It time Trump fights back

It just proves that the Obama/Holder/Lynch DOJ was profoundly corrupt. "Clean administration" is an oxymoron.

 

Assumes extremist alt right factoids NOT in evidence.

 

I guess that explains why Obama's Information Czar { Cass Sunstein } implored
that the greatest question that need be asked is - Was Alger Hiss a Spy ? -.
And of course he was.That explains why those in the MSM refuse to ask
or answer that question.Because they know the answer is very relevant.
Obama had built an entire Political/Bureaucratic Aristocracy within Washington D.C.
And one of Obama's Biggest support groups was - Communist Party USA -.
They actually took credit for Obama's 2012 Presidential victory.
- Occupy Wall Street - were actually Commies.The democrat type.
The huge takeway was when Michele Bachmann made her first appearance
on - Hardball - in 2008.She was interested in having a Media Expose done
on those in Congress.To explore their true Patriotism.Or lack thereof.
She was suspect about this Obama Nominee.Knowing he was never vetted.
Chris Matthews lost it.He became enraged.Miss Bachmann almost single-handidly
took all this Faux Grandier away from Obama ... this " supposed " phenomenal
Presidential Candidate.Matthews immediately mounted a campaign to raise
funds to have Michele Bachmann defeated in her Congressional direct.
Matthews in just a weekend managed to raise over a Million dollars
to have her unseated.
I think under Obama there may be Many,many .... more Alger Hiss types
masquerating as if loyal patriots.
What else explains how and why the dems never dare mention the name
George Soros.The current Alger Hiss of out generation.

 

I guess that poster missed the Historic memo.
Attorney general Eric Holder was the Only active cabinet member
in American History to be found In Contempt of Congress.

 

Wow, you do realize this puts many on the left in a peculiar sort of light

 

trying to paint honest people as left is just childish

 

I just found the statement amusing, in a hypocritical sort of way

 

I'm sure, truly stated, and heartfelt by the writer.....

 

you oppose investigations? why do you support a cover up?

 

You keep playing coy and I'll keep pasting your silly statement until it dawns on you what you said

 

Nothing works better than staffing your DOJ with scofflaw criminals when you need to cover up official crimes. Of course, the corrupt Congressional Republicans are always willing to help. For instance, why wasn't Lerner given limited use immunity to compel her testimony after she took the 5th?

The corrupt entrenched bipartisan ruling political class is unified in its defense of official crime.

 

Not quite. This was information given by our allies and was so secret that it was above top secret and considered "code-word." It was so secret it wasn't even being shared with our allies and seemed to have involved Isreali information about ISIS. Yet Trump tells our greatest geo-political foe in the same room as the Russian media. By the way, the Russians aren't working with us, they are just protecting Assad and are barely doing anything about ISIS just the rebels. They are also friends with Iran and China and can leak that info to them.

Usually top secret information is only divulged after it is first reviewed and cleared by intelligence and then passed from our intelligence to their intelligence, and if it came from another country we let them know whats going on. If not you risk putting agents at risk or divulging information that can actually be used against you. You see, allies give is their secrets because they trust us with them and when we just give it to the friends of their enemies that hurts trust and our ability to collect information.

 

Yeah, according to your unnamed source.

According to the people in the room that's not the case, who have gone on record with what occurred.

The information was about undetectable laptop/electronics bombs going off on civilian airliners, something that flights had already started banning so clearly that information was already being acted on and disseminated.

I don't care what countries obtain that information. No country should be subjected to civilian airline terrorism and bombs going off at 20,000 feet in an airliner.

Besides, your unnamed sources and people reporting this are constantly being proven wrong.

I'll trust the guy that at least has the guts to stand up there at a podium and tell us to our faces what actually happened.

This is just another in a long line of liberal media stories trying to spin things and smear the POTUS. We see it every day.

 

This official is Donald Trump himself:
"As President I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining to terrorism and airline flight safety. Humanitarian reasons, plus I want Russia to greatly step up their fight against ISIS & terrorism."

How do you know this information is about what you claim? You are not a security expert and not the one to make the call over whether it should be provided to our geo-political foe in front of the Russian Media.

The point is that its not the presidents job to provide top secret information to our rivals on the fly, that what we have intelligence for. They will assess and provide that information to other nation's intelligence when they see appropriate.

 

Actually how do you know I'm not a security expert? Hm.

1. The meeting was held to discuss threats to civilian aviation
2. The POTUS gave them information regarding laptop bombs on civilian airplanes
3. The POTUS has the legal authority to share that information as he sees fit
4. You don't know that it was Top Secret
5. It is the POTUS job, as well as being morally and ethically justified, and clearly doesn't represent a threat to the US to share civilian air line threats

Should he just have let ISIS board Russian civilian airliners with laptop bombs?

Would you have liked that?