>>>MOD EDIT: INSULT<<< Craig Bartmer, former NYPD, First Responder and ground zero worker witnessed and testified to the explosions and the reporters along with the lady with the baby all heard the explosions that cut the core columns just before the building started to collapse. Watch it again, [video=youtube;ERhoNYj9_fg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ERhoNYj9_fg#![/video] Clear cut controlled demolition.
All expert engineering and architectual agencies and organizations have confirmed that the WTC collapsed due to fire, weakened steel, impact damage, explosion damage, and gravity.
Bartmer is a cop, not a fire fighter or explosives tech. Banfield and the lady with the baby appeared to be responding more to visual than audio clues. Get some forensic training.
The only fact you have to worry about, is the SIMPLE fact that you can not, even if you were Einstein, possibly extrapolate the thoughts of 300 million by interviewing a mere 1,300, which is equivalent to .00004%. Are you REALLY a mathematical genius?
Doesn't take a mathematical genius to figure out the the "official" BS story is complete BS but, I DO have very good math skills, and some common sense so, I don't need to be Einstein. - - - Updated - - - ....and you don't need to be him either, to smell a rat in the BS story.
Right. You need to be an explosives tech to know what an explosion sounds like. Just like you need to be Hitler to know what a Nazi is. Lol.
You do, actually. A gas tank cooking off sounds a hell of a lot different from a hand grenade, for instance. I will state categorically that nobody recorded a blast consistent with a demolition charge that day. I say this as someone who has actually place a few destructive devices in places for military purposes.
I can't. I have been warned by the moderators that if I post that video that proves the explosions just before collapse of Building 7 again I'll get banned for spamming.
how about you instead make your own argument, with your own words. if you fully understand the subject matter, you can express it with your own ideas and language. and wont need to post a Youtube video to express what you already know and can elaborate on.
Because I am not interested in making stuff up. That YouTube video clearly proves Building 7 was a classic controlled demolition with explosions just before the building came crashing down.
no, it does not. if you're soo convinced of the facts of 9-11, express them. tell us what you know, in your own words. show us that you have researched this subject and have the facts and knowledge to back up your claims. we are not explosives experts no demolitions experts. we don't know what a TRUE CD looks like. our eyes and ears deceive us due to personal biases.
No it doesn't...And if you knew the subject matter as well as well as you say others should,there would be NO reason for you to 'make' anything up.
Barely hearing a 'thud thud thud' from a couple of blocks away is not what a controlled demolition sounds like. This is what a controlled demolition sounds like; [video=youtube;79sJ1bMR6VQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79sJ1bMR6VQ[/video]
He's supplying the 'proof' the specialists are always demanding. Now, that's not good either? All over the place, go the specialists.