Maine strips Trump from the ballot, inflaming legal war over his candidacy

Try and fail badly, you mean. It not only does not require a conviction, but Congress has not filled in the gaps to require a conviction either. You're making that up; it simply is not the law in any shape or form.

The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868. Jefferson Davis was "around" at the time, so according to your horrid interpretation, he was eligible to be on the ballot. Mayne do some research before making even more **** up?

 

Then why did the Pentagon order the NC Commander to stand down for 4 hours?

 

FALSE
And you know thats a false statement because I was very specific.

If you're going to make false statements about posters, maybe you shouldn't post at all.

 

Aren't you "cherry picking" which sources you're willing to consider? Poisoning the well gets old.

 

Really? Tell us which of the 4 justices in Colorado are Republican or independents?
When did the prosecutor and judge in Trumps civil trial change to Republican or independent?

Never said they didn't.
Next

Seems someone needs a refresher or additional education on political news highlights.

Biden's Theft of Classified Docs Is Serious. DOJ Isn't Taking It Seriously
https://www.newsweek.com/bidens-the...-doj-isnt-taking-it-seriously-opinion-1774837
Biden stole these classified documents before he left the Obama White House on January 20, 2017, and moved them at least once to his new Penn Biden office after its opening in February 2018.
The FBI searched Biden's home and found more classified documents
https://www.npr.org/2023/01/21/1150...dens-home-and-found-more-classified-documents

Where have you been?

Most likely in that convenient magical cave you live in. lol

 

There are many Democrats involved. He also never said "all" Democrats "all the time." This is an inaccurate explanation of his post.

 

Neither you, nor the …cough…”journalist”…cough…from Newsweek have provided any evidence that those documents were STOLEN. Yes, they were found in Biden’s residence, but they were returned as soon as they were discovered. There was no attempt to withhold them from that point, nor any attempt to obstruct the authorities.

The difference couldn’t be any plainer…

 

Except none of this was known until after Republicans captured the majority of the House with plans to more aggressively investigate the Biden crime family.

https://www.politifact.com/article/2023/jan/25/i-have-no-regrets-tracking-the-joe-biden-classifie/

 

Watching TV is not "engaging" in an insurrection.

 

Just a second ago you said Biden was never accused of steeling documents.
Like the Classified documents that can only be viewed in the SCIFF found in Bidens garage.

Now you need evidence they were stolen?
What did you think, the magic SCIFF fairy put them there.

 

Do try to READ before you attempt an embarrassing response.

I said that there is no evidence that they were STOLEN by Biden, I did NOT say that they weren’t found in his possession. Having something in your possession does not mean that you intentionally intend to steal it (note the correct spelling, by the way…).

This is why there was no charge in his case. The documents were promptly returned, once their presence was discovered. There was no attempt to subsequently hide them from authorities, nor did he obstruct the authorities from retrieving them…compare this with The Stain’s behaviour…

 

Riiiiight, They just magically leaped out of the our nations most secure, U.S. Department of Defense secure room, that guards against electronic surveillance and suppresses data leakage of sensitive military and security information, and found there way to Bidens house.
The left can be sold literally ANYTHING.

 

Now, do the honest thing and quote the rest of my post…!

 

You mean the garbage about, just because he had them, doesn't mean he stole them?
Please, you don't take anything out of the SCIF EVER. Everyone who go's into the SCIF know this. The only way to take something out is if you hide it. Biden has boxes of classified documents that he was never entitled to even have.
You will have to drink your own Koolaide by yourself because you can't sell that garbage here. lol

 

The only one shovelling garbage here is yourself…….educate yourself…


Claims misrepresent 1,850 boxes of Biden documents at Delaware university

CLAIM: President Joe Biden withheld 1,850 boxes of classified documents from his time as vice president.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The National Archives and Records Administration says the boxes of files referenced in that figure are actually Biden’s Senate papers, which are housed at the University of Delaware.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-biden-trump-delaware-1850-boxes-446929353071

No, Donald Trump's classified documents case is not like Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/don...nts-case-joe-biden-hillary/story?id=100011485


Biden, Trump – and two very different classified document scandals
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jan/20/classified-documents-biden-trump-explained

Remember, The Orange Stain was NOT charged with the 90+ documents that he DID return when requested. His crime is in retaining them and obstructing the authorities…something that Pence and Biden did NOT do….

