Michael Brown Autopsy: Suggests Teen Was Shot At Close Range: Report

He committed a strong arm, felony robbery, minutes before the encounter with the police, stop lying. The assault on the police officer was a felony, stop lying.

If I walk up to you while you are talking to a policeman and pull a gun and shoot you in the head and the officer then shoots and kills me before I can be tried does that mean I didn't murder you?

 

He died before he could get convicted, doesn't take away from the facts that he committed multiple felonies or that his demise likely ended the same, just sooner rather than later.

 

he was never convicted of a felony period, shoplifting is not considered a felony... regardless, one is only a felon if convected of a felony

had nothing to do with the shots the officer fired at him while at a disatnce

.

 

Shop lifting? It was strong arm robbery--pure and simple.
The leftist and their idiocy know no bounds!

 

he allegedly shoplifted a box of cigars, not sure if he had any cigars on him or not

but that is neither here nor there, as to if he should of been killed when at a safe distance from harming the officer, was wounded and most likely turning himself in so he could get medical aid


.


.

 

Strong-armed robbery is a felony and we have him on tape doing it.

Yes it did.

 

Strong armed robbery. Shoplifting is merely stealing something trying to hide it. He openly stole the cigars and assaulted the store owner who tried to stop him. That is a felony.

 

The only "alleged" part of this story is that Brown was a "Gentle Giant" looking forward to going to collage. The video tape in evidence clearly shows the strong arm robbery. Deal with it.

Exactly, the thug is dead.

Exactly when was that... before the first or second attempted assault on the officer?

Stick to the evidence-- not a made up story.

 

did he have cigars on him?

he never assaulted the officer, he only tried to get away and was killed because of it

.

 

You seem to have a problem sticking to actual evidence, I wonder why that is?

 

I base my opinion on the facts we know, if you are privy to facts we don't we can't apply them unless you tell us about them

 

... and ignore the evidence and the "facts" you don't like-- I already got that.

I can see how you "apply" facts and boy are they some whoppers! Do the facts support the officers account, yes or no?

 

Non-sequiter, he would know no such thing. He could very well be armed and not having pulled it during the robbery.

You get more and more desperate stop digging your hole.

 

Get away from what and how did the officer receive the injuries to his head as is being reported the forensic investigation found?

 

Why are YOU the only one who doesn't understand that MB pretty well mauled DW in the car, during the struggle for the gun? How can you not comprehend that blood from MB was in the car, and on the uniform of DW, from the first gunshot wound to his hand?
These 2 FACTS are all that is required to justify the killing of MB. Those 2 FELONIES that MB committed against DW. Stop LYING in your posts!

 

I am not the only one that disagree with you... stop LYING in your posts

blood in the car and on the uniform supports both my opinion as well as yours

.

 

The sky is BLUE. The moon is NOT made of green cheese. Argue all you want.

 

Of course not, you side with all the race baiting racist.

The only thing that counts is that it supports officer Wilson's account of events. No one cares about your alternate opinion.

 

Well, what makes the most sense is that brown got into a fight with the cop, the cop went for his gun while in the car, shot brown in the arm as brown tried to keep from getting shot, and then brown took off. The cop then got out of his car and as brown was fleeing, shot him again. Brown turned around, threw his arms up and the cop unloaded on him, killing him. That is what makes sense given the fact that a white landscape worker said right after the killing that brown had his hands up and the cop continued to unload on him. That makes sense. What doesn't make sense is after being hit by bullets, brown turned and charged the cop, thinking he would not be killed by the bullets.

What also makes sense if after brown hit the cop in the eye, the cop was pissed off and decided to kill this black bastard for hitting him. That is what makes sense.

If the teen had been on some hard drug like meth instead of pot, one could then reasonable think the teen charged the cop after being hit, while the cop still had his gun up and ready to shoot more bullets.


I think we have lots of cops that will execute you if you hit them, and perhaps that is the cop culture in some places. And they know how to cover their asses. It's the cop culture.


What needs to be done is to treat this cop like he was in the witness protection program, relocate him, give him a new name. For if not, someone is gonna kill him, shoot him down like a rabid dog. For when the law is lawless, there is no law. When cops act like criminals there is a blurring of the old lines. With many of these shooting and killing cases committed by cops, I cannot tell the difference between the good guys and the bad guys. For there really isn't a difference in many cases.