Part 28 of Post Your Tough Questions Regarding Christianity

Exactly! For starters it would help tremendously if he was more specific in his responses and yes it's always a good idea to include the subject matter of what you are talking about.

 

Are you trying to tell me with a straight face that the Ten Commandments aren't a group of principles?

 

I thought this thread was about answering hard questions, not about being smug and circle jerking with Incorporeal. In addition, you're replying to posts from so long ago, that there is no way you actually know the context of conversations with other people. You and Incorporeal belong together, two intellectually dishonest peas in a pod.

 

You have deliberately made up a fictitious story to make your point appear to be
credible. You are absolutely wrong. They don't serve the same purpose.

Let me try to make it simple for you.

The Passover and the Lord's Supper are two completely different events.

The Passover is Old Testament and Christians don't participate in it except
for personal edification. It isn't necessary in Christianity.

No part of the Passover service was/is used during the Lord's Supper.
You've missed or ignored that point.

Unlike the Passover, the Lord's Supper isn't a commandment.

Nothing in the Lord's Supper came from the Passover. If you can find in the Passover
service "This bread is my body, take and eat" or "This cup is my blood,. drink of it"
(that is the Lord's Supper and nothing more is added) then you've got a point. It
doesn't take place. Your point is incorrect.

Using the term Paschal Lamb doesn't make the Lord's Supper the same as
the Passover. They are two completely different events.

The term Paschal Lamb wasn't used in the Lord's Supper service.

NO! The Lord's Supper is not a commandment. Nowhere in scripture is it commanded to
partake of the Lord's Supper.

Jesus doesn't command it in Luke 22
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+22&version=ESV

 

I care about all men. I may not agree with them. I may think they are incapable. I may think they are ignorant. But when you have a brilliant mind like mine you can be generous .

 

They are the same.

No, there's still 60. They are still evidence of the coming of Jesus in the Old
Testament. If you choose to ignore that's your privilege. By the way, it doesn't
help you with your point.

Which is Jesus, in context.

You took the Kings out of context. Isaiah7:17 says, "The Lord will bring upon you and
upon your people and upon your father's house such days as have not come
since the day that Ephraim departed from Judah—the king of Assyria.”

Context is very important.

Ignorance is bliss as they say.

 

It's not bad news. But thanks.

 

Forget it, I'm getting bored with it.

 

Post limit thread closure notification. Please continue your discussion here
http://www.politicalforum.com/relig...r-tough-questions-regarding-christianity.html

Shangrila
Moderator