More americans are “rethinking” 9/11?

Discussion in '9/11' started by Brother Jonathan, Dec 1, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [video=youtube;A7tSfwkKaUo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7tSfwkKaUo[/video]

    The 9/11 truth movement is growing worldwide. This is a good video by Ben Swann where he talks to 27 year Mechanical Engineer career Tony Szamboti who calls NIST WTC Building 7 explanation impossible. New information reveals that NIST lied in their report that column 79 was "unrestrained" when in fact it was restrained.
     
  2. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Interesting how these idiots keep saying that it's 'impossible' and they have 'new information' about column 79......where did they get this 'info'...a seance?

    And it damn sure WAS possible.
     
  3. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    He's right. NIST's official explanation is impossible. Where did they get the new information? Freedom of Information Act. Ben Swann tells us that in the video. Did you not watch it?
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    column 79 is long gone,anything they got through FIA and drew conclusions from is speculation

    there were NO explosives in 7
    it WAS structurally damaged
    It WAS on fire
    it did NOT 'fall in it's own footprint'
    it does NOT look like a controlled demolition,since part of it fell quite a distance,before the rest started falling...no company would allow that to happen,they'd rig it so the entire structure would fall almost at once

    They're big on telling us why it's 'impossible' but short on telling us 'why'
     
  5. Karma Mechanic

    Karma Mechanic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ben Swann just traffics in half-truths. This is a great example. If you take an honest look at Building 7 you will see the report you say was impossible is the best explanation.
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113

    there were NO explosives in 7
    witnesses said there were after being blown across the room
    it WAS structurally damaged
    no it wasnt structurally damaged, prove up the claim

    It WAS on fire
    So fire takes out yet another building in a symetrical global collapse. 3 miracles in one day!
    it did NOT 'fall in it's own footprint'
    footprints are like horseshoes, yes it did.
    it does NOT look like a controlled demolition,since part of it fell quite a distance,before the rest started falling...no company would allow that to happen,they'd rig it so the entire structure would fall almost at once
    no it didnt where did you dredge that misinformation up from?

    [​IMG]


    what a silly foolish thing to say

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Exactly. It is classic controlled demolition.
     
  8. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Look at the gif again,the structure starts failing halfway down the face of the building no controlled demolition allows this

    there were NO 'witnesses' in building 7 to be 'blown across the room'

    FDNY reported a large gouge was taken out of the south face as well as the southwest corner....the face troofers never saw and never talk about
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    People make such fools out of themselves when they put others on ignore and are clueless when they are owned! LMAO

    again:

    [​IMG]

    too funny
     
  10. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ben Swann does not traffic in half-truths. Ben Swann is an honest journalist who seeks and tells the truth.

    NIST, on the other hand, outright lied about column 79 in the official report. NIST's credibility is out the window.
     
  11. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where was the lie?...were you there to personally inspect column 79 before the collapse?
    and swann just tells you what you want to hear..

    Another odd thing....you're claiming 7 was a 'controlled demolition',yet insurance investigators,who would have loved to deny silversteins claim,found no evidence,even after initially suspecting fraud...
     
  12. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    classic controlled demolitions don't damage neighboring buildings or have no sounds of explosions prior to collapse.
     
  13. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I always laugh when truthers say their movement is growing world wide.

    How many signatures did Gage's "rethink" campaign get again? Yeah, "growing" lol

    5,000 people showed up in Dallas for JFK's assassination ceremony. Hundreds spontaneously showed up at ground zero and the white house to celebrate when OBL was killed. A couple of dozen show up the the '9/11 truth' rally for the anniversary of the attacks.

    "growing"
     
  14. EggKiller

    EggKiller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2012
    Messages:
    6,650
    Likes Received:
    483
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Is not L,Ambiance plaza a good case study of floors pan caking?
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
  16. EggKiller

    EggKiller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2012
    Messages:
    6,650
    Likes Received:
    483
    Trophy Points:
    83
  17. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Conspiracy theorists are a cancer spreading across America.. Over years they make up all these fantastic stories about the president, CIA, FBI, press, airlines perpetrating the biggest US terrorist attack in history and some start to believe it. They flood the internet having nothing better to do and instill all this garbage into people's minds. They have done the same with JFK and now 50 years after the assassination, many American's believe in a conspiracy. How do conspiracy theorists accomplish this? They certainly don't have most of the facts and hard evidence on their side but they are persistant in their pursuit to brainwash people. They write books, make movies and spread stories all over the internet forums and other channels. Unfortunately, over a period of time after bombarding Americans with stories on a daily basis, they have convinced some, those who haven't actually studied the facts and evidence themselves. One undeniable fact remains - they don't have any hard evidence of a conspiracy and they never will.
     
  18. Gatewood

    Gatewood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    47,624
    Likes Received:
    48,666
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean who are you going to believe; the gentleman who repeatedly stated, "If you like your plan you can keep it, period, and if you like your doctor you can keep him, period," or perhaps you those enlightened individuals in the mainstream media who intimated that a first term senator with ZERO meaningful national level experience was somehow going to be a political messiah if put inside the Oval Office? Hmmm . . . well now . . . let me give this some additional thought.
     
  19. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't trust Obama more than i trust my neighbor or a co-worker at the bank.. Some of you, however, think that as soon as someone steps into a government role, they morph into a non-human entitiy or go through a mind control brainwashing program. The people in government are as trustworthy as the people in a corporation, small business; people walking in a park; people running a charity and even priests and churches. How many times have priests and pastors been proven to be frauds? corruption uncovered in private corporations? what about all the corrpution with charities? it's rampant in case you didn't know. You all don't hold anyone outside government to the same standards as the people in government which is hypocritical.

    Do politicians lie sometimes and can they all be trusted? yes and no, but this goes for people in all walks of life, period. Now to come up with stories about the president bringing down twin towers and killing 3,000 Americans is an entirely different animal, this is less credible than a pig flying and i really feel that there is something wrong with people who believe in this.
     
  20. Gatewood

    Gatewood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    47,624
    Likes Received:
    48,666
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sigh! Somebody is forgetting that politicians are public servants who work for the citizens. It really does not matter how wealthy the fellow is or how many body guards he warrants or how lengthy his motorcade every time he goes across the city to cheat on his wife with his mistress. We are his boss and he is accountable to us. He also represents an entity -- the government -- that was so notorious for tromping on the rights of citizens and for being corrupt that the founding patriots saw fit to instill a series of checks and balance within our Constitution so that we have a remote chance of keeping the arrogant and ruthless sons-of-bltches under some form of controlled supervision. Corporate bosses on the other hand work for themselves. Shockingly, it's not comparable.
     
  21. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's not the conspiracy theorists that are the cancer in America. They are the ones exposing the conspiracies. It is the conspiracies themselves that have been causing so much havoc in America. It started with the conspiracy between German born international banker Paul Warburg and Senator Nelson Aldrich, et.al., at Jekyll Island in November 1910. Federal Reserve of Minneapolis admits the conspiracy: Paul Warburg's Crusade to Establish a Central Bank in the United States
     
  22. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    derailing your own thread?
     
  23. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No not at all. Just exposing conspiracy. All the conspiracies are related.
     
  24. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I guaruntee you that turning this thread into a JFK, Titanic, or Fed discussion will be considered a derail by the Mods.
     
  25. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    it is comparable, they all human beings with the same tendancies, temptations, flaws, motivations and desires.
     

Share This Page