Multicultural society a failure, 40 percent Moroccan Youth have criminal record.

Moroccans are the 2nd largest non western group in the Netherlands, much of the rise of Wilders comes due to them attacking homosexuals, etnic dutch, and attempting to take over entire neighborhoods.

Time to deport, on a large scale. Time to end this failed multicultural state.

http://www.nisnews.nl/public/101111_1.htm

 

Good luck. Do you think that immigration policy might change in your country?

 

Multi-CULTuralism is a failed 20th century social experiment that the world refuses to accept as fact.

 

Multiculturalism isn't a failure. Not being selective in immigration policy is.

 

Indeed. Multiculturalism is humanity. All humans have a multicultural background and ancestry, while immigration is an economic strategy.

 

i missed the artical claiming those atacks and wouldnt the homosexuals be in more wealthy protected neighborhoods..

 

No really, sadly we have a bastion of left socialist hippies who just flat out refuse anything you say, regardless of proof, the fact that their only new voters are also the same immigrants also does not help to change.

Anyway people are fed up, for good reason and either the politicians will fix this mess in the next 10 years or people will fix the issue themselves.

 

Well, according to Angela Merkel, David Cameron and Nicholas Sarkozy Multi-CULTuralism has failed.

And any sane person would tend to agree...

 

Sarkozy is the child of immigrants from Hungry. Merkel is an immigrant from the DDR and Cameron's mom came from France, Spain, Germany and Byzantium while David's dad is from China and the Czech republic. They are all the result of multiculturalism.

 

They are the result of migrants moving from one nation to another for a better live, to learn and be part of society, the opposite of Islamic and African immigration who tend to be vastly more criminal, dependent on welfare, and are virtually more present in every single negative stat you can think off.

 

You mean that Semites tend to be much more hated in Europe for crimes that they never did.

 

If you mean Jews, they are not really hated since WW2.

 

Jewish Semites are hated too, but the hatred of Arabs is much more convenient for anti-Semites these days.

 

In my neighborhood multiculturalism doesn't work. It has simply created separate peoples filling separate economic niches.

 

in general, criminality is not linked to ethnicity, but to other factors.

if people of one particular ethnic group are overrepresented in crime statistics - what else do they have in common, that is not widely shared with the wider population?

and what do they have in common with criminals from other ethnic groups?

 

Please don't introduce facts & relevant questions to an immigrant-bashing thread.

 

They share a non western background, a culture where it is not common to learn the nations language first ( rather they learn it far later)

Concentration of the same etnic group in one area.

How come Indonesians succeeded ?

 

The Wilders clan is already infamous for exaggerating about hated Semites living in Holland:

Netherlands: PM warns Wilders of overemphasising Moroccan crime
http://islamineurope.blogspot.com/2011/09/netherlands-pm-warns-wilders-of.html

 

No its not time to "deport" the whole Morrocan population. Just about anywhere in the world the minority group practice some sort of deviance. The minority groups seem to always hold some kind of social distance.

For example, the three theories of integration are assimilation, amalgamation and accomidation. None of these ever worked.

You for one practice a couple of the levels of prejudice. Both the emotional, and action orientation level (possibly). Since all I have seen you do is pick on one particular racial/cultural/religious group of people in a negative way. Your solution to a problem like this is to just "deport" all of them.

Minority groups usually react to continuous discrimination in different ways. Sometimes its avoidance, where they are making their own ethnic neighborhoods. But in this particular case, we can say that its deviance, since they are violating the social norms.

We have seen this in many societies. One that I would to point out is when the Native Americans seized Wounded Knee on February 27 1973 for a violent/non-violent protest. This would be an act of defiance, which could be a legal protest or illegal violence. Even Asian-American groups had trouble with integration and caused crime. We can even point out the Aboriginal people in Austrailia as an example.

This isn't some kind of mystery that a minority group would cause trouble. I suppose every country in the world should deport their minority groups then? And when I say minority, I'm not only speaking how the group is in numbers, but mostly I'm talking about the power that particular group holds in the society they live in.

 

All people the world over fall within the same range of intellect and innate capability. But not all cultures are equal. Some cultures have characteristics and values that help them succeed, and others have characteristics and values which impede success.

 

Multiculturalism today is a religion, that's a fact. Any facts and argument based on reason you may introduce into the discussion will only meet with a rhethoric that you're a racist and such. What's more, multiculturalism and immigration reforms both stem from the confusion of the 1960s rather than some high ideal. In Britain, it was the cabinet of a Labour Prime Minister who introduced it. One of his ministers was found guilty of spying for the Soviets, but he managed to fake his own suicide and escaped to Australia where he lived happily thereafter under an assumed identity. The said Prime Minister was also under investigation by the British secret service for alleged prior Soviet-spying activities. One can only guess what sinister motivations guided these people to turn everything upside-down?

In the States, the 1965 Immigration Act was the work of three men, who essentially opened the floodgates. One of them, Edward Kennedy, wanted more Irish immigrants in, but not to appear racist, he had to raise and alter all quotas. Here is a list of reasoning and promises these men used to pass their bill, and how their re-assurances all proved to the contrary. Also keep in mind the previous immigration policy in place was not racist at all. It only said that the quotas for immigration intake would need to reflect the recipient country's existing ethnic make-up. Today we've reached a point where immigration memorandum is needed, and desperately so. But politicians are cowards and of course will do nothing. They will not move out of their comfort zone. They have their business to attend, Solyndra-style, get prayers into schools, travel the globe with their entourages, like that Canadian politician who skipped all the presentation meetings and cut-and-pasted her reports off the internet etc etc.

http://www.vdare.com/articles/so-much-for-promises-quotes-re-1965-immigration-act

 

I contend it has not.... AMERICA.

 

because they are Muslims?

 

My favorite bigotry centered idea I've seen often on this board. When asked to expound he will surely mention the Asian's and European's as successful cultures... of course they would be even more successful if you eliminate the Polish and the Hmong from whatever metric you wanna track success with. Last part of last sentence is sarcasm meant to magnify ignorance in the position.

 

No one is suggesting to deport legal immigrants, or anyone who does not look like the basal-stock Uganda-style, just stop a further influx which currently has spiralled out of control, osmosis-style. Why do the States need a billion people or more, so everywhere it will look like southern California?