Lila Rose Shares Why Abortion Supporters Want a Culture of Consequence-Free Sex

Why are you ok with state but not fed?

 

Is it? I'm sure it won't be hard to then quote something that I've written... oh wait. Never have I ever.. So why push this kind of lie in public?

 

OK, you want states to decide if women have the basic human right of bodily autonomy..... should states have the right to eliminate free speech?

Should the states decide if they have slavery ? Go to war ?

 

There is NO child murdered in abortion.... if there is DO call the police, it IS your civic duty.

There IS a correct answer....women have the same rights as anyone else.

 

That would be the burden of the patient.

 

We are a UNION OF STATES. People in different states have different thoughts, desires, morals and desires. I was born and raised in New York where people hate guns, love socialism and caress things like "Critical Race Theory". That sort of thinking doesn't work in many other states. I left California and retired elsewhere due to high state taxes, Darconian gun laws and CA's love of criminals and disdain for victims of violent crime. There are few things that are universally supported in all states. Abortions is a complex issue with varying arguments on both sides of it. It would seem impossible to get consensus in all 50 states. The voters in each state deciding seems like a very appropriate way to handle it.

 

You want women to have abortions but kill unborn children. Not everyone wants to kill tiny kids.
I see no connection to free speech or slavery in your support of killing the unborn children. Maybe you can answer a question for me. Why is this whole issue such a big deal when condoms, IUD's, diaphragms and birth control pills are so readily available?

 

Women certainly do have the same rights as anyone else. No one denies that.
Now, in certain states, the unborn will have the right to live too!

 

No lie. You want the govt to seize control of a womans body to prevent her from choosing to have an abortion.

 

.

 

Nope, we want women to be able to make that choice.

 

Ah nope that's not how it works.

 

You want omen to be able to make a choice to kill an unborn child. Millions of folks are more on the side of the child. Its a tough issue. That's why letting the voters decide the law is a good solution.

 

Or choose not to. and no its not a good solution.

 

There is no human being inside me. I'm a guy. Wait... are you one of those folks that think men can give birth?

 

Who else will speak for the unborn child? Certainly not the mother seeking to murder it.

 

So?

 

Why do you have a problem with a woman choosing to have an abortion but not the state?

 

So you DO think men can give birth?

 

Nope, where did I say that?

 

I have a problem with murdering an unborn child... period. But I understand the other side of the issue. Again, that's why its an appropriate thing to have voters decide.

 

Answer the question.

 

I just did. I have an opinion. You have an opinion. Let the voters decide.

 

Abortion, even on demand, does not create consequence-free sex. Abortion on demand is okay because the embryo and early fetus are not persons and do not have minds. Mindless things do not have interests or rights.

 

Why are you ok with voters deciding but NOT ok with the pregnant woman deciding?