buried the story? the story of the collapse of WTC 7 was buried? prove it. I was in Hong Kong on 9-11 and even I knew about the collapse from watching CNN.
You should really spend some time learning about the 9/11 truth movement instead of just blindly trying to debunk the truth. The first words Ben Swann spoke in the OP video, "Did you know a 3rd tower fell on 9/11?" Obviously, a lot of people still don't know and that is why the campaign to get the truth to the people.
why would I try to debunk truth? I only work to debunk lies and distortions. I try to help the uninformed understand what happened on that terrible day, and help them not get suckered into the lies of the "Truth" Movement.
Ben Swann is a truth teller so much so that he went out on his own to report on the news independently and objectively as good investigative journalists do. BenSwann.com for those interested in Truth In Media.
Well, I have to admit it: the 'truth movement' grew by three new members. Reality TV stars Tila Tequila, Heidi Montag and Spencer Pratt have publicly announced their truthership. http://anonymoustruthblog.com/consequences-shifting-911-paradigm-lies/ The brain trust goes on to drop this little nugget: Congrats, 'truthers'. These are your people.
You are once again contradicting your experts? Gage says says WTC7 completely collapsed in 6 to 7. Are you now disputing Gage's, who is your building 'expert', claim? So now it's partial freefall that constitutes what a controlled demolition is?
Its the trougher mentality, they think that you have a standing obligation to change their diapers and if you dont you are an unpatriotic no good for (*)(*)(*)(*) awol traitor.
hey he is not the one that a whole thread was dedicated to in vain attempt by a kind hearted soul to explain something as simple as freefall
AWOL? that would be impossible. only patriotic & courageous people who serve in our armed forces can go AWOL.
Can a 'truther' or whatever you conspiracy people are called, please provide a scientifically peer reviewed and accredited piece of support and evidence for your claims?
Yes, a lot of stupid people did not know that there was a third building down. They were not paying attention. The really whacked-out element, though, are those people who think that it is really significant. Why do you people have such a problem with a simple concept like "collateral damage?"
they dont have a problem with the concept they have a problem with people who have a dont give a (*)(*)(*)(*) could give a damn attitude, you know military types with no conscience or moral compass. yes only stupid people get their information from the evening news. but times are a changin. its not significanr you read about rogue operators taking out our 47 story buildings all the time.
You have still failed to show us how such a large building could be rigged in one day to fall like that. That is to say, you have utterly failed top show that it was not, like the other structures around it, a victim of collateral damage.
I dont have to show you that, who says it had to be rigged in one day? oh and no it was not. if you think it was prove it. no pictures never happened.
