[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bavou_SEj1E"]I Got 15 Kids & 3 Babydaddys-SOMEONE'S GONNA PAY FOR ME & MY KIDS!!! - YouTube[/ame] Now this is a woman who obviously does not believe in abortion. Many pro-life organisations maintain they will support the children if the woman refuses an abortion - so where are they?
Hysterectomy is a major surgery which is NOT done for birth control. Tubal ligation would be the birth control measure.
I will take that as a no. I thought you said childbirth was life threatening? You obviously don't care at all about this woman's well being!
Just pay for her tubal ligation, it will be a lot cheaper, a lot healthier for the woman, and acceptable to medical professionals. Hysterectomies are done for medical reasons, health reasons, they are NOT DONE for birth control. Hysterectomy is a major surgery which affects a woman's whole body, hormone levels are affected forever, altering a woman's body so that she probably will have to take artificial hormones. Tubal ligations are minor in comparison.
Just pay for her tubal ligation, it will be a lot cheaper, a lot healthier for the woman, and acceptable to medical professionals. Hysterectomies are done for medical reasons, health reasons, they are NOT DONE for birth control. Hysterectomy is a major surgery which affects a woman's whole body, hormone levels are affected forever, altering a woman's body so that she probably will have to take artificial hormones. Tubal ligations are minor in comparison. And with the money you save by not paying for a hysterectomy, you can pay for another woman's tubal ligation. Please donate it to PP today.
Here's a multitude of articles, many from individual PP facilities describing tubal ligations offered by PP. http://www.google.com/search?q=tuba...rlz=1I7DLUS_en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7
I just can't take this kind of people. Do they ever know when to stop? We are human beings not dogs. She should have know when to stop. And if she really wanted to have sex so much there are always condoms and anti-conceptionals. But no, she prefered to have sex and the throw the blame and responsability on someone else. Disgusting.
I showed this to my boyfriend and he laughed and was like, "Wow, the same guy knocked her up 10 times? He has great aim!" xD
I don't completely disagree, however, some of this world's greatest minds came from very humble beginnings.
I do agree with you, however giving birth to 10 to 15 kids with the hope that one will be a genius is at least naive.
I don't know that this was her motivation, but the fact remains that one killed by abortion could be the one who cures cancer.
They provide them when asked. That is the only important fact. They could provide them for free if people like you would donate more.
This is the most pathetic argument ever. Using birth control may have prevented the conception of the one who could cure cancer.
I hate the "he/she could have cured cancer!" argument. First of all, cancer can already be cured if you catch it early on. Second of all cancer will always exist because it is when abnormal cells divide out of control and invade other tissue in the body. Third, do we not have any faith in the people working towards the 'cure' now or what? Oh yeah, let's forget all the thousands of other people who are already here working towards that 'cure' or at least better techniques to rid the body of cancer. Our hope must lie in someone who hasn't even been conceived yet for sure!
What a load of manure, why not just grow up and admit you don't have any idea if they do or don't perform these surgeries on women.
That is idiotic. Apples and oranges. I am talking about snuffing out someone who exists, you are talking about someone who never existed.
And condoms fail as do a lot of other contraceptive methods The thing is many pro-lifers claim that we would be better off without abortion because they will "support" women like this - I am asking if any of them are willing to come forward and assist