Rittenhouse trial goes to opening statements after jury set

"What tears????? I didn't see one. Man knock it off! That boy ate some lemon heads before walking into court," -Lebron James

The dude is such a racist *******.

 

I truly didn't think anyone could be more ignorant than this prosecutor but you take the cake. The prosecutor isn't even arguing this because Nobody with a sane mind would understand someone saying a few guys chased a guy with a gun, knocked him down, hit him in the head with a skate board, kicked him in the face before getting shot, the other then proceeded towards him, kyle raised the gun, dumbass raised his hands, kyle lowered the gun, they dumbass lowers his hands lunges towards kyle, points his glock at kyle's head and now will have tennis elbow forever all which the video shows clearly, is somehow the victim. No-one in their right mind would say Kyle was the aggressor, that's a death sentence for the prosecutor because we all and the jury saw the video.

 

Now we have 3 less entitled brats rioting in the streets and burning businesses. Can't wait until Rittenhouse is found not guilty just to hear all those leftist crying about how they should have the right to riot and burn your business to the ground without interference.

I hope more people will now protect their businesses with weapons since the police can't do it because their mayors won't allow it.

 

Correct, what you and I think is irrelevant. The jury will decide, and I am 100% ok with their ruling.

That's why no one one bothers telling you that you are entitled. You are in denial about it, so why waste the time.

Who was with him when he shot the people? Why didn't that person KO that midget called Rosenbaum?

Kyle said he was alone, and afraid. His entire defense is founded on that argument. Why would you argue against it?

 

One white guy shoots a couple terrorists who were trying to kill him and the entirety of the leftist dictatorship goes to work to put him in prison for life.

Mob of blacks beat an old man with a bat and stab him nearly to death and the leftists go to work to defund police who are already stretched so thin they cant do anything to prevent this type of attack by these type of people because it happens literally every day.

 

To include GG testifying he didn't get shot until he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse.

When all else fails its the ole (I know you are but what am I) defense. lol
I'm not the one claiming Rittenhouses attackers are entitled to attack. Are you?

Which means what? He lost his right to self defense? Laughable

 

Watch the video and see your error or you just trying to tell everyone the video is lying to our eyes lol. You guys are something else. FACT: after the initial attack and dude got to met his maker, dumbass went towards kyle, raised his arms, kyle lowers weapon, elbow boy lowers his arms, points his gun at kyle's head and gets lifelong tennis elbow. These are the facts that the video confirms. Sure appears your trying to attack a kid due to politics and its f'ing sick.

 

Because that's not what Kyle said. Please show us that testimony or find a better source of info or clean out your ears because Kyle never said he was afraid until he was being chased, not when he was going to put out the fire by himself. Get it together dude your falsehoods are in the 100s in this thread.

 

When the evidence doesn't work, you going to just make it up now? His entire defense is founded on that argument?
His defense is not founded on him claiming to be alone and afraid.
His defense is founded on the video evidence of him being attacked by the entitled little brats that got shot.

And I hope it sends a clear message to the other entitled little rioting brats that Mommy can't help you when you are dumb enough to attack someone with an AR 15 because you think you have a right to do what ever the hell you want to do.

I see it as cleansing of the gene pool. Now they won't bred and make more entitled little rioting brats just like them.

 

He's mad because Kyle had the nerve to put out a fire at a BLM protest. Just like those who attacked Kyle were mad. At a time in which every citizen knows their city could burn. The lesson the left wants is: even if police won't prevent your city from burning, and even if you are not being provocative, don't dare attempt to interfere with the protest, even with a fire extinguisher.

That message must be denounced.

 

He wanted to use graphic imagery but then switched to over penetration on FMJ to shore up his reckless charge against mcginnis attempt.

 

Obviously, nobody in their right mind is going to hire armed mercenaries to surround their property.
And, in any event, no civilized city would allow it.

As far as "protecting their businesses with weapons"?
People do it RIGHT NOW (All the time).
Is that news to you?

And, if the guy at the Liquor Store Kills someone trying to rob him--It goes the the Prosecutor for a charging decision.

Of course, your example has NOTHING to do with KR.
Since KR was NOT "Protecting His Business".

Feel free to try again.

 

You are the only one parroting stuff about entitled people, and usually such obsessions stem from projection. Obviously the incident had nothing to do with entitlement. How silly.

Of course not. It means what is says: He was alone and afraid. I have no idea why the other poster insists he was not alone. Being afraid is grounds for self defense claim, but the jury has to believe it in order to pass "not guilty" verdict.

