Russia Warns Britain: "Do Not Tempt Fate"

To me the incident was engineered and initiated by the British government to distract from the vile, corrupt, racist, immoral thieving incompetents masquerading at running the country.
Racist Boris Johnson said that British ships have every right to go from A to B, and guess what, they were able to go from A to B.
Why that particular A and that particular B is unexplained, however in real conflict Russia would swat away any British conventional forces without even ruffling the creases in their trousers.
Britain is a sad sick man trying to cope with post Empire delusion that is rapidly spinning into cultural dementia.

 

Sidestepped, again, did ya?

 

Ignoring the obvious.

In any conflict it is going to fight Britain would be actively supported by the United States.

 

Congratulations on getting a Mr. Bean GIF from her.

You and Putin are just angry that our leaders are not indifferent to Russian aggression towards neighboring countries and are using targeted and effective, yet peaceful measures to counter that aggression.

If our leaders were anything like you say, surely they would have invaded Russia to topple Putin by now. His joke of a military could not stop the US military. Not even close. It would amount to a speed bump on the way to Moscow.

 

Russia states that Crimea is a Russian territory.
Britain does not recognize that Crimea is a Russian territory and the British government sends its warship to waters near Crimea.
Who provokes whom in this case?

For example, tomorrow Russia declares that it does not recognize that Northern Ireland is a British territory (as we know, some Irishmen do not recognize it too) and a Russian warship will be sent to waters near Northern Ireland.
Who will provoke whom in this case?

 

Hitler tried to liberate the Russians from the evil antichrist church destroying mass murdering marxist bolsheviks by mass murdering 20 million Russians. Don't you find something wrong with that?

Tejas - Please give me one quote by Vladimir Putin where he praised Stalin - as you said many times, and where he said anything complimentary about Marxism?

It seems you're being highly deceived by someone or something. As for Adolph Hitler, he was not a Christian, he was a pagan because 'nationalism' is self glorification and a sin. Patriotism in contrast is a virtue. Adolph Hitler was possessed, as was Lenin since they were demagogues. It's where their power came from.

As for Stalin, I don't know since he did open the churches during the war. A nun said she didn't know whether the following is true or not, but when the Germans were outside of Moscow, Stalin didn't know whether he should leave the city. Someone told him to ask Saint Matrona so he did. She told him that the Germans will not enter, but he has to open all the churches.

The churches throughout Russia opened overnight. Was it because of the Saint, we don't know, but as soon as Khruschev took over, all the churches were closed again.

 

Russia always gives tit for tat responses. As an example, every sanction we imposed on Russia so we can hurt them economically, has always been responded to in an equal way by Russia.

Recently though, Vladimir Putin said that their responses to our actions, will now be more assertive. I guess they feel that they are now militarily powerful enough to do that. Since Britain is not willing to recognize the referendum of the Russian people in Crimea, then Russia will not recognize Northern Ireland as being part of Britain.

We have also been having war games off the coast of Russia in the North Sea, Baltic Sea and Black Sea, so Russia decided it would now have war games 30 miles off Pearl Harbor and practice how to sink an American air craft carrier - a game they managed quite successfully.



Bismarck - With the Russian is to play fair, or do not play.

 

Was it tit-for-tat when Putin invaded and stole Crimea? All you're doing is enabling misbehavior by making such excuses for it.

 

There is an Irish Political Party which still does not recognize the validity of the partition of Ireland (see the citation bellow).
I believe that it can be a ground for Russia to send its troops or warships to Northern Ireland.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Sinn_Féin

 

As I have already said repeatedly on this forum... Putin has created and constantly promotes an entirely new antichrist religion that glorifies evil church-destroying mass-murdering marxist antichrist Stalin and Stalin's antichrist marxist victory over Hitler the ONE world leader who had the will, ability and courage to stand up and fight against evil antichrist marxists to liberate Christian Russia from the antichrist marxists.

Not only that... but now Putin has built a new BLACK "military church" on the spot outside Moscow where Hitler's courageous Christian sword was stopped by antichrist Stalin's red army. Putin's new BLACK military "church" embodies his new evil antichrist Stalinist religion... and usurps, perverts and blasphemes traditional Russian Orthodox Christianity to glorify antichrist marxist Stalin.