 

You're pitiful convoluting won't work

Between November 2022 and January 2023, approximately 25 to 30 classified government documents were discovered in Bidens former office at the Penn Biden Center in Washington, D.C., and in his personal residence in Wilmington, Delaware, dating to his time in the Senate and his vice presidency in the Obama administration.

The classified documents included intelligence material and briefing memos on Ukraine, Iran and the United Kingdom. Then a second set was discovered at Biden's home on December 20, followed by several more on January 9 and January 12, 2023 containing classification markings during a consensual search of his home the previous day, some of which dated to his tenure in the Senate; investigators also seized some of Biden's handwritten notes from his vice presidency.

Nice try but no banana

 

That sounds like a load of ****.

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/...osefully-delayed-on-jan-6-final-report-finds/

 

Did Biden pretend that he didn't have them, hide them, order surveillance tapes destroyed, move them , fail to comply with subpoena?

 

Mate, your major problem is that you just don’t bloody read…!

Several times I have agreed that both The Stain and Biden (and don’t forget Pence…) had classified documents in their residences, where they should not have…! Got that..? They ALL were in possession of documents…right?

The difference is what happened next…! The crime is NOT for simply having the documents in those locations. If that were the case, then The Stain would have also been charged for those additional 90+ documents that he actually returned when requested. So, if your argument is that simply having the documents in your possession is the crime, why are you not pushing for The Stain to be charged for those other docs….hmmmmm??

No, your silence on that point undoes your ‘argument’. It’s inconsistent. The Stain was charged, after having been given several opportunities to return the docs without penalty, for wilfully retaining them AND for obstructing their retrieval…

And THAT is the difference…!

 

If the moron had only given them all back early on he wouldn't be in this mess.

 

And he just fabricates things over and over....

 

I can't believe someone is actually making this argument.

 

Exactly…!

 

Sorry, thats not the testimony of Maj. Gen. William Walker. I don't give a s*** what your media convinced you of.

Gen. Walker testified he was ready to deploy after the 1:48 call from Capt Sund of the Capitol PD.
He wasn't given the go ahead to deploy until 5:30pm and was told to stand down several times by his commanders, Gen. Flynn and Lt. Gen. Piatt.

Matthews’ testimony begins by focusing on a 2:30 p.m. conference call on Jan. 6 that included senior military and law enforcement officials, himself and Walker among them. Then-Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund “pleaded” on the call for the immediate deployment of the National Guard to the Capitol, Matthews recalled, saying that rioters had breached the building’s perimeter. Walker has also told Congress that Sund made that plea then. According to Matthews, Flynn and Piatt both opposed the move.

At the time, Piatt was the director of Army staff, one of the top generals in the Pentagon, and Flynn was the Army’s director of operations. The two men were the highest-ranking Army officials who spoke on the 2:30 call, according to Matthews.

“LTG Piatt stated that it would not be his best military advice to recommend to the Secretary of the Army that the D.C. National Guard be allowed to deploy to the Capitol at that time,”

In addition to Matthews’ memo, POLITICO also obtained a document produced by a D.C. Guard official and dated Jan. 7 that lays out a timeline of Jan. 6. The D.C. Guard timeline, a separate document whose author took notes during the call, also said that Piatt and Flynn at 2:37 p.m. “recommended for DC Guard to standby,” rather than immediately deploying to the Capitol during the riot.

 

Which has what to do with steeling the documents from the SCIF in the first place?