Predictions on how Biden will respond to drone bombing

wtf are you talking about. Trump was the most anti-globalist president in the past 100 years

 

During an appearance on the conservative Newsmax channel this week, Mr. Flynn pushed for Mr. Trump to impose martial law and deploy the military to “rerun” the election. At one point in the meeting on Friday, Mr. Trump asked about that idea.

Ms. Powell’s ideas were shot down by every other Trump adviser present, all of whom repeatedly pointed out that she had yet to back up her claims with proof. At one point, one person briefed on the meeting said, she produced several affidavits, but upon inspection they were all signed by a man she has previously used as an expert witness, whose credentials have been called into question.

The White House counsel, Pat A. Cipollone, and the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, repeatedly and aggressively pushed back on the ideas being proposed, which went beyond the special counsel idea, those briefed on the meeting said.

Mr. Cipollone told Mr. Trump there was no constitutional authority for what was being discussed, one of the people briefed on the meeting said. Other advisers from the White House and the Trump campaign delivered the same message throughout the meeting, which stretched on for a long period of time.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/19/us/politics/trump-sidney-powell-voter-fraud.html

What I realize is Don's advisers shot down the ideas. The lens through which you look gives him credit for not declaring martial law, or confiscating voting machines, to advance the plot to steal the election. The lens through which I look sees Trump giving an audience to a couple of lunatics, who shouldn't have been within 100 hundred miles of the WH let alone let in to the Oval Office. I don't give Don a pass for surrounding himself with people who are unfit as you do. Powell was spouting delusional conspiracy theories about Venezuela yet Trump wanted to name her Special Counsel. Are you effing kidding!!!!!

 

So, funny you should say that given that there's a story just today that terrorists relocated because Biden folks told them they were going to come after them... I fear you missed the point entirely. Tell us again, what congressional mandate does mr Biden have to start these little wars he's so eagerly pursuing?

 

There will always be wars. We stopped Germany's, Italy's, and Japan's aggression with a powerful response. I guess you would go the "Chamberlain Route" and think the Iranians want "peace in our time".

 

Donald could have told those advisors to **** off and imposed martial law couldn't he? But he didn't did he?

 

Yes, Biden is presiding over "peace in our time" while his weakness encourages more aggression from the world's bully nations, China, Iran, Russia and the little piggy who wants to play, North Korea.

 

I think you have made my point. How would you react if Biden had sent missiles to a country that was in the midst of a civil war? How would you react if Russia stated that in fact there was no chemical warfare in the country who was having civil war that we just bombed? And how would you then react when a year later Biden's general stated that our previous bombing had not "gotten the message through"? And how would you react when that bombing was done as a multilateral effort including the Brits, and 'gasp', the French? And how would you react if the following year Biden withdrew our troops from that country during a civil war?

Pretty sure you would be calling him a globalist, a Neo-con, and criticise him for cutting and running.
That is why I KNOW that regardless of what Biden does in the Middle East, you guys are so coloured by your partisanship that you will be against it. Even if it is EXACTLY what you want.

The OP is asking you to state what it is you think should be done to see if you actually agree with Biden. So this is your chance, what do you think should be done? WE are all ears.

 

And what you're supposed to be any less partisan? Like you give Trump credit for the peace accords he got signed right?

 

Hitting Iran's proxies real hard and reinstate the sanctions Trump on Iran instead of ignoring them like Biden is doing which made Iran rich.

 

His Open Borders for 3 years gave Iran ample opportunity to load our cities with dangerous terrorist cells. His plying them with massive loads of cash has given them even more war material than Bribed Joe gave the Taliban. His weakness inflamed them to the point where their proxies slaughtered the Jews, are killing Americans, hindering a major shipping choke point.

This is the problem with being an idiot, after awhile every choice leads to disaster.

Iran Announces That Bribed Joe Is Their Bitch: Threatens to Strike Back, If Bribed Joe Retaliates For Killing Americans



'At a separate event, Hossein Salami, the head of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, was rattling some sabers as well. He said that Iran “does not fear war.” The IRGC is obviously directly involved in most of the terror attacks taking place and taking him out would send a strong message.'

