NO ONE DIED in the WTC on 9/11: Post the evidence

Discussion in '9/11' started by l4zarus, Jan 15, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. The Amazing Sam's Ego

    The Amazing Sam's Ego Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    10,262
    Likes Received:
    283
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Mods, please lock this thread!!!
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    For what reason? A claim was made, a request has been submitted for evidence ... the claimant(s) have yet to provide any ... why lock it?

    - - - Updated - - -

    For what reason? A claim was made, a request has been submitted for evidence ... the claimant(s) have yet to provide any ... why lock it?
     
  3. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0




    That really looks good! Nobody would ever suspect, given that post that.....ohhhhh...nevermind.
     
  4. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,825
    Likes Received:
    3,808
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did you write this post, or did someone write it for you?
     
  5. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ridicule. How quaint. That's different.

    Something to put on the time sheet...
     
  6. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,825
    Likes Received:
    3,808
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's not ridicule. I honestly have no clue how to tell the difference between the ones you claim to have written and which you claim have been hijacked. How are we supposed to tell?
     
  7. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Because I know what I wrote and keep copies intact. That's PRECISELY how.

    "WE"? Who would "we" be? We both know what the deal is so please, save your act for somebody else. Oh....and "great job".
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If a 'truther' provides sources or evidence for their claims, it's a hijack.

    If they flee from their statements and pretend to have never written it, or ignore evidence presented to them - it's a real 'truther' post.
     
  9. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ....and if a shill presents something, we know they're on the clock and working hard.
     
  10. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Which is why he asked, YOU! Get it? He says, "How do we know this is." Cause claim to be hacked. You reply with, "' cause I know." So if you speak condesendingly for asking then how else are we, non mind readers, suppose to know?
     
  11. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,825
    Likes Received:
    3,808
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you are the only one who knows what you wrote, then the standard test needs to be for us to ask you if you wrote it or not, correct?

    How will we know if the confirmation comes from you, or the person who has hijacked your posts?

    "Us" and "we" are pronouns. The are used to represent the people who are reading your posts, and the posts you claim were written by someone else.

    Did you write this post?
     
  12. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I take it you fell that the responses to my posts by shills are NOT condescending almost always? Why would I respond any differently? Why would I want to? Get it?
     
  13. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    You're so intelligent! Never knew what a pronoun was. Thanks for your non condescending enlightenment. Which particular post are you asking about now? This past post or the one the boss hacked originally?
     
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Enlightening you is never condescension,fraud,It's an outright necessity..

    - - - Updated - - -

    Enlightening you is never condescension,fraud,It's an outright necessity..
     
  15. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,828
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Plenty of people actually died on that day. Sad!
     

Share This Page