"REAL" Fire Fighter, Erik Lawyer Slams NIST And The 9/11 "Investigation"

In a battle of wits, you can always count on koko to bring snacks.

 

yeh but troughers are like a timex, they take their beatin and keep on tickin

 

Like I said, snacks. Got something more fortifying than a bag of marshmallows?

 

yeh but they wont let me post it, sorry.

 

Jojo only brings what he finds in his trough.

 

bump for the blind

 

They being the voices in your head? Come on, don't hold back, we've endured your stupid countless times, so some unedited koko will be even more entertaining.

I know you take yourself seriously, but you're more a raging clown to most self-aware humans. By all means rage, rage against the dying of the light. Just don't forget to pile out of your tiny car first for maximum effect.

 

my my such vile hatred to those who sacrifice their time so diligently to keep the lunars on the path.

just sit down, take a deep breath, a few bottles of sleeping pills and everything will be better in the morning.



So what do you think about an expert fireman who condemns his brother fireman that wants to go by the book and do the job right?

 

Where are the angry masses of NYFD firefighters backing up your claims???

 

superficial argument

 

None of the NYFD support any truthers. The only fireman that does support truthers lives across the country and was a rookie to say the least. If you read Erik get his ass handed to him on the actual firefighters boards it's pretty funny. He argues with firemen that were on the scene that day, trying to tell them that they were wrong. He also tries to pass off the suggested code as a requirement for investigating fires, totally ignoring that there was no code or policy that was related to 9/11, since nothing even close to it had happened before.

Just stupid.

 

I did read and that is not true, that is your spin.

ad hominem attacks only make the attackers look like (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s, but then thats all it takes for a trougher to declare a win.

 

All that turd boy Lawyer has is ad homs. He thinks he knows better than actual investigators and people who were on site and more experienced than he is. The boy is jabbering about stuff well above his pay grade.

 

The dumb rookie failed to grasp that the manual is not even part of the fire codes and that there has never existed any reason to believe that anything other than what was observed caused the damage. The little turd is accusing his betters of a crime. He should stick to selling houses for a living.

 

You don't get to do that. I stated, as has every other fire fighter who has had the disgusting occasion to encounter turd boy Lawyer, that the manual has no force of law. You and turd boy thus have the obligation to show that there is any legal or ethical obligation to use it when the cause of an event is known.

 

It is always beneficial to get the advice from an expert.