July, 2915 hottest on record

that's completely false

 

WHAT? What the heck are you stating? Dude, you know nothing about the state of the Arctic. You can only pass along someone elses view and because you, you have no idea. I have no idea. The cryosphere is the only place and they haven't been up for some time, since July I think it was.

Did you take a recent trip 100 years ago and see where the ice was? Admit you have no idea, like we have no idea. someone wrote something and you are using it.

- - - Updated - - -

repeat, then post up what is a friggin fact. I've asked and asked and still you have a trolling one line answer. No you wish to come on a message board and claim yourself almighty, then prove it. Explain what is factual in what links you provided?

 

the truth, as opposed to your false statements and ludicrous assertions

 

How old are you? I have a reason for asking.

 

Yes or no? Is there a worldwide conspiracy amoung scientists. "I have a reason for asking". The reason is that you have refused to answer this simple question. And don't say you have already answered because it is a yes or no question and you have dodged this question so far by typing out all kinds of crap besides yes or no.

 

i'll be 57 in december

 

Nah, you just don't like my explanation of what is going on so focus on something you think is clever, plus you keep telling us you can't possibly understand what is going on so why are you here?

 

Well, I have worked in computers since you were 15 and know a little bit about what computers can and cannot do. If you read the literature you would understand what is not modeled and cannot be modeled. You would also know that not one of the 100 or so models used agree with each other so they average them which has nothing to do with the climate. You would know they cannot model the two features on Earth that affect the weather the most, the PDO and AMO. You would know that the models do not hind cast well at all and are curve fitted to get close. You would also know the models are not validated. You would know that Mann's hockey stick is based on little data and an algorithm that heavily weights the few records that show any hockey stick feature and that red noise in gives a hockey stick output instead of red noise out as it should and that Mann had already known this as previous model runs did not give a hockey stick output. You should already know that all of this alarm is based on an untested hypothesis and those models and not on observed science..

 

i know that you don't know what you're talking about

 

Post limit thread closure

Shangrila
Moderator