July, 2915 hottest on record

it means the article is wrong

you obviously don't understand what constitutes proof

 

I'd say it is you who has no inkling of an idea of what proof is. And you claimed facts, facts which I claim are not in evidence. So, until you provide such facts, then it is you who doesn't understand the word.

 

LOL, there are two new papers out on ocean warming and with the existing huge uncertainties, there is no definitive evidence the warming is 'hiding' in the oceans. Your opinion is invalid.

 

Anyone or anything that disagrees with you or your premise is either simply wrong or we are too dumb, where is our premise is were all too dumb on this matter so its a waste of time and energy to pursue it costing us billions of dollars. If you were truly worried about saving human life you would be trying to spread the use of fossil fuels to the third world not prevent it.

 

you're making up fairy tales again, it's not about me

it's about science, facts, evidence, logic and reason

 

wash, rinse, repeat......You have no facts, please stop posting such nonsense. You know not what you post. And you have no facts. I'll repeat as I stated, show me your facts. You keep writing the word, but have no idea what it means since you haven't provided any facts.

By the way, it is logical to ask for facts.

 

what a joke, you're projecting your own situation

despite your dishonest denials, there are facts:

 

So I've asked you before, what does this prove? What do these facts tell you? Can't you explain what it means? In your own words? So you're posting links on subjects you are clueless about. I see. So you have no facts again with the rinse and repeat. I didn't see any wash this time.

 

On top of that, he posts old information and like his first link that states, "Many lines of scientific evidence show the Earth's climate is changing. This page presents the latest information from several independent measures of observed climate change that illustrate an overwhelmingly compelling story of a planet that is undergoing global warming."

What he doesn't realize is that those 'several independent measures' all come from the same data set and all adopted the Karl et. al. pause buster change that took the good Argo float temperature record and adjusted it up to match the more alarmist desirable ship engine intake temperatures to make the inconvenient pause go away.

Then he just repeats the same thing over and over again and says you are wrong.

Thus: Wash, rinse, repeat.

 

LOL, I just want him to explain what he thinks. And he posts that crap like it's attached to his fingertips,

 

Well, he thinks you are wrong and that is about all he can articulate.

 

I didn't state anything. So I'd have to ask him what am I wrong about? he is the one pumping out all the adhominems and stating fact and evidence and all of that. Me, I just said state a fact. one to which he still hasn't.

 

Doesn't matter, it is like a broken record.

 

Don't we know it.

 

it tells me agw is real and you're dishonest

 

what tells you agw is real? dude that is the question. What tells you it's real, because it got warmer? Really, that's what you're going with?

 

this is all wrong, i reposted the video several times

it's a question i've answered many times, you won't acknowledge the facts

 

[video=youtube;6D7HKG1hBcM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6D7HKG1hBcM[/video]

That you have

 

of course you can't make a logical reply, your comments are a joke

 

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. You simply post the same crap over and over with little to no input of your own. I doubt you even understand half of what your quoting. I at least admit Im dumb

 

i post facts from credible sources like nasa and noaa

you post ridiculous garbage and outright lies


"Arctic sea ice reached its annual minimum extent on Sept. 11, according to the Boulder, Colorado based National Snow and Ice Data Center — and only three years on record have seen a minimum ice extent that was lower than this one: 2007, 2011 and the record-holder, 2012."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/09/15/arctic-sea-ice-just-hit-its-annual-low-and-it-was-the-fourth-lowest-on-record/

 

You post facts that you don't even understand as you seem to have no scientific back round . How about explaining things in your own words.

 

you're projecting your own situation

evidence shows that arctic ice extents are consistently at record low levels

 

Global sea ice is pretty much following the mean. This is supposed to be global warming you know.

 

Kelly where are you? dude, you post links, but there are no facts. See that's your dilemma, you think there is something in the link you provide, and you can't explain what it is you think you're providing. Tell us, educate us instead of repeating yourself over and over and over again.