Of course it would lead to much darker places. I don't dispute that. The whole thing is a house of cards anyway, and the way I see it, the sooner it falls, the sooner it can be rebuilt. What do we do? Ask nicely? Ask how much extra jet fuel the big boys need for their leisure? Being nice ain't going to make anything happen. It's been tried.
1) I agree with that - that things are leading to that place. Things like more-and-more militarized police, legislation, executive orders, other Presidential orders, etc have paved the way for it to happen and be legal. 2) I honestly don't believe there is any way for private citizens to come out of it with advantage after the government drops the hammer. Think of the Soviet Union or North Korea. Complete subjugation which was/is met with minute resistance. Why? Because it is a death sentence or life in a labor camp not just for the "rebellious" person but for their family & friends too. 3) Let's assume though that the elite were deposed. What next? Someone has to lead. The cycle would begin anew. Why? Those who control $ & run the show. 4) People should be paying attention when flithy rich men like Bill Gates & Ted Turner openly talk about population control, specifically lowering it by several billion. I don't know how old you are, but I'm not even 30 yet - this great depopulation process will happen in my lifetime. As I've told my dad, I'm already figuratively dead. Most of us are, anyway.
My sincere advice to you, man, is to enjoy your life for as long as you can get away with it. Because when the other shoe drops, what's rebuilt in the aftermath isn't going to be a better version of democracy in America - instead, think of the Soviet Union & North Korea as better suited examples of what it'd be like here.
Well, then we can begin to rebuild a more equitable economic system for our children and their futures. So be it. It's going to crash regardless of whether anybody wishes it or not though. It cannot be sustained inevitably. - - - Updated - - - Well, then we can begin to rebuild a more equitable economic system for our children and their futures. So be it. It's going to crash regardless of whether anybody wishes it or not though. It cannot be sustained inevitably.
I think everybody looks at the evidence unfortunately its a bit like the blind men who encounter an Elephant and each has a different story to tell about the beast. sad really ......... maybe its exactly what the real perpetrators wanted, that is a mass of divergent factions that are at each other, rather than tracking down & busting the actual perpetrator(s). Divide & Conquer or?
Sad really how all this works, I respect the Military officers who have served their country. Just want to point out that this comes 'round to an argument from authority, in that these are to be considered extra credible people, because they have achieved these things in their lives, such as earning advanced degrees, or earning rank as an officer. Truly I intend no disrespect for people who have worked hard to earn their position in whatever field they have, but also may I point out the fact that anybody who did not sleep through science 101, can get this, tall buildings simply do not "fall down" in the manner that WTC1,2 & 7 did unless there is some special intervention at work, airliners do not punch holes in buildings and then disappear inside ( Pentagon magic trick? ). We have been treated to a made for TV drama, nothing more, its FAKE! and I know this disturbing news to some, and in fact so disturbing, that they will refuse to accept what is right in front of them, sorry about that.
Maybe in your opinion, however, there are all sorts of very good reasons to KNOW, that is not guess, not speculate but know that it wasn't a big Boeing airliner that hit the PENTAGON.
Not just my opinion. It's a fact. AA77 crashed into the Pentagon killing, among others, a personal friend.
I'm sorry for your loss, however, unless you personally were at the PENTAGON that day and personally witnessed "FLT77" crashing into the building, it is most likely that your friend was murdered by the same perpetrators who set-up the whole False Flag.
I've done the research and spoken to civilian witnesses who witnessed the crash. AA77 crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11/01. All evidence points to that conclusion.
Then you probably just need to look past the 'official' narrative and you'll be fine. - - - Updated - - - Only if they go along with the story, do they deserve respect (I guess?).
absolute certainty is a wonderful thing, "ALL" the evidence points to the conclusion that a big Boeing crashed into the Pentagon that day(?) really, ALL of it.
Yes. All of it. My family friend got on AA77. Her DNA and personal effects were found in the rubble of the Pentagon damage.
and so that accounts for "ALL" of the evidence? there is very serious evidence of the scene, that is the angle that the airliner was alleged to have struck the starboard side wing would have struck the wall aprox the same time as the nose was also striking the wall, talk about asymmetrical forces, and still the aircraft was alleged to have broken up in such a manner as to have 99% of the aircraft enter the building through the hole. plausible, probable or just plain outrageous? what?
This does not require "math" to prove the point you asserted that ALL of the evidence points to there having been a big Boeing crashed into the PENTAGON, however, the evidence of the actual crash, that is what could be expected to happen upon an airliner crashing into the PENTAGON at the angle that the alleged "FLT77" was said to have hit, and think about the distinct possibility of not only having the starboard side wing break off, but having the wing not follow the fuselage into the building but remain outside. What sort of probability would you estimate for this? we are down to probabilities again and really given precedent airliner crashes, I'd say the probability is very great for the wing to remain on the Pentagon lawn. This is not simply an "argument from incredulity" it is based on probability and data from previous documented airliner crashes. in addition, there is the matter of the physics of the event. in the case of an airliner crashing into the Pentagon in the manner alleged, the starboard side wing would most likely break off, and as a broken off bit, it would have less mass than the total of the whole aircraft obviously and as such would have then lower KE to cause the wing to travel. couple that with the concept that as a wing, it would by the very nature of its design tend to create lift, so upon being disconnected from the airliner, the wing would rise and the part that was closest to the fuselage would then strike the building higher up and lacking sufficient KE to penetrate the wall, would bounce off landing on the PENTAGON lawn. The data from other documented airliner crashes gives the foundation for questioning the official story of "FLT77". so in short, ALL of the evidence does NOT support the official story.
