Rtwingafraud, is the left wing also a fraud?

It was hit by more than just a 'piece'.....geeze you troofers will minimalize ANYTHING to guard your fantasies

 

Then you're completely ignorant of how WTC was damaged by the Towers debris, how it affected the structural integrity of column 15 and how the collapse was initiated.

 

No, you're completely sucked in by propaganda and specialized rhetoric, fashioned and geared for people like you.

 

...and you lack the intellectual capacity, education and knowledge to understand the science and physics behind the events of WTC. Stick to Alex Jones World of Cartoon News for Morons.

 

The science is one of the very things that disproves the 'official' nonsense. Buildings don't fall straight down into their own footprints, from fire, and near free fall speeds only happen in a vacuum, inside a laboratory. Alex makes a helluva lot more sense than disinformation specialists.

 

First, they didn't fall down in their own footprint. Second, attempting to stretch the term "free fall speeds" to apply the actual times of the collapse, is dishonest.

So far, you're 0/2.

 

WTC 7 DID.

NIST finally admitted a period of free fall during WTC7's designed implosion. Seems you're the 0/2 batter.

 

You are not telling the truth so you need to cite your source so we can verify your 'inaccurate' statement, because calling you a liar, would be improper so, we won't do that but, please, stop speaking untruths.

 

NIST even admitted free fall. Do you deny that?

 

What exactly IS 'free fall speed'?

 

Refer to NIST, and get their explanation on why they called it 'free fall'. You won't believe anything that I post anyway so, why ask?

 

I asked YOU,not the nist.....YOU keep using the word

 

But you reject everything I say outright, just like the right rejects anything Obama has to say, so, why not ask you "official" source, rather than me, who you won't believe, regardless? Maybe you just want to stir up nonsense, rather than seek actual truth.

 

You are not telling the truth so you need to cite your source so we can verify your 'inaccurate' statement, because calling you a liar, would be improper so, we won't do that but, please, stop speaking untruths.

 

Determined not to answer,are you?

 

Determined not to do the shill dance, of circular rhetoric, and the specialist's goal of NOT focusing too closely on any one specific.

 

I've read that five times. It makes about as much sense as a nursery rhyme.

 

Shillery doesn't make any sense. It isn't supposed to.

 

No,it's YOU that doesn't make any sense

Making your unwillingness to answer a question,MY fault somehow

 

I wasn't talking about "shillery." I was talking about your post.

Are you telling us that you are a shill and that your own posts are shillery?

 

No, they're nursery rhymes designed to help him sleep. See one day he is all about Judy Wood and her magical space beam, that can turn steel to dust! Another day he may be in the mood for Jones and Harrit and their super duper hush a boom nano-therm(insert vowel of the week here)te. This stuff is so incredible its an incindiery that produces explosions! Then sometimes it is Richard Gage, an architect with no high-rise design to his credit, who travels the world, on other people's dime demanding a new investigation with cardboard boxes as evidence. One hell of a storybook.