NEW-100% Proof Of Controlled demolition of WTC 7

Discussion in '9/11' started by Don Townsend, Sep 2, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    THIS IS ABSOLUTEY THE SMOKING GUN 100% PROOF OF CONTOLLED DEMOLITION OF WTC 7-ONLY 48 SEC

    [video=youtube_share;4GY0yWXGaKs]http://youtu.be/4GY0yWXGaKs[/video]
     
  2. cpicturetaker

    cpicturetaker New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2012
    Messages:
    6,147
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    IT'S BS. 13 years, no proof. (The video is the least compelling 'evidence' I've seen yet).
     
  3. Gorn Captain

    Gorn Captain Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Messages:
    35,580
    Likes Received:
    237
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wrong forum. There is a Conspiracy Theory/911 forum for such posts.
     
  4. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So given 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration ( and well documented at that )
    and YOU do not see the slightest bit of suspicious activity here at all?
    WTC1,2 & 7 were controlled demolitions. Can anyone prove, by way of either a totally open source computer model, or the building of a physical model that demonstrates the "collapse" mechanism of any of these three skyscrapers? The NIST did a computer model, and then labeled the source data SECRET as a public safety measure, to release the data would endanger public safety?!?!?!? WHAT? The Bureaucrats are screwing AMERICA!
     
  5. Karma Mechanic

    Karma Mechanic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    48
    so why do people like the OP post bogus footage if it is so clear?
     
  6. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I didn't know it was "bogus", The fact is that the NIST ( etc .... )
    have embraced the concept that WTC7 fell for 2.25 sec at free fall,
    this is significant in that the fall of WTC7 as documented in many "newsreels" shows a building dropping straight down at free fall, the ONLY way to achieve that is to have ALL of the resistance removed all at the same time. Just how does anyone expect that to be the result of chaotic fires?
     
  7. Karma Mechanic

    Karma Mechanic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The internal portions of the building collapsed first.
    The OP's video is bogus and proved so on this thread.

    Again I ask if the evidence is clear why do truthers lie so often>?
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Show your math. Still waiting for you to support one of your claims.
     
  9. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So do you disagree with that 2.25 sec of free fall?
    and if so, what supporting evidence do you have.
    If indeed the 2.25 sec of free fall is real, ( and it is .... )
    then the case is, that ALL of the support under the North & West walls of WTC7 would have had to disappear all at the same time, to produce that result.
     
  10. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    video is a complete fake.

    disgusting that you would post such a fraud.
     
  11. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Support this claim with physics and evidence. Or are you just speculating?
     
  12. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Clearly, the physics of this being
    that if any physical object is seen falling at free fall acceleration,
    that means there is no resistance under it. So how was it done that is by chaotic fires, to have ALL of the supporting structure for the North & West walls of WTC7 simply go away and all at the same time?
     
  13. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,031
    Likes Received:
    3,635
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is not physics it is just an uneducated opionion answer the question with physics and evidence and stop evading it.
     
  14. jafc

    jafc Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Don and Bob you do know that video in the op is fake. A quick google of Edward Current wtc 7 gets you this and you why you're never taken seriously.

    [video=youtube;k8VAsoVuShM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8VAsoVuShM&list=UU20U2rjFhakOCOlvJn0MAGg[/video]
     
  15. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Question:
    are ALL of the videos showing WTC7 dropping at free fall acceleration "fake"?

    or?
     
  16. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Okay , he makes a fake video how does that negate the facts the building fell at free fall speed WHICH IS IMPOSSIBLE ACCORDING TO EVERY ARCHITECT AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ON THE PLANET. Show video or written documentation of a bona fide structural engineering saying that this building was brought down by simple office fires which by the way were almost completely out at the time of the collapse
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You really need to stop saying this donny,unless you can PROVE it..
     
  18. jafc

    jafc Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Really every Architect and Structural Engineer on the planet agrees have you spoken to them all, you must be a busy boy.

    It just goes to show you'll jump onto anything that you think proves your theory without checking the source or any of the details in the "evidence".
    My favourite bit of it is the UFO flying over, but hey I love a bit of UFO action.
     
  19. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Does anyone have a response to my post ( # 15 ) ?
    Just curious...... The critical point here is the fact that WTC7 fell at the rate that it did, and keeping its shape on the way down. People can speculate that it was exclusively the North & West walls of the building, but none of the speculation can be supported because there was no forensic examination of the rubble pile, and no photos from the other side of the building, therefore, no solid evidence of anything. The bits that are seen falling even if only the North & West walls as a hollow shell, are still many tons of material and to get many tons of material to fall in exactly that way, what do you think it takes?
     
  20. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,031
    Likes Received:
    3,635
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It did not fall at free fall speed

    >>>MOD EDIT Flamebait and Quoted Post Removed<<<
     
  21. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NIST report sez "FREE FALL ACCELERATION" + measurements from independent researchers confirm free fall.
    what makes you think that it wasn't free fall acceleration?
     
  22. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    It was an average, not actual free fall.

    >>>MOD EDIT Off Topic Removed<<<
     
  23. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,031
    Likes Received:
    3,635
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The NIST report says no such thing and that has been proven over and over.

    The so called confirmation is merely conspiracy nuts twisting numbers to get a desired result
     
  24. Vlad Ivx

    Vlad Ivx Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,087
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    WTF are you trying to prove with that video? The flying saucer is embarrassing enough. You should choose a better video as reference to discuss the collapse speed. There's plenty.
     
  25. snakestretcher

    snakestretcher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    43,996
    Likes Received:
    1,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok, so, if there was no forensic examination of the debris, how come you and your 'colleagues' are in possession, apparently, of evidence that thermite was used in your fantasy of a controlled demolition? Who carried out the forensic examination to reach that conclusion?
     

Share This Page