You guys sound like people who declare winners of football games a day before the game. There is a reason why they play the game, and there is a reason why they hold trials. They determine the winners and losers. Very simple.

 

And yet over-penetration was not an issue with any of the shots fired. I suppose he's trying to make a case for reckless endangerment. Seems like a pretty lame argument.

 

Yeah?
Well...
The topic of THIS thread is Rittenhouse.

Just more "Whataboutusm"? Wow.

Anyway, whatever the jury decides is fine by me.

And, things that happened anywhere else were dealt with by local authorites.
(And, those incidents, in other places, have nothing to do with the case that is the topic of THIS thread).

The Latest:

Judge being dragged for being a " Racist Disgrace":

The judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse murder case jokes in court that he hopes the "Asian food" that they ordered isn’t "on one of those boats in Long Beach harbor" as if all Asian food is imported from overseas.

 

why am I not shocked about this hilarious claim of racism? You do know this REALLY waters down and already over used term, yes?

 

Even more silly is you making fake claims about projection. lol
I called them entitled, which is what they are. Entitled brats rioting and burning businesses in the streets thinking they have a right to do so.

The only projections being noted are yours.

The defense didn't use Rittenhouse being alone and scared as their foundation for self defense. You just made that up.
Their foundation for self defense is Rittenhouse being attacked. Had he just shot someone standing around who was not attacking him, they might use he was afraid and alone. But when you have overwhelming evidence in dozens of videos of Rittenhouse being actually attacked, they don't need to prove he was afraid or alone as to why he shot them.
He shot them because they attacked him.

Yeah, right. I don't need to have someone replay the game to know what the score was two days ago.
I have seen the actual videos
I have heard the testimony
I have seen the prosecutions illegal attempts to get a witness to change his testimony
I have seen the prosecutors try and reinvent what happened
I have seen the prosecutors get their heads ripped off by the judge for their improper conduct
The conclusion is right in the video. I don't need you or a jury to tell me what I think, what I saw, or what I heard.
I can think for myself especially when the evidence is this overwhelming.

 

Can someone clarify a couple of points for me?
1. Was Rittenhouse legally in possession of his rifle?
2. Was the 3rd guy he shot legally in possession of his handgun?

 

Educated People KNOW BETTER than to even attempt to predict the outcome of a Trial.
Whether it involves Rodney King, OJ Simpson, or Derek Chauvin.

That is why it is beyond laughable when anybody is thinking that THEIR "Opinion" of how the jurors will decide matters (in the least).

The ONLY "Opinions" that matter are among the People on the Jury.

 

yes.
no.

 

Regarding #1, this trial is happening, in part, to determine that. From what I've read in the law, I would vote "not guilty" on the weapon possession charge, but the jury isn't going to be able to read the black letter law, they're going to get "jury instructions" on the matter, if the judge allows the charge to go forward (there's an open motion by the defense to dismiss it).
#2: no, he does not appear to have been (his CCW was suspended / revoked / "not valid").

 

Self defense claim is founded on the defendants having "genuine fear of imminent physical harm". Yesterday Kyle must have repeated 30 times that he was afraid that he was going get killed. That is that their defense is founded upon, as it should.

And he was afraid he was going to get killed.

You disagree for the sake of disagreeing. Why? What I am saying is obviously true, and and its necessary for his defense. If it was NOT true, then Kyle is walking on thin ice, having lied his ass out yesterday.

The point flew a mile over your head.

You haven't seen the verdict. No one has

You sure are one emotional beast, aren't you.

No, but that does not make him guilty of murder, it makes him guilty of a much lesser charge.

 

Sure. Obviously, it seems like PC Run Amok.
BUT, it was an ill-advised remark because it gives the Judge's detractors something to latch onto..

I DIDN'T say that I agreed with it.
I was just pointing it out.

 

Okay, I've had three answers and they're all different? Did he legally possess his rifle or not?

 

Yes, for some reason this case makes people burst with emotion, and I remember seeing the same thing with Chauvin's case. I have seen self defense cases here in Florida go both ways, so you never know how the jury sees the situation. The jury hears less than what we see on TV (the judge is constantly sending them in and out of the courtroom to discuss things with the lawyers), and they don't have access to the media to read opinions (professional or not).

They say opinions are like butt-holes, - everyone's got one.

No, but it doesn't make him guilty of murder.