Paul fans Get their wish !

you're projecting, it's ron paul and his nut case followers that exhibit disturbing behavior

here's an example:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5rJI5e0jBU"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5rJI5e0jBU[/ame]

 

It's not my freedom I'm worried about. It's the freedom of the financial industry to cause worldwide misery without prosecution-letting them make their own rules, destabilize the economy of the world and walk away with people like you cheering them on nauseates me. I made it through the recession better than most, recovered my 401K in about 14 months after Obama was elected. But I am an exception, and my house is still undervalued. We have experimented with this "freedom" from time to time in America and always had to pay for it, I have never in my life seen people do things so counter their own benefit than now. Paul is wrong, Reagan was wrong and free trade cannot exist in a world economy.

 

Good, then Paul should have your support.

That is quite impressive, and something to be proud of.

Undervalued and no longer overvalued are two different things.

We haven't, it hasn't, you have, he isn't, he was on certain things, and it necessarily does.

 

LOL. What does this prove?

It proves that the only way for Mr Hannity to hear the voice of America, is for people to chase him to his car...

I mean he always talks so unkindly about Dr. Paul on air. The camera doesn't talk back...
He consistently ignores the voice of the people by removing his online polls, when Dr. Paul is winning, Or discrediting Dr Paul, Live on air after a Debate, that his poll clearly shows that Dr. Paul has won...

So tell me Dujac, How is that video not justified?
Dont give me your usual diversionary one-liners...

 

the actions depicted in the video are vile and uncalled for

i have little respect for sean hannity, but i wouldn't stoop to what those people did

 

Cool, thanks for sharing your opinion.

I dont think thats the general consensus though...

 

what do you think the general consensus is on this issue?

that it's ok to chase someone down the street, harassing them over their political views

 

No, what i posted earlier, i'll post it again if you're confused...

 

that's a little like saying the only way for jfk to hear the voice of america was for him to get shot in his car

pardon the hyperbole, but the voice you're talking about is way out of line and beneath the dignity of an honorable person

 

How can you relate the two?

Completely irrelevant. I should have known you would do this. You always do this...

 

Paul would deregulate the industry and allow the financials to become even more predatory. My house was indeed overvalued but due to unemployment in the area many houses are vacant now driving down the value even more. Prior to the Constitution, we had a libertarian nation, it didn't work. During the industrial revolution we had a libertarian economy, Teddy slapped them down. free Trade only works when all the nations you trade with practice it, last I heard, China still has unfair tariffs and controls the price of it's own currency. Deregulation from the Reagan days are directly responsible for the current economic debacle.

 

Are you kidding me? What we have now is corporate welfare where these predators can play any game they want with the financial market and if they lose the tax payer bails them out! With Ron Paul in the White House these people would vanish when they go bankrupt, not fall softly into a golden parachute provided by their minions in government and paid for by the tax payer. Ron Paul voted against the bail outs. These entities would be non existent and replaced by better business models.

Compare the way we handled the economic downturn in 1920 that lead to the roaring twenties. Cut taxes, cut spending, cut regulations, and the U.S. recovered in just over a year. Compare this to FDR's approach which was a total disaster that lasted over a decade and took the total destruction of all industrial rivals for us to `recover.`

Crony-Capitalism and corporate-welfare is not the answer.

 

sure they would, congress would just bow down and let ron paul do whatever he wants

what a joke

 

the president signed the bailout bills, or did you forget?

 

the subject is ron paul

 

Cop out....

 

it's no cop out, it's the truth

 

Sure it's the truth...and it's a cop out (on your part).

And almost anyone who reads your post knows it...even you...somewhere inside you.

 

in the future, when responding to my comments, either write something on topic and pertinent to my argument or don't respond at all

 

The point is that the president signed the bailouts. Ron Paul wouldn't. It's a bit sad that I needed to explain that to you.

 

what does that have to do with ron paul lying about his newsletters?

 

nobody cares about the newsletters.
stop wasting your breath.

 

Nobody cares about the newsletters because nobody heard of them until now.
If nobody cares ..why the protest and negativity ?
Let the cards play out and Paul will win like he always does ?

I have over 3,700 views.. 300 replies..
And most of it is negativity toward anybody not seeing an issue that might make Paul look or appear to be something he is not ?
The Obama press ( and you know they hate Paul ..right ? ) will dig up this stuff and display it night after night..how a Old ..white ..southerner has ANYTHING with his name associated with it near anything like this.

Obama can be the hype..young..modern ..strong on killing terrorist leaders...and he didn't close Gitmo ...because it was the right thing to do..
He can show he is after drug dealers and drugs.. against demonizing illegals..
and for tax cuts.

Paul will be the opposite on every issue..and lose.

He will be seen as out of touch..no base in congress..no political or military endorsements..
A Tebow moment for Paul..not likely.

I know I would never support Paul as President nor would most Republicans.
I dont need the newsletters..
I know what Paul represents...a untested theory on governing.
the libertarian way.

And another experiment is out of the question..no matter how much the Paulites spin it.

 

Never said crony capitalism was the answer, but neither is RP's solution. The most pragmatic method to control this rampant pay-for-play congress is to prevent large money in campaigns and exclude lobbyists from the process of government. And yes, I mean unions too. Then we regulate where it needs to be regulate with a panel that annually audits regulations to see if they work or need replacing or just ended.

 

Rule by the corporate/government collusion is an ideology and would not be solved by banning campaign funding or lobbyists. You must elect people who stand against this idea of rule by the elite and especially those who believe in more international technocratic rule.

That's what progressives are all about, ruling the world through global corporations and bureaucracies, not to serve the interests of their constituents. Just look at big crony Obama, the progressive. Just look at all of these progressives and neo-cons in the CFR and working towards their agenda for international rule. CFR also includes leaders from 200 global corporations.