Lock Her Up !!

Nope.

 

You as an an individual to spy on a other individual even on the internet that is called hacking and it's illegal.

 

Such a challanging response .. Sorry mate -- shaking your head going "Nope Nope Nope" - not going to make the nightmare into fairy tale .. not this Toad .. the documents don't lie .. but Hillary does .. habitually .. this whole plot .. not just Hillary .. the Blue clownshow in general - along with the bureaucratic sht show .. of kangaroo hieghts .. the world has rarely seen .. . talking first world here .. albeit the third world comparisons are apt.

Crooked from day one .. getting the cheat sheets for the debate - prior to debate with Bernie --- and what Hilly/DNC did to his movement .. quite disgusting full left media complicity .. takes a crook to know one I suppose .. should put Hilly in a cell right next to Carrot Top .. see what happens .. let nature take its course... but on hidden reality TV show camera ... got to keep the show going .. - keep you from having "bad thoughts" .. no no no Nope Nope Nope .. get ye behind me Satan .. banish that bad thought .. Its like the thought stopping mechanisms you see in religious cults .. of which much of the religious right belongs .. and never forget .. that my arguments against Red .. are way .. orders of magnitude .. better than yours .. aye mate "Nope"

 

The documents? They're misrepresented. It's Durham that's lying. He's desperate to have something to justify the millions of dollars he's spent and all the time he's wasted.

 

I think we, we being progressives, are going to have to be satisfied in the knowledge Durham's canard has been exposed as a fraud. Members of The Following will keep believing it no matter what despite.........

There were many problems with all this. For one, much of this was not new: The New York Times had reported in October what Mr. Sussmann had told the C.I.A. about data suggesting that Russian-made smartphones, called YotaPhones, had been connecting to networks at Trump Tower and the White House, among other places. The conservative media also skewed what the filing said. For example, Mr. Durham’s filing never used the word “infiltrate.” And it never claimed that Mr. Joffe’s company was being paid by the Clinton campaign.

Most important, contrary to the reporting, the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era. According to lawyers for David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the Yota analysis, the data — so-called DNS logs, which are records of when computers or smartphones have prepared to communicate with servers over the internet — came from Barack Obama’s presidency.

 

"Special Counsel John Durham filed a motion late last week which revealed that Hillary Clinton’s failed presidential campaign paid a technology company to “infiltrate” servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish a false link between Donald Trump and Russia"

Not misrepresented at all .. It is the motion that revealed the dirty deeds of Hillary ... not some opinion from Durham. Nice try at Ad Hom fallacy though - demonization of the messenger because you can't handle the message.

Are you claiming that Clinton did not pay a tech company to infiltrate servers belonging to Trump Tower - that the information released by the Gov't was "False" someone concocted the whole thing in some grand conspiracy to Frame Hillary ..

Yeah .. you go with that self delusion.

 

Simply not true. See post #29. Your habit of repeating fallacies has become troubling.

 

Read this:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/n...-probe-prompt-flawed-allegations-of-espionage

 

Don't post links without citation from link .. Read this https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew 5-7&version=NIV

 

You don't know what a fallacy is mate .. Which is why you do not state what the fallacy has been committed - as is figment of imagination.

What is this fallacy you are referring to ... Support your claim instead of name-calling - this is the adult room.

 

Thanks for providing more evidence of just how batshyte crazy the recent right wing media allegations are. Watching the gullible rubes lap it up is another example of how easily deceived RWM's audience is and how quickly lies are absorbed in to their deceitful narrative.

 

Look who disagrees with how this has been presented:

John Durham, the special counsel looking into the government's investigation of Russian election interference, distanced himself from reports in conservative media that a motion he filed last week implied Hillary Clinton's campaign paid to spy on Trump White House servers

In a filing Thursday, Durham disavowed responsibility for how the filing was interpreted: "If third parties or members of the media have overstated, understated or otherwise misinterpreted facts contained in the government’s motion, that does not in any way undermine the valid reasons for the government’s inclusion of this information."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/john-durham-distances-himself-wing-124812065.html

 

Kudos to Durham for deflating the lies of "third parties or members of the media."

 

Though fails to explain why they’re in the filing to begin with, Disingenuous.

 

How exactly should we interpret the Clinton Camp hacking White House Servers ?

 

So the man that many people believe was upright and honest is now not telling the truth?

 

When did he say that that happened? People are just making that assumption and assumptions can be flawed.

 

I think Durham has a theory that somehow the Clinton campaign was responsible for the FBI launching Crossfire Hurricane. A theory that's been debunked by Horowitz and the available evidence. But Billy the Bagman gave Durham an assignment. Keep digging until you find something to justify Trump's batshyte crazy claims. Almost 3 years later he's going to need another shovel cuz he keeps hitting a stone wall.

 

He didn't, cuz it didn't happen.

 

Your accusations of Trump are just political conjecture of course.

 

Maybe the timing will be after the November elections.

 

Why would he present even the most solid case to a Dept. of Justice that is now in the bag?

 

Its what the docucments say .. The White House was hacked by a Tech company who was paid by a Law Firm associated with Clinton - Clinton Campaign.

Thats not assumption -- those are the facts as we know them. Doesn't take Sherlock Holms to figure out this "Who dunnit" .

 

Perhaps you might want to familiarize yourself with the facts, and then the governing statutes that this company agreed to as part of their contract. One hopes that you don't have to live off of your nothing burger.......

 

Can I go with E: the same amount of time they gave Nixon?