People furious as star athlete insults Islamic prophet Muhammad

Historical event as recoded in the Bible. Why does it offend you?

You are free to think its fiction, but seems no one is allowed to disagree with it.

The race card is not an argument. Jews and Arabs are not even different races.

 

A recorded historic fact is something that actually happened in history. And this part in the bible is pure fiction.

This has nothing to do with "think it's fiction". That makes it sound as if I got some religious believe in it that can be disputed. The Egyptians wrote down everything, and there is nowhere to be found any passage of them mentioning some presence of Jews, and them leaving, same with the 7 plagues etc etc. And so it did not happen. Same with the fall of Jericho. The Egyptians do mention Palestine.

They are ethnically different, and so you can most certainly be racist against one of the two, or both if you will.
And you're still not disputing that Jews brought this on themselves by ethnic cleansing civilians by law to thieve their property without any kind of reimbursement even, while the Jews go on with bringing this on themselves because nobody is making them to go beyond their border to ethnic cleanse other peoples properties as well. Any patriotic American would use the stand your ground law to use as much violence needed to drive ethnic cleansing war criminals off their land. No American judge would ever side with the likes of you claiming a person who uses a stand your ground law in such cases are to blame. But there is you, who pin the blame on those who are ethnically cleansed and violently oppressed on the victim. How else can this be explained without a race card?

 

As I understand it, both examples were verified. You've asserted what you claim is fact numerous times, but you provide nothing.

 

O sure the society that thought their rulers were literally gods would TOTALLY not omit getting their **** pushed in by a slave populace.

The **** are you ranting about here? Lobbing rockets and committing terrorist attacks against a sovereign nation are not 'stand your ground' applicable.

 

Ten Saudi Arabian judges 'face the death penalty for being too soft on women's rights activists' | Daily Mail Online

• The judges have all been charged with high treason after signing confessions
• One of the judges allowed a prominent women's rights campaigner to walk free two months after she appeared before him in December 2020

In the most moderate of Muslim states: Saudi Arabia, where Islam isn't a political movement or anything. To suggest otherwise would be patently ridiculous.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Fact_Finding_Mission_on_the_Gaza_Conflict
Israel refused to cooperate with the investigation, claiming anti-Israel bias in the UNHRC.

Stop talking nonsense.

 

It never happened.

You're a typical pro ethnic Jewish Israel casually omitting to take into the equation that the Jews ethnic cleansed Arab civilians by the 100,000's and band them to return home for the sake to thieve their property inside that sovereign state, and than moved beyond the border to go forth with it. That's where stand your ground applies. While stand your ground doesn't apply when your the war criminal who ethnic cleanses civilians.

 

Did you ever link the Jews bombing innocent

Did you ever link up your claim of Jews bombing innocent hospitals recently or is that just fabrication # 1,937,749?