussing it further.

It is extremely myopic to blame deaths incurred by insurgents on us.

 

First; as you know, the crusades were in response to the muslims attacking the holy Land. Then we all know that islam was forced on the Arabs at the point of a sword after many people died at the hands of Mo's thieves.

Are you saying that the communist government was better than the government that they had before that?? You surly know that the Marxist revolution killed over a million Afghans. Then there was the Afghan civil war launched by the Taliban where many more Afghans were killed. Now they are still killing their fellow Afghans faster than we are. The Taliban gets credit for 80% of the deaths in Afghanistan.

 

I might just agree that the modern-day Islamists are about as barbaric as the medieval Crusaders were a millennium ago. Perhaps in 1,000 years Islam will become a civilized humane religion but we won't last that long and don't have the luxury of waiting, we have to deal with them today based on what they represent today - medieval savagery, oppression, barbarism, close-mindedness, aggression, intolerance, fanaticism.

 

Any tactic that forces you to avoid condemning an atrocity in the present with equivocation in the past - regardless how accurate or in error - really diminishes you as a moral authority on anything.

 

More like the Bronze Age.



_

 

Isn't it good that after 10 years war in Afghanistan, the country is so much better than it was before the west invaded.

I also find it surprising that stoning only began when Islam was founded.

 

Why can't we stone all these Islamo Facists back to the Stone Age where they really belong?

I'll be the first!

 

So, internet hero, you show your compassion to the women being stoned by promoting blowing them up to bits instead. Good one!

 

Wow, two strawman in two line... Quite an achievement...

 

Uncle Ferd says, "Yea...

... dat's Islam...

... the 'peaceful' religion.