Proof that the Moon Mountains were Backdrops to a Movie Set/MOD WARNING

Discussion in 'Moon Landing' started by Scott, Apr 4, 2015.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You know exactly what the argument is.
    https://www.aulis.com/images/raq12.jpg

    The horizontal part represents the fake lunar landscape and the vertical part represents the backdrops used to fake the mountains. This picture...
    https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/a17pan1174743.jpg

    ... and the others linked to in post #118 are consistent with that scenario. The continuous line in the background looks like the edge of the fake lunar landscape.
     
  2. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,095
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You just reposted what amounts to an idiotic opinion and all of the above completely ignored.

    Once again for the hard of understanding - there are literally hours of video where we see the camera zooming in on this supposedly faked backdrop. Just the act of doing this with no real change to the background shows the distance involved. Suggesting that instead of using the faultless videos to take images, they created other ones, that MUST match the video, complete with the never ending list of minor changes necessary to maintain consistency, that is at a level of absurdity that only you can contemplate!
     
  3. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
  4. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,095
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I looked at the bottom of that page and noticed an idiotic picture.

    I checked and amazingly, it was there again. I wondered what kind of person needed to post a duplicate, then I remembered it was you doing it.

    Please explain in your own words why you think "it looks suspiciously" like anything. In case you have trouble understanding, you aren't presenting any evidence here, you are stating your very uninformed ignorant opinion based on your confirmation bias.

    Both of those links point to random images, do you find it hard to work out how to use a search engine as well?


    Clearly to an honest person, with no doubt whatsoever, these 3 images are from greatly differing vantage points - anyone who says they match exactly is blind, lying or delusional.

    [​IMG]

    Exactly what we are seeing!

    Kilimanjaro proving this Rourke clown wrong:
    mount kilimanjaro - Bing images
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2022
  5. James California

    James California Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    11,335
    Likes Received:
    11,469
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ~ Maybe the real Man-In-The-Moon will start one ...
    IMGP4921.JPG
    9c1903b98d93a6063a3f07215738fe93--the-honeymooners-first-tv.jpg
     
  6. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
  7. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here's something else to think about.
    https://www.bing.com/images/search?...ctedindex=1&ajaxhist=0&ajaxserp=0&vt=0&sim=11

    That mountain in Hawaii looks suspiciously like a mountain in a few Apollo pictures.
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/21652570416/in/album-72157658627346820/
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/21677945836/in/album-72157659083773941/

    I'm not saying I'm sure now.


    This video is about the rover but it deals with the scenario of the edge-of-the-lunar-landscape theory.

    "Apollo 16" Rover on Moon Hoax~Exposed~
     
  8. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,095
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I suppose if somebody really is this clueless about any subject in any relevant field they will seek out batshit as confirmation bias. The above is so very dumb it is almost inconceivable that anyone could even consider it. Then again serial forum spamming doesn't ever differentiate between batshit and reality.

    Clearly to an honest person, with no doubt whatsoever, these 3 images are from greatly differing vantage points - anyone who says they match exactly is blind, lying or delusional.

    No response as always.
     
  9. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,095
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I like what this person says about the serial forum spammer.
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2022
    MuchAdo likes this.
  10. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Check out this analysis...

    AMERICAN MOON (2017): A FASCINATING DOCUMENTARY ABOUT THE MOAN HOAX FROM START TO FINISH
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/CoP5WywgvPHs/
    (45:58 time mark)


    ...and this one.

    Moon Hoax; "Apollo; Hoax Of The 20th Century" Part 2 of 2

    (28:00time mark)
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2022
  11. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is not analysis it is fiction like all of your failed claims
     
  12. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,095
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No response as always.
     
  13. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
  14. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,095
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The forum spammer needs to answer the post. An objective truth seeker would admit if they were wrong. Just above an internet clown with no photogrammetry skills makes bare assertions with his troofer-style astonishment voice and the serial forum spammer, sees the spam batshit and posts it.

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch...53b-4517-45f4-87dd-480212be5558_820x620.jpegz[​IMG]

    It's exactly as it should be!
     
  15. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2022
  16. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,095
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hey troll, answer the post..


    Clearly to an honest person, with no doubt whatsoever, these 3 images are from greatly differing vantage points - anyone who says they match exactly is blind, lying or delusional.


    [​IMG]

    Anyone with even average perception can see that this is 3D and cannot be idiotic scenery.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2022
  17. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
  18. AARguy

    AARguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2021
    Messages:
    13,961
    Likes Received:
    6,475
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Do you also believe the Holocaust was a hoax?
     
  19. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2022
  20. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,095
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which are you, anyone who says they match exactly is blind, lying or delusional. To anyone with eyes they are all different. But we've seen your dishonesty before when presented with irrefutable rebuttal.

    You have no integrity, you are not objective and you are the opposite of a truth seeker.

    You are n8t competent Enough to do this simple thing. Instead you actually rely on fraudulent con-artists, sucking in gullible and clueless people, like yourself.

    Pathetic cut and paste spam.
    https://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com/
    11. Never mind that - look over here: When this hopeless individual has exhausted his inept repertoire of responses comes his most used spam. He resorts to spamming his wall of crap and ignoring the main issue!
    "Anyway, there's a ton of proof that the missions were faked and zero proof that they were real."

    "Anyway, the hoax has already been proven by the anomalies I pointed out in post #xx so the "insert evidence" issue isn't about whether they faked it. It's about how they faked it."
     
  21. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
  22. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,095
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes I am, your dishonesty in literally 100s of cases! You link to an exchange where you exhibited your appalling integrity bypass:-

    There is such a thing as deductive reasoning and you seem to have a complete absence of this basic and easily acquired skill. From the video we can see a number of things:-
    • There is a plethora of dust. It is clearly and obviously covering most of the visible area. This is not up for debate, the film maker actually insists on it.
    • The lid for the sample container box is pushed shut. Again not up for debate, clearly visible.
    • It impacts the box and there is a small disturbance in the near corner. Again not up for debate, clearly visible.
    • A descending flat surface displaces air as it falls. Mainly in the direction of fall, but also to the sides. Similar to the draft from a closing door. Irrefutable and obvious.
    • There is not the slightest movement or displacement of any of the dust opposite to the direction the lid is falling. Nothing whatsoever!
    • In a vacuum, there would be no displaced air and subsequently no displaced dust. This is what is observed.
    • In a vacuum and low gravity, any impact vibrations would exaggerate the movements observed.
    • It is completely and irrefutably irrelevant which part of the lid impacts the box. We know it does impact because it stops!
    • Any lid falling onto a box must cause an impact force and it must be from the underside.
    Now from the responses being received from this serial forum spammer we can also see a number of things:-
    • Clearly he is diverting attention from the obvious lack of frontal air disturbance that is 100% unavoidable.
    • He keeps referring to the underneath impact point not being highlighted when it is 100% obvious this is how the collision works. It must be the underneath striking!
    • This dishonest person will never concede the absolute obvious, he will obfuscate and divert but will never admit his errors.


    The footage presented has now 100% irrefutably shown that the small segment highlighted must be in a vacuum. It almost certainly must also be in low gravity from the absurdly unnatural way the dust moves. The forum spammer has shot down in flames his own 15 years spammed claim!

    Further, since we now have proven that this sequence is in a vacuum, so must be the footage before and after this section. It's on the Moon.
     
  23. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,095
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No response as usual!
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2022
  24. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
  25. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,095
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is this statement correct:

    • There is a plethora of dust. It is clearly and obviously covering most of the visible area. This is not up for debate, the film maker actually insists on it.
    YES or NO?
     

Share This Page