S.F. gay rights advocate arrested over child porn

First Milk now this guy. You guys love having holidays for child molesters don't you.

 

Hmmm I don't remember ever hearing about a holiday for this guy- maybe you are thinking of Jerry Sandusky- the treasured heterosexual icon of macho sports?

Of course Milk was never accused of, arrested for, or convicted of child pornography or child molestation like Jerry Sandusky or Brinklin.

However, your selective outrage is noted. Me? I hope all child molesters and child pornographers are arrested, convicted, and sent to the Big House- regardless of whether they champion Gay Rights or championship football.

If this guy is guilty I hope he does hard time.

 

Just stop with the bigotry.

 

Dear god.

One person sets a trend!

 

1) If he's guilty, then he should convicted and sentenced appropriately.

2) I've never heard of the guy.

3) One or a few examples of bad behavior by members of the gay population result in the judgment that all gay people are pedophiles/child molesters. One or a few examples of bad behavior by members of the straight population are judged as outliers that don't reflect on the the entire demographic. I call that bigotry.

 

I agree, not much else to be said.

 

LOL!! Ha-Ha!!

 

You didn't read this part of the quote

and your ignoring the fact that California is trying to bring in Harvey Milk day, or was on another thread here.

 

You mean San Francisco celebrated someone before he was suspected of receiving child pornographer? That would be like Penn State celebrating Jerry Sandusky before he was accused of child abuse wouldn't it? Clearly we can't celebrate anyone until we know that they will never be accused of a crime....

"and your ignoring the fact that California is trying to bring in Harvey Milk day, or was on another thread here"

Ignoring what? As I point out repeatedly, Jerry Sandusky, husband, step-father, heterosexual macho icon, sports legend was accused, arrested, and convicted of sex crimes against children. Brinkin- Gay activist- has been accused and arrested of possessing child pornography.

Harvey Milk? Never accused, never arrested, never convicted of any sex crimes, against children or anyone else.

I will repeate what you ignored

Of course Milk was never accused of, arrested for, or convicted of child pornography or child molestation like Jerry Sandusky or Brinklin.

However, your selective outrage is noted. Me? I hope all child molesters and child pornographers are arrested, convicted, and sent to the Big House- regardless of whether they champion Gay Rights or championship football.

If this guy is guilty I hope he does hard time.

So do you only care about child abuse or pornographers if they are Gay activists?

 

It always amuses me that any time someone who claims to be something associated with the Democratic Party does something stupid or illegal, the right pounces on it as "proof" that we're all child molesting socialist Muslims.

Turn around and do the same to them and they'll play the victim.

 

Opening post didnt say a thing about the Democratic party. But you are probably safe in YOUR assumption that he is a Democrat and that the Board of Supervisors who declared "Larry Brinkin Week" were also Democrats.

 

Stop trying to vilify homosexual people.

 

good grief. I do not see where the OP even mentioned the Democrat party.

 

Sandusky was having gay sex with young boys thus; gay

 

They are partisan.

Therefore, they lack critical thinking skills.

 

No, he was perpetrating sexual abuse on children who were male, thus: a child molester and likely a pedophile.

To equate same-sex orientation with pedophilic orientation and characterize acting on the latter in molestation of a child as "gay sex" is a purposeful misapplication of the term "gay" and makes your bigotry all the more apparent.

 

you read way too much into it and do the usual personal attacks which are now expected from you.

Obviously Sandusky is a sick mofo who also happens to enjoy gay sex; thus gay. Is he a gay pedophile, yes. Is he a gay abuser, yes. Is he vermin, wormslime, a piece of ship..............yes yes and yes. Are all gay people like that; absolutely not.

Just like all heterosexual men are not rapists

 

Sandusky has been married to his wife for 46 years thus heterosexual.

Sandusky raped a child thus: pedophile

This is what irritates me about the 'gay' haters- a man rapes a 10 year old girl and they not only don't say "he is a heterosexual because he rapted a 10 year old girl" they don't even notice. Where is the thread you have started condemning a straight man for getting caught with child pornography.

The "gay" haters search out instances where they can label a crime "gay" in order to attack all homosexuals. This is not only a cheap tactic, but this diverts attention from the actual crime and victims- which inevitably are men who sexually assault children- usually girls.

The attackers are pedophiles, the victims children. Don't lose sight of that.

 

Absolutely. Only conservatives can be villified. Well, and jews. We can vilify jews all we want. So, jews and conservatives. Well, and males as long as they're not gay. So, jews, conservatives, and males. They can be vilified, too. Oh, and white folks or as we like to call them, blue-eyed devils. And, people who work and pay taxes. They can be vilified. That's okay. And, Christians. They can be vilified but not as much as jews and Moslems can't be vilified at all. I almost forgot Southerners. They can be vilified in spades if they're white. If they live in Mississippi you get bonus points for vilifying them. Rich people. We can not only vilify rich people but we can actually hate them. Well, unless they're rich liberals. Then you cannot vilify or hate them even if they're white or males or not gay.

But, it does get confusing sometimes because who we're free to vilify and who were not keeps shifting.

And I highly recommend Diversity Training. I was sent to a three-day program by my boss and that's where I learned who it is was okay to vilify.

 

As usual, you try to find some way to escape the implications of your own statements. I am not fooled by this, and I suggest no one else should be either.

What basis do you have for saying he enjoys gay sex?

Mutually exclusive terms. "Gay" is an orientation toward the same sex, generally age-appropriate. Pedophile is an orientation toward pre-pubescent children. You might be able to make the argument that he is a "homosexual pedophile", as "homosexual" is a broader term than "gay". The preference a pedophile shows for male children may have a very different basis from the orientation of a gay man toward adults of the same sex. Moreover, pedophilia is often about expressing power through sex; it has little in common with the desire for a fully formed relationship between adult equals that many gay men seek. Child molesters seek out victims based in part on accessibility, and focus on children with malleable personalities who are unlikely to report the molestation.

So if you're going to try to apply the word "gay" hereafter to someone's pedophilia, you can expect me to continue to characterize that as a purposeful, bigoted misrepresentation.

 

Then all bisexuals are really heterosexuals. Have I got that about right?

 

Excellent points.

Let me go further- to call what Sandusky did "gay sex" is the equivelent of calling a man raping a 10 year old girl 'heterosexual sex".

Let me ask all of you heterosexuals out there- are you sexually attracted to 10 year old girls? If not- how can that be heterosexual sex?

Pedophiles are sexually attracted to children- non-pedophiles are not. It is not that hard of a concept. If you are confused, look at who you are attracted to, go from there.

 

I was actually being somewhat ironic- I actually realize that saying Sandusky is heterosexual just because he was married is as absurd as calling him gay because he raped 10 year old boys.

In actuality, how pedophiles identify themselves when they aren't raping children is immaterial- straight husband, gay activist- they are all pedophiles and I hope they are convicted and locked away

 

Perriquine: "What basis do you have for saying he (Sandusky) enjoys gay