I'd like to give Bribed Joe some truth serum and find out what his plan really is with the Iran Appeasement and Open Borders, because it makes no sense to me. Is Iran bribing or blackmailing him? Are the Mexican Cartels? So not knowing what in the hell he is doing or trying to accomplish, I have no way of advising him, though I certainly can point out that what he is doing looks like a complete fustercluck being run by a beheaded chicken.

 

Deflecting much? Can you explain what legislation mr Biden is using to support his adventurism and war mongering?

 

Your post indicates that you expect the choice Bribed Joe makes, to result in failure, and so you are trying to figure out how to blame someone else for the next Bribed Joe foreign policy failure, in a presidency that has been one foreign policy failure after another.

Your thinking reflects Bribed Joe's cowardice. He isn't even aiming for success, he's trying to fix blame for his failure before he even acts. He was too stupid to be president even before the mental decline. One of his first foreign policy positions, a half century ago when he started was to bug out of Vietnam and leave our allies to the enemy. He mirrored that in the Kabul Bugout.

But, given that he's brainless twit with terrible judgement,
And given that the Constitution grants CONGRESS the power to declare war,
And given that Bribed Joe can't figure out what the hell to do now that he has put himself in this mess,

I think he should toss it to Congress and ask them for a declaration of war against Iran. If they grant it, then hit them, if they refuse it, then Iran's continued unchecked aggression is on Congress.

Congress loves to shirk it's responsibilities and then blame the President for the outcome. Force them to make a damned decision, with a recorded vote that forces them to stand behind it.

And close the damn border and direct the FBI to uncover and take out of action, all the Iranian Terror cells that they have surely embedded through our invaded nation.

Those are two smart moves Bribed Joe could make, which all but guarantees that he will do neither of them.

 

He considered it. That's bad enough.

 

True. He's basically single-handedly responsible for driving the modern GOP toward hatred of capitalism and free markets. What an idiot.

 

Which proxies specifically and what does "real hard" mean? Sanctions are still in place and more added. Iran exports to China and Asia. What do you want Biden to do with that?

 

And still you haven't said what you want him to do!

 

It's not my job to tell him what to do, he is the president, not me. Further, I suggested he request a declaration of war from Congress. Congress loves to pass the buck, but Constitutionally, they are the branch that commits us to war. See post #63 where I lay out my reasoning. Take care, Zorro

 

I predict 85+ military targets.... What's that? He did?

See? I was right!

Seriously, how many times do we have to tell you guys that being part of the MAGA right automatically makes you LOUSY at predicting... anything!

Now... with that in mind, do you want to predict the outcome of Trump's trials? No? How about the elections? Hmmm... Maybe you want to predict when Hillary is finally going to get locked up?

 

Yes, I'm wondering how many janitors he killed.

 

'The point of a response is not to even the score. It is to end the contest.'

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/proportionality-again/

We'll see if Bribed Joe accomplished that.

Biden trails Donald Trump by ten or more points when voters are asked whom they trust more to handle these crises.

 

Oh! Is that another prediction? We can actually tell what's happening by the predictions MAGAs make. It's easy: whatever they predict, the OPPOSITE is almost certainly true. So I'm happy for the janitors!

Care to make a prediction about the November elections? We now know that whatever you say, the opposite is true. And it would be nice to know in advance.

 

What do you think? Because we know that whatever MAGAs predict, the OPPOSITE will be true. And this thread proves it.

And, of course, your prediction is that this is any indication whatsoever of the election results in November. That's great news for us democrats! We'll have to tag your post to review it on November 6..

 

With the enemy having the luxury of several days to prepare for the anticipated American 'retaliation', it is likely that, for the most part, about all we did was blow up some targets from which everything of any importance had been evacuated or sheltered.

Does anybody have any credible damage reports to enemy assets... or is Joe just acting tough for the face-saving value of it? Face it... our military was caught inattentive and half- asleep (much like "Commander-in-Chief" Joe himself)....

 

So they didn't have time to prepare BEFORE they attacked an American military base to prepare for retaliation?

Dear God! You MAGAs are really desperate!