.

 

You're forgetting the first annexation which was against their will. It was in 1991 when Ukraine grabbed Crimea, even though the people voted in a referendum to be autonomous. There was not a peep then from the US, even though 89% of the people living in Crimea were not Ukrainians. They were Russians.

In 2014, after the Nazis killed some Crimeans returning from Kiev, and after the Nazis threatened to go to Crimea to do the same to the rest of the population, the Crimean people declared their independence. They asked the Russians stationed there to protect them until a referendum could be held.

The referendum gave them 2 choices, independence or joining Russia. They chose Russia. That way they would be protected from Kiev.

https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2017/03/28/so-who-annexed-crimea-peninsular-then/

 

It would mean war, so I don't think Russia would do that - although it would serve them right.

 

The March 16 referendum's available choices did not include keeping the status quo of Crimea and Sevastopol as they were at the moment the referendum was held. The 1992 constitution accords greater powers to the Crimean parliament, including full sovereign powers to establish relations with other states; therefore, many Western and Ukrainian commentators argued that both provided referendum choices would result in de facto separation from Ukraine.​

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum

Some "choice." As for the rest:

UPI ARCHIVES
MARCH 17, 1995
Ukraine reins in rebellious Crimea

KIEV, March 17 -- The Ukrainian parliament Friday voted to rein in its province of Crimea, sharply curbing its legislative and executive powers and abolishing the post of president on this restive peninsula situated on the Black Sea. In a vote of 246-55 the Ukrainian legislature annulled the Crimean constitution of March 1992, as well as a number of Crimean laws judged in conflict with federal laws. Ukrainian lawmakers instructed the Crimean parliament to draw up a new charter for review to ensure it complies with Ukraine's constitution. The Ukrainian parliament also called for new elections in the self- governing province, with a vote slated for April 29. Federal lawmakers instructed Ukraine's chief prosecutor to bring criminal proceedings against Crimean President Yuri Meshkov for 'exceeding the authority of his office.' Meshkov has pushed the predominantly Russian populated Crimea away from Kiev, asserted more autonomy for the province, vowed to establish closer links with Moscow, and generally antagonized Ukrainian federal authorities, though he has also feuded recently with his own parliament, which itself gets along poorly with Kiev. The dispute between Kiev and Crimea has been further fueled since the Soviet breakup by nationalists in Russia who covet the resort-dotted peninsula granted as a gift to Ukraine in 1954 by Soviet leader Nikita Krushchev though it was long Russian. Crimea's status has been further complicated because the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet -- disputed between Russia and Ukraine -- is on Crimea. The Ukrainian parliament also voted to have the Justice Ministry produce a draft pact between Ukraine and Russia regarding the status of the Black Sea Fleet on the territory of Ukraine by April 10.​

... https://www.upi.com/Archives/1995/03/17/Ukraine-reins-in-rebellious-Crimea/7481795416400/

Russia has been angling to get Crimea back for a long time.

 

.

Russia has had two close encounters by two destructive fireballs... one in 1908 and one in 2013.

There may be a third on its way.

.

 

More and more depending on how far into the future you want to go, and Lawdy knows how many they had prior to Tunguska.

 

Even unto a war against the Republic of Ireland?

 

​

And the people of Crimea have been angling to be back with Russia for a long, long time. You realize that the Russians there speak Russian, conduct their business in Russian, go to school in Russia and marry Russians.

When asked in polls whether they still wanted to be part of Russia, the answer was always yes.

 

The 1908 meteor might have been a harbinger warning of the coming 1917 revolutions 9 years later..

The 2013 meteor might be a harbinger warning for 2022 = Putin's 70th birthday.

.

 

Of course.

 

I don't think the Irish here will like that.

I don't think so either!​

 

Or they might have nothing at all to do with politics.

 

And I don't care what a sycophant for the Russians and religious fanatic thinks like you thinks.

 

I have news for you, the Resurrection of Christ Cathedral is not black, it's bronze. Take a good look! Also please tell me where you see Stalin? I see Christ.

 

I figured you saw Putin.

 

Looks like NATO is planning to give Putin the middle finger.

https://gcaptain.com/crimea-nato-black-sea-navy/