Except I didn't post any of those. I posted these Taking over the city of Seattle by and armed force Burning down police departments Burning down federal buildings Beating on the doors of the SCOTUS to stop the swearing in of a justice Attacking Capital police at the White House Does it also include On Oct. 14, 2021, climate activists breached the Interior Department, with demonstrators who were left outside attacking law enforcement officers as they reportedly tried to force their way in, shouting “Go inside! Go inside!” while activists vandalized the building, while others pinned police against a wall. Does it also include On June 2020, then President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump, and their son Barron were rushed to a secure bunker when a group of protesters breached temporary barricades that had been set up around the White House complex. Does it also include The federal courthouse in Portland has been a repeated target of violent Antifa rioters. On July 2020, a mob began setting fires inside the fence protecting the courthouse, shaking the fence, launching projectiles over it, and even trying to take it down. Several people even breached it, with rioters launching projectiles and flashing lasers at the federal police officers who responded. Which every one CLEARLY fit into your insurrection post 18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. But you don't like it when the shoes on the other foot. Do you. lol
Which you posted no (zero) links to, so I posted information that shows the rioting was from across the political spectrum of These United States. Your problem is, none of the riots were against the authority of the United States or its laws, they were instigated to disrupt and peaceful protests against police brutality; as my links show. I've got "my" shoes on; thanks.
Oh yeah, I forgot. Its Noone I am posting too who has no clue about the city of Seattle being taken over, Doesn't know anything about burning down police departments Doesn't know anything about burning down federal buildings Doesn't know anything about beating on the doors of the SCOTUS to stop the swearing in of a justice Doesn't know anything about attacking Capital police at the White House For someone who post on a political website, you sure can't retain much information. If you don't know anything about the nations top news stories and need them repeated for you every time someone mentions one, maybe a political website isn't the place for you. Right, their isn't any laws against taking over the city of Seattle, burning down police departments, burning down federal buildings, or attacking Capital Police officers guarding the white house. lol
Yep, I'm the guy that's never let you get away with obfuscating what I post. And I never will, don't forget that either.
We know, the poster who can't recall a single event in history without a link. Then whines about the links provided Then claims he disputed post just for simply disagreeing with them Yeah, we all know who you are. lol
Condor, nobody gives a **** about your personal vendetta with me, go ... do whatever it is you do ... leave me alone. I'd let you win if it just wasn't so damn easy to beat you like a cheap drum. Thanks for bumping my thread.
No, it's not. DOJ, Suspicious Conspiracy for attacking our Capitol. That's some serious **** they're in, the "bogeyman" incarnate.
The person that brought all those people to DC was Donald Judas tRump; if you want to get right down to it. And, THAT'S, not debatable.
So is the below your analogy?? one or more persons commit a crime and one person one does not get arrested In your view it gives the right for other people to use it as an excuse for also breaking the law?? Example 2 guys each rob a bank…one guy gets caught, The guy that got caught then says since the other guy did not get caught he should not be punished
"THEY", don't confer with me. You should ask"THEM". But your point is well taken. Benedict Donald is so dirty, "THEY" are a lot of "THEM".
Talk about an imagination! I'm sure you can prove that, right? Before you answer, keep in mind I have looked into this in depth. And I've seen nothing that shows that Ray Epps "spearheaded" the attack. In fact, when the attacking started, he tried to stop people from attacking the police. He did run his mouth, the night before. Ok, your go!
don't need to it's already fact. Except reality or reject it that's your business then you're blind and deaf are you not going to try and teach you how to see or hear. BS.
Thanks for the insightful debate! Not sure how I've made it through life being blind and deaf, but at least I've learned how to BS people! By the way, your response is exactly what I expect from someone who can't back up what they claim. Much easier to ridicule someone than to actually show what you claim. I'll bet you're a scratch golfer, too!