Rittenhouse trial goes to opening statements after jury set

Alone and afraid isn't his defense. He feared his life was threatened because people were attacking him. That goes beyond feels into reality and deliberate actions taken by those who were shot.

Don't attack people with guns. That's my life lesson advice for you.

 

Exactly.

And, once again, to your point:

Any attempt to predict what a Jury is thinking, is the definition of a Fool's Errand.

 

I noticed something in the trial where the prosecution was accusing Drew Hernandez as posting videos that show kyle as being innocent. It was an attempt to try and show bias, but all it did for me is show that the prosecution thinks the video evidence shows Kyle as innocent.

The prosecutions interpretation of the videos shows Kyle as innocent so If any of the Jurors picked up that then there is no chance of getting past reasonable doubt when the prosecution just admitted to reasonable doubt

 

Sounds like he did not. He got his friend to purchase it, and he was going to buy it back when he reached 18.

 

He was afraid of being killed while being ATTACKED.
Not because he was just scared. lol

I watched his entire testimony. I didn't hear anything from him that was a lie. What was he lying about when you claim he was lying his ass off?

Yet you couldn't figure out what my answer was? Your point was nothing is decided until there is a verdict.
My point was with what I have seen thus far, I don't need a verdict to make up my mind as to what I have seen.
And you are claiming things going over others heads?

I don't need a verdict to figure out if the guy is guilty or not.

 

There is an argument being made that the law is not clear on this, perhaps why you've received different answers. The judge has said he will consider dropping this charge although the jury will be going into deliberation soon and this charge is apparently still in play. I don't know.

 

The group Rittenhouse was with was armed but that does not make them a mob.

Grosskreutze was a viuollent rioter with lengthy history of felonies.

He attacked Rittenhouse which is proven fact you absolutely deny in a willful manner

 

Just in case anyone wants to learn about the people Kyle had to defend himself from

 

Say it ain't so. I heard they were in church with their grandmothers when they heard a noise outside, walked out of the church, and were gunned down by the criminal homicidal maniac Rittenhouse.

 

Ok let's make this real simple for you based on WHEN EXACTLY Kyle said he was in fear.

When Pedo tells him if he gets him alone he'll kill him then see's him again, chases him to where he had no place to go, lunged at him and grabbed his gun barrel, do you not think it's reasonable to be afraid.

when he's running from a mob to the police, get's hit in the head with a skate board knocked to the ground then kicked in the face and was on the ground. Do you think it's reasonable he was afraid.

Then finally immediately after he killed the skateboard wielding gy he turns and EMT guy is there with a gun coming towards him, he raises his gun, guy raises his hands, kyle lowers his gun, guy lowers his hands comes at him and points the pistol at his head. Do you think it's reasonable he was afraid?

Those are the times Kyle in the trial said he was afraid, which one do you think he wasn't fearing for his life? Stop interjecting alternative facts and let's get to bottom line on the facts here.

 

You don't exactly have the best track record of making predictions

 

I think Mr Gaige can forget about his $10M, and start thinking about what Rittenhouse is going to ask for his civil trial, which I would file the day after my exoneration.

 

Could it be when he chose to fire his rifle?

The only thing that I am saying is that HE WAS AFRAID, and now you argue as if I said the opposite. How is this so complicated for you?

What are you arguing about? Or are you disagreeing just for the sake of disagreeing.

 

The judge also stopped the prosecution two days ago and instructed the jury that don't take the version of the law as the absolute truth. He would give them the law and how it's intended before they deliberate and the prosecution and defense may have versions that aren't accurate lol.

He legally could have a loaded gun with supervision, there were times he didn't have supervision so it's down to was legal who he came with, yes, was it legal when he got separated? Seems like a tough sale because then you would have to decide how far away can the supervision be? Keep in mind it's used mainly with hunting. If dad takes his 17 year old son, drops him off to deer hunt drives a mile away and hunts the other side of the farm does that mean the son is now illegal? Of course not he went hunting with his supervisor and his supervisor gave him the rifle, just like Kyle. No where does it say they have to be side by side, that would mean every kid that hunts deer in Minnesota could be convicted.

 

Hes a filthy communist and therefore a liar as well.

Rachel Maddow will have him on her show so they can both lie and outrage their audience of the uninformed.

And so it goes.

 

No you and the defense were trying to say that he was running around afraid and why he shot those people. No he was afraid in those moments like anyone else in the world would be. It's the same argument that was crushed in court. You literally have witness testifying that while he was alone he was asking and treating injuries, he wasn't afraid until thugs attacked him. That's the testimony, that's what the video shows and that's what every person that testified that was at the rally testified, even elbow boy victim.

 

I am saying he was afraid for his life (which is what Kyle also said), which is the bases of his self defense case. It is a valid claim.

You disagree, and I am ok with that.

Happy?

 

Now they are the only kind of good commies.

 

I like this channel because the commentators are all lawyers.

 

You said kyle said he was afraid when separated and that's not what he said. Let me be clear, my issue with you is distorting what the testimony and video clearly shows. I have no problem with you believing this or that but distorting exactly what was said or shows and I will challenge you on the facts.

 

Except he said the reason he tried to go to safety is because he got separated.

 

Well except for not testifying Kyle pointed his gun at him and admitting he pointed his gun at Kyle you might have something.

 

1. At this time, he is innocent of any gun charges so it doesn't matter. If they want to bring up gun charges later, it still will not matter for this case.
2. Doesn't matter. He pointed a gun (legal or not) at Rittenhouse. That is cause enough to get yourself shot. If they want to bring gun charges later, it still will not matter to this case.

 

People arguing about Kyle being guilty of murder are the same idiots who couldn’t assess reality and facts when it came to Trayvon. And here we have all this video showing it clear as day.

It’s really simple. If all Kyle wanted to do was kill
random people, he could have done it without anyone even knowing…from afar in the shadows. Hit and run. Hit and Run. He wouldn't have put himself at the scene, talking to loads of people, that’s for sure or tried to put out fires, assist the injured, ect.

Biggest case of self defense you could get. And as usual the people shot are of course model citizens…again

 

I said he was alone and afraid, and that is a fact. He said that. I don't care what you read into it, because you obviously argue for the sake of arguing.