Please cite your best evidence of "no-planes"

With this simple statement I can conclude that you've never participated in any court proceedings, anywhere. Your scenario does not exist in the real world.

- - - Updated - - -

Uh-huh. Do let us know if you ever decide to take your case to a real courtroom. I really want to be in attendance.

 

oh but there is a certain thrill watching the opposing attorney pass the check across the table.



free country conclude whatever you wish.

 

[video=youtube;Vb8KgxChs3w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb8KgxChs3w[/video]

Damn radar and witnesses, no planers do not have a clue.

You really do same some silly things sometimes.

 

what kind of crap is that!

he never said he saw the plane HIT the building, he left it to the fertile imaginations of some people to fill in the blanks and they did. seeing an explosion is not seeing a plane.

 

He saw a plane diving for the towers, and then he says "Another one just hit the building".

Clearly he must have had his eyes closed. You've never been in an air traffic control tower have you?

 

keep hand-waving away the evidence.

 

another WHAT just hit the building?

a plane?

He didnt say he saw a plane hit the building.

he was watching something on radar then looked out the window to see the building in flames then said hey another one hit the building.

Unlike dablunder sites I DO NOT fancifully fill in the blanks.

 

Nice strawman. I am simply disgusted by those who make claims without evidence or facts. Those would be Truthers. They do nothing more than contribute to the dumbing-down of our country. Take the "no-planes", or the Sandy Hook Hoax myth...Just crap perpetuated by people who think they are smarter than they really are.

- - - Updated - - -

Common sense,logic and evidence would eat you up and spit you out in a court of law. No judge would by your delusional Twoofer Two-step.

 

Debunkers and Hasbarats really love discussing the "no planes" theory. Given as many eye witnesses there were to the planes hitting the buildings they'd much rather get into that as they would to examine all the evidence implicating the Zionist cabal.


[video=youtube;zCD7YMlNQGA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCD7YMlNQGA#t=28[/video]





There's another false plant (photo shop) at about 6:40 or so.
This is the way they do it. Mix bits of unbelievable information in with the damning truth. The unsuspecting viewer then is supposed to discard the truth with the lie.

"Mission accomplished".


The take home message here is the witnesses who stated emphatically that the planes they saw hitting the WTC buildings and the Pentagon were NOT ordinary commercial planes.



The disinformation agents will continue to perpetuate the lie with the intention of allowing the subject to slowly recede into history and the publics interest to wain just as it happened with the Warren Commission.

As long as the Machiavellian disciples can "get away" with a thing, it matters not how.

Many crimes have gone unsolved and many gangsters like Meyer Lansky have died natural deaths without ever once having to face man-made justice.

Many people observe this and conclude that there really is no such thing.

Ezekiel

 

[video=youtube;9SoZunUMal4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SoZunUMal4[/video]

 

wow so much drama in your post! Too bad however that I dont sucker for drama or pity.

See its the dablunder sites that are dumbing people down with their 1/2 assed pseudo science. Everything the dablunders do is geared to get people to dismiss everything out of hand and not look into it, and your parroting these sites here is very telling.

See you should direct your disgust when you look into the mirror, because as you can see I demolished the airport controllers valiidty since it has no basis in fact, yet these dablunder sites continue to push that crap as fact.

So who do you think supports dumbing down? Dablunderers who blindly support the government or truthers who point out all the fraud and lies?

 

Koko is desperately trying to keep his delusion alive in the face of eye witnesses and radar. He makes things up, like saying tower controllers decide to watch radar screens instead of looking out the window and the airliner passing right in front of them lol.

[video=youtube;VJig1wj7oLI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJig1wj7oLI[/video]

- - - Updated - - -

[video=youtube;lyqo4oh-AzU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyqo4oh-AzU[/video]

 

yeh that same girls voice overlay is used on like 12 different videos and get this all from different locations.

you did not see an aircraft impact the building in either of those clips.

Stop pretending you did.

radar? could have been tracking a lear loaded with gear LOL

 

prove it with evidence.

 

Prove any of your hand waving with evidence. Videos show airliner impacts, and had witnesses clearly stating it was an aircraft. All the audio I've linked also does. You just keep fooling yourself. I'm done. No planers are still crazy, and this thread hasn't changed a thing.

 

If dablunder sites would pay attention to what evidence is then none of their blind followers would say "prove it with evidence".

 

Yes Truthers are always short on the evidence thing. Yet demand such high standards from others so bold as to challenge their claims

 

The Hasbarats keep shuckin' and jivin' trying to convince everybody that "Truthers" are people who don't think that planes hit the twin towers.

How's that workin' out for you ladies?

[video=youtube;9SoZunUMal4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SoZunUMal4[/video]

 

Like 12 - so you dont know. It could have been 13 or 11 or 1

But was it? That up to you to show. Just because something could be something else does not automatically mean it must be

 

no they dont and I am really surprised after all this time none of you grasp what I am talking about. Oh really? Witnesses? Kool bring em on, and dont forget the paperwaork k. That audio is voice overlays used on several videos making any videos using those voices the laughing stock LOL

May as well be done then, see how these dablunder sites fail you time and time again when put on the hot seat and you are forced to present legitimate facts. Running away wont cure that.

 

There's some good information in here. You guys will love it.

[video=youtube;5clAy8hh5kU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5clAy8hh5kU[/video]

A whole LOT of people KNOW who was behind 9/11.

Think about that 'youskies'.

 

yeh a lot, its not like I scour the internet everyday to keep count on how many voice overs that same voice was used in. No its not up to me to show, your google works just as well as mine.

 

you "might" be able to get me to buy into the missile concept. It would explain some of the interesting issues with several of the first broadcasts that were later buried by the hezerkhani clip that was aired every 10 minutes for 7 years.

 

Yes it is - you make a claim that flight controllers could not have seen the impact of an aircraft at the WTC, but show no evidence to support your claim. Yet in the same thread you demand evidence from a poster that they made a police statement regarding what they saw while in New York on 9-11

Even for a thruther you are offering a substandard performance

 

http://airline-whistleblower.blogspot.com/p/drone-technology-employed-on-911.html

Not necessarily Director Mueller. In times past traitors like Jonathon Pollard would have faced a firing squad.
Today our Congressional "Representatives" entertain the entreaties of those who would have him released and hailed as a 'national' hero, "national" with reference to our "allies" Israel.
You know, the dudes who brag about owning the US.