Officer Wilson recounts struggle with Brown

Yes, lol. He is a police officer. It is his job to deal with this, and they above all should know the importance and significance of getting the story immediately. Not that it would directly villify Mr. Wilson, here, but the police have a long record of covering up inhouse scandals. It's why Internal Affairs was created in the first place.

Unfortunately, the blue wall of silence seems to be in operation here, as well. Who knows...if the case depends on the investigation of the guilty parties, I don't see it as much different than letting any other murder suspect investigate his own crime.

 

Drawn guns did not stop that fellow with the knife shortly after, almost seems to be the same insanity,,or arrogance.

 

No I do not agree, it is my opinion if a officer is in no physical or mental condition to complete a full report immediately they cant force him. That man has rights too.
This is only common sense to me, what are they supposed to do? Smack him and say,,,''Snap out of it!!'' Rights work both ways...

 

Have you? If not what is the purpose of asking someone such a stupid question.

 

What evidence do you have of this?

 

President Obama and AG Holder are personally involved with the full weight of the Federal government behind them. Wut? You don't have any faith in them either?

 

Ahh, well that explains a lot of where you are coming from. Thanks for the insights.

 

It doesn't reflect well that merely mentioning Israel simply shuts you off to any further discussion...unless you thought your remark cute.

Even so...have a good day.

 

Is there a reason I should trust Obama and Holder? Holder is about to resign to dodge the allegations of his involvement with Fast and Furious, not to mention various other scandals dogging him.

 

Stupidity isn't as bad as willful ignorance, just remember that.

 

I thought the exact same thing, wasn't it the cohorts statements that changed?

They're honestly trying to side with the guy who changed his story 3 times.

 

Well, I was never very popular with the Stormfront/antisemite/Sovereign Citizen/Christian Identity and conspiracy theory crowds.
I think most of them consider me to be an (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*). The feeling is mutual.

 

Then why would you come to these forums? Most of the people here debate against the official narrative provided- whether it's Obamacare, Benghazi, Education, Democracts in general, Republicans in general, etc... You probably have as well. Even more so, criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitism any more than your criticisms of me is anti-American; not that I mentioned a conspiracy anyway, since American Police and the Department of Homeland Security both receive consultations from Israeli forces.

Maybe you didn't see that though, since that helmet was covering your eyes

With respect though, sorry you can't talk more, and I won't follow this particular argument any longer on this thread.

 

I will send you $100 bux if you can find me saying any such thing. Niiiiiiice assumption though.
Thats your trophy for putting words in my fingers.

 

Studying people has been an interest of mine since the mid-70s. Politics and religion often bring out the best and worst, usually worst, in people which is why mothers across the nation often forbid it being discussed at the dinner table.

Since these topics bring out the base feelings of people, it offers the opportunity to see into their hearts and minds without the veneer of civilized behavior. You've probably heard the phrase "A drunk man's words are a sober man's thoughts". The mask of anonymity that these forums provide have the same effect. People say things here that they'd never say in public, perhaps not even to their own families. It's a gold mine of human psychology.

 

The same artifice that people use face-to-face, they will use on the internet. Slightly less in some instances...slightly more in others. You cannot learn truths about a persons mind, per se, but you can learn a lot from studying the habits of people doing anything.

 

That is correct. What's interesting about an anonymous Internet forum is, like the aforementioned drunk man, people are less self-filtered. They say what is on their mind more freely and without fear of consequence.

Even if you are your own boss, you filter yourself to the public, to your employees, even to your family.....or do you really tell every attractive woman with larger than normal breasts, "Hey! Nice tits!"?

 

It was a question not an accusation. Anyone defending the race hustling piece of (*)(*)(*)(*) Sharpton speaks volumes to me

"Putting words in my fingers"? Now that's a new one

 

The phrasing made it look like an accusation: "Are you seriously wanting to see a police officer be lynched if the evidence clears him of any wrong doing?"

(*)(*)(*)(*) Al Sharpton and his race-baiting fans. He should use some of his millions to help those who he claims to be helping.

 

Maybe they are watching too much television in which the lead characters (good and bad guys alike) don't even blink as bullets are flying past them and they so easily defeat their foes. You got a lot to answer for Hollywood!

 

It's why so many of us figure drugs have to be in play, fighting or challenging a Cop is just plain stupid. At least by suggesting drug use we are giving them some excuse for their absurd decision making.
You fight a Cop you lose, that simple....

 

Already been asked and answered which means someone else didn't find it to be stupid or they wouldn't have answered. Now run and tell that.

- - - Updated - - -

What evidence do you have that it didn't?

 

You have no idea how trials work do you? Was there any bruising around Browns throat? Any signs that he was grabbed by the throat and pulled anywhere?

 

Suuuuure you were.

Like my phrase?

 

Well please enlighten us professor. I don't know whether he was grabbed around the butt or the throat and neither do you.