The sad thing is RT claims to work in IT, yet can't read a simple call log from a carrier. Working with mass data storage we read logs all day long in regards to what we're storing, moving and adding. It's like Koko filing forms against himself with the court.
A call log indicating ONE incoming call, specified as such. The rest aren't designated at all. Conclusions can be drawn from that very easily.
Yeah, I know. What it actually says means nothing. What you guys say it says means everything. People are stupid too so, they'll probably buy your BS.
Wrong again, 'Fraud. What it actually says means your premise is wrong. Once again, you've provided evidence that debunks your own claim.
Am I? Please highlight for me, where it says what you claim. I see ONE incoming. How many do you see?
The posted document is a Verizon log, not a phone bill. The listed incoming call was incoming from Beamer's phone to Verizon. Note the number and time stamp. All the other calls are outgoing to Beamer's phone. This has been repeatedly pointed out several times now.
I'd respond to you but, that would be pointless so, I won't. INCOMING...one call. That's what the document reads, not what you are characterizing. Oops...I responded..my bad. You got me again. Bye boss.
Beamer was calling Barbara Olson so that they could get together for a celebratory drink before leaving the country. Isn't that obvious?
Well, I will just say that it would be impossible to make a phone call from a demolished plane where there were no survivors.