Pro-life - Where is your support for this woman?

Sure it is SS. That is the point to every Bowerbird thread. Find the most convoluted stories or ideas and try and twist it to support abortion in every way.

 

Nobody cares what the reason was.
Was she raped 15 times? No.
She conciously had sexual intercourses and gave birth to 15 kids. Now she expects other to take care of them.
The fact that the media is outraged is a more than normal reaction.

 

Abortion is plain and simple murder. No matter how you swich it.

 

Did she have access to free sterilisation processes? What price is birth control in America?? Condoms are usually cheap but that implies the Babydaddys actually also have to make an effort

In other words what avenues were really available to her

And if there really is that many people in that area of america having excess children I would suggest you follow the example of some of our towns and introduce a "condom tree"

 

Is it still murder if the woman's life and health are at stake?

 

And no matter how many times you ask them, lifers cannot show one instance in which a woman was arested and changed for committing that 'murder'.

 

Then why do so many people choose to adopt from overseas? Could it be that there are heavy restrictions on adoptions in the US?

 

The turn around time to adopt internationally is usually much faster.

It's a bureaucratic nightmare to adopt domestically. By and large, who populates the bureaucracies in the USA? Liberals.....

Consequently, kids languish is foster care, which is often (*)(*)(*)(*)ty. The process could be streamlined, but the liberal bureaucracies will have none of that.

Liberalism always produces the exact opposite of it's stated intent.

 

I know that you are trying to protect her but you are giving empty arguments.

If you know that you can't afford to have another kid and have no means to protect youself from that, you simply stop engaging in sexual intercourses until your social status improves. I don't think life is at stake, people can live pretty well without it. Plus it is a voluntary action, not an instinct like in animals.

 

Yes, and I will always save the baby at the stake of the mother.

 

That because laws in this area suck. However I find it funny how Wester society legalized abortion and now they complain about the demography and that they are invaded by arabs and africans.

 

No, but you can find plenty of instances of a perpetrator being charged with murder for murdering a fetus, or even an embryo in utero.

 

Why is that?

 

But not one charge filed against the woman for obtaining a legal abortion, which was my point.

 

I see, you want to ignore the 800 pound (362.87kg) gorilla in the room.

If you want to get technical, it's not usually the mother of the unborn child who commits the murder.

 

Then why haven't any abortion doctors being charged?

 

Why indeed......

 

Because she had her chance to live already. There is time to come, a time to live and a time to go and make place for someone else. You have no right to take someone else's life be it born or unborn in order to save your own.

 

Because this type of murder has been legalized by the same liberals that today complain about the agening population.

 

Do you understand that if the pregnant woman dies, the zef is likely to die also? Only if it is near term is there a possibility of saving the zef. Do you understand that if a woman dies, the children she already has are at risk? You are saying that NO ONE has a right to self defense under any circumstances, even though self defense is accepted as a justified reason for killing by the vast majority of people.

 

Self defence has nothing to do with what we are talking right now. And if there is a small chance to save the baby I will take the risk. Only if the baby is already dead of has no chances of survival I can accept abortion.

 

She doesnt need them. Unless she was raped, she has 100% control over whether or not she gets pregnant.

She can even still have sex and not get pregnant. Gay men do it all the time.

She does not require the babydaddy's permission. All she has to do is limit his access to places where she cant get pregnant.

Or, you know...she could just not have sex. I mean, it is possible to survive without getting your cooch pounded daily. Just sayin.

Enough to avoid pregnancy if avoiding pregnancy was one of her goals.

 

Ah...so you are saying slavery was ok as long as it was legal. Because the law defines morality. Got it.

Some of my black friends might disagree with you.

 

LOL, you are supporting my point. Demand for babies is high in the US. Much higher than the supply.

 

You are reducing women to the level of incubator. It's as if you believe that women's only goal in life is to reproduce. Valuing the possibility of a member of society over an already existing member of society is foolish, as well as degrading to women.