Johnson Intended To Stop Ukraine Aid, Not Pass An Immigration Bill

Obviously you don't, republicans have said good things about it... Trumpism killed it as they want this issue to remain a issue

 

Bullshit! That bill had nothing for us. It allowed 1.8 million illegals to enter the country every year. THIS Republican wanted no parts of it. Republicans who did want it were RINOs like Mitt Romney and senile Mitch McConnell.

 

republicans said, no, we can't support a emergency shutdown of the border at 5000, we need an open border for 2024, Trump needs it

 

Yes, I know you would like to have only one American political party. You have repeatedly made that quite clear.

 

I'm trying to figure out how one can be so confused with a concept that is literally spelled out in words.
I think what is apparent is that some believe in an alternate reality, where what they want to be true is true.
See if you can follow along:
From the OP article: "In November 2023, Johnson stated the House would not vote on aid to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan unless it included H.R. 2"
Then "Johnson likely could not believe his good fortune when Republican senators adopted the meme and declared that any foreign assistance bill needed significant provisions to address illegal immigration. Some would argue the Biden administration made a mistake by including border funds in its national security supplemental spending request since it appeared to give tacit approval to connect the two issues, pointed out Zolan Kanno-Youngs of the New York Times."
Then "On February 13, 2024, the Senate passed on a 70-29 vote a bill to provide aid to Ukraine and Israel without immigration provisions. However, after Speaker Johnson declared a foreign assistance bill with the Senate-negotiated immigration measures would be dead in the House, he said the Senate-passed bill without immigration provisions also would be dead."
Hence my supposition in the OP, that they were, imo, doing Trump's bidding and, by extension, helping Putin by tanking anything to do with helping Ukraine.
I don't doubt that there are opposing opinions about that part, but you guys are screwing up the basic facts of the case. Honestly, have fun!

 

I support a bipartisan deal

 

So in all that, you just conveniently didn't include, Democrats came forth with allowing 1.8 million illegals per year.
And magically, by Republicans refusing to allow 1.8 million illegals into the US, (which you conveniently forgot to include) they are doing Trumps bidding.
We call those types of claims, Propaganda.

 

Nope, sorry. Wrong as per usual

 

They neither wanted what they got nor supported it, and Trump had nothing to do with it.

 

I bet you can't even find the bill to post it

 

No, you support a Democrat deal that gives you everything you think you want, giving nothing in return.

 

Funny how democrats require money to a foreign country to support their own.

 

so you support the bill?

 

If I say I want a book in exchange for a dollar it means you're trading one thing for the other.

It's not "tying them together".

 

lol, sure

 

fell free to post it if you wish

 

like repubs, dems do not have a super majority, so we have to work together, in a bipartisan manner to get anything done

 

Like I said, you couldn't even find the bill to post it if you had too
Thanks for verifying
Much less know what it says

 

funny how Trumpism doesn't support their own, they would damage Americans for the Golden Calf

 

You're welcome to explain how Republicans in the house voted to pass it and how someone who isn't POTUS had anything to do with it while you're busy laughing.

 

it was a bipartisan deal

 

More gibberish pulled from the emotional center of the brain.

 

feel free to post it, oh, don't you have it?

 

If it was, then it would have passed a vote.

Did it pass a vote in the Republican led house?

 

Its like talking to cabbage