Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Dec 21, 2011.
Please stop trolling.
It's trolling to answer a question with a direct source?
Strange criteria is strange.
When the question asks "who here can..." it is.
Now, who here can prove Flight 93 buried?
I'm here, and I can easily direct you to people who can tell you first hand. (that's known as evidence)
Do you have your phone handy?
But you have stated here on this forum that you thought it was a false flag operation and no plane crashed in Shanksville. Have you changed your mind?
Oh you mean like claiming to have evidence that Flight 93 debris were planted at Shanksville?
Probably they same way they would feel about someone claiming to have called the sources in Shanksville and further claiming the calls were never returned.
Please stop trolling. It's a bad example for you to set for your "teenagers."
I'll finish that for you:
...that you had evidence 93 buried.
Do you still, or do you retract that?
Please try to stay on topic. Not sure why it's so hard for you skeptics to do that?
It is not trolling to provide evidence.
My teens learned about that before they were teens.
When will you go directly to the source?
Correct. Got any evidence? I can't recall you posting any.
And PS, I'm asking for EVIDENCE, not "sources."
Ask one of your "teenagers" if you don't know what that means.
Do you think posts disappear when you ignore them?
EVERYONE can see what you claimed and wrote in the past. Ignoring it won't make it go away. Just like the evidence that you have been presented with in the past. The fact that you won't accept it won't make it go away.
You can be "shown" evidence but you can't be made to "see" it.
PS, Evidence resides with the sources. My teens know this, why can you not grasp the simple concept?
Do you need the numbers again?
Flame thread has run its course, don't you think?
Can you "show" me this evidence again? Bold it so I don't miss it.
So you do want the numbers again??
Just look through the six threads you started on the subject.
You have been shown numerous times already yet you continue to ignore it or dismiss it because the text claims the angle of the crash was 47° when you saw a report that says it was 45° or no reporter reported that Wally Miller was in the hole therefore he must not have been or some other such nonsense.
Then you turn around and ask for more as if you have any intention of looking at the evidence with an open mind.
It's all a big game to you yet you cry and complain to the mods when someone backs you into a corner or yanks your chain a bit or, Heaven forbid, points out lies that you have told in the past.
Patriot911 giving his "ASSumptions" doesn't count as evidence. So far, I don't recall any evidence posted that 93 buried.
Please post it again, or just say "I don't have any evidence." No shame in that.
killtown's "ASSumptions" don't count either.
Funny you should put it that way.
Do you evidence Flight 93 buried? yes or no
Personally in my possession?? No.
But it is available on the Internet. Try Google. I hear it is a pretty handy search engine.
Of course you will have to wade through all the bull(*)(*)(*)(*) truther garbage put together by basement-dwelling half-wits who think their amateur photo analysis skills and deductive "logical" reasoning means anything compared to evidence collected by crash scene workers.
Or better yet, look back through the six threads you started on the topic and review what was presented with an open mind.
If you're interested in the truth that is. If you want to continue playing games, go ahead, but don't whine to the mods when others join in the fun.
You guys sure seem to want to. Hypocrite much?
I"m not the one whining to the mods.
Not sure what you mean by that, but whatever.
Do you believe 93 buried?
Do you believe 93 buried?
Separate names with a comma.