Military officers want a new investigation

Discussion in '9/11' started by Stndown, Jun 24, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your entire argument is based on opinion, fallacies and incredulity.
    You display no physics, forensics or mathematics to prove your claims.

    Tell me: in your opinion, how did my friend's DNA and personal effects end up inside the Pentagon wreckage?
     
  2. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You really don't get it because you have an emotional investment
    in the loss of your friend and so you miss the important information
    in this case.
     
  3. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Except you're not providing any important information.

    Just answer the question. It's a good one: how did his friend's DNA and personal effects end up inside the Pentagon wreckage?
     
  4. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    again a horse before the cart argument.

    And I could very well ask of the loyalist in this forum
    how do you explain the lack of aircraft bits on the
    Pentagon lawn? the stuff recovered from the pentagon
    lawn constitutes less than 1% of the mass of the big Boeing,
    WHY?
     
  5. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    G-bob, I'm not asking you to provide any evidence to back up this claim. Please stop dodging and answer the question:

    Tell me: in your opinion, how did my friend's DNA and personal effects end up inside the Pentagon wreckage?
     
  6. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This question is exactly like
    upon noticing that cash is missing from the vault
    the bank manager demands to know ALL details of the case.
    no cart before the horse thank you very much.
    not happening, there is no answer to your question
    until some much more basic bits get taken care of.
     
  7. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm not demanding details. I'm asking your opinion. Do you need to contact someone to tell you what your opinion is?
     
  8. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OK, OPINION ..... Insufficient data!
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Insufficient data.

    Fact: she boarded AA77
    Fact: her remains were found in the crash site in the Pentagon.

    What other data do you need to form an opinion?
    Need to make a call? Waiting for someone to tell you how to answer?
     
  10. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    even if you went to the airport to see her off, and watched
    her board the aircraft, there are so many thing that could have
    happened, that its futile to speculate, the fact is that she is gone
    and now there lingers the question as to who the perpetrators
    really are, because the angry Arabs explanation doesn't work.
     
  11. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you just admitted that the parts found were from a Boeing.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Angry Arabs kill lots of people so why doesn't that work?
     
  12. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    First of all my statement was
    " the stuff recovered from the pentagon
    lawn constitutes less than 1% of the mass of the big Boeing, "
    I did NOT specify that the parts alleged to be from an airliner
    where in any way proven to be from an airliner.

    also, the angry Arabs flying hijacked airliners in the manner
    described in the official story and also crashing in the manner
    described in the official story and also causing the sort of damage
    described in the official story - simply isn't happening
    a huge string of low probability & implausible ( how about impossible)
    and all of these events strung together make the attack of 9/11/2001.
    right, you know of course that this amounts to rolling snake eyes
    1,000,000 times in a row.

    Hijacked airliners were NOT used on 9/11/2001

    the whole hijacking bit was an excuse to create
    Home Land Security & the TSA
    why isn't it called AIRPORT SECURITY
    why Transportation Security?
    because then they get to take over ALL transport in the U.S.A.
    and you don't believe that total control is the goal,
    the perpetrators hate our Freedom!
    ok, exactly who are the perpetrators?
     
  13. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your sig line is clearly anti statist,
    however, your agenda appears to be in alignment with
    the wholesale consolidation of central control in the U.S.A.
    and for that matter the planet, all of the industrialized nations
    have similar problems with creeping authoritarianizm.
     
  14. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    thats cause the ones that defend the official version everyday on message boards are paid shills,hense why they always ignore facts and have to lie all the time.the people in real life that wont accept,are in denial syndrome.
     
  15. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    correction there,the airliners alone could not have brought the towers down,one of the main desginers who participated in the construction of the towers said they were designed so that they would remain standing if MULTIPLE airliners struck them and they remained standing there after those airliners allegedly hit them for over an hour. they did not topple to all the explosives went off later on from the basements that many witnessed.

    - - - Updated - - -

    the truth hurts you obviously.hee hee
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    'truth' :roll:
     
  17. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OK, please enlighten me, just exactly what is it that
    you are trying to express using the little cartoon character
    in your post?
     
  18. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,872
    Likes Received:
    3,568
    Trophy Points:
    113
    By many you mean a handful
     
  19. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My $0.02 worth for this thread,
    its a fact that if any sentient beings at all
    question the official explanation of events for
    9/11/2001, then it should be investigated,
    however it does lend weight to the argument,
    Military officers, or for that matter firefighters
    or any group with significant standing in this world
    can question the official story and thereby focus attention
    on something that needs be properly investigated, not the
    silly white-wash job that was done the first time.
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Then they should launch their own investigation, as dozens of other independent researchers have done worldwide.
    Ask them to take a break from fundraising and do some examining.
     
  21. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is a difference between a group of civilians getting together and investigating an event, and say the Congress & the Courts doing the job, what needs to happen here is for a body with authority to call witnesses and compel testimony to do the job, and do it right. Maybe this job needs to be done by an entity outside the USA, possibly the UN, or?
     
  22. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    defeat obviously.:grin:
     
  23. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Like i said before,somehow those kind of people experts in their fields,what they say means absolutley nothing to them.their warped logic they have is if the corporate controlled media and the government say it happened this way and who was behind it,its automatically true.:roll: they should start a comedy club.:roflol:
     
  24. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,872
    Likes Received:
    3,568
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No exp-erts are questioning it.

    You confuse laymen and no bodies with experts
     
  25. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would consider that there are experts in various fields,
    such as but not limited to controlled demolition,
    Danny Jowenko is a credible source (rip) and also, I
    consider David Ray Griffin to be an expert witness on
    the subject of logic & reason. Have you ever paid a visit
    to the Patriots Question 9/11 web-page?
    Experts abound, people with advanced degrees have signed
    up as experts for AE911Truth.
    the fact that you say there are no "exp-erts" speaks volumes!

    Just to let you know, Ya, I'm one of those "no-bodies"
    who have no special claim to fame as an expert, however
    I can see that the official story of 9/11/2001 = FRAUD.
    this is not rocket science, people can get this, if they didn't
    sleep through science 101.
     

Share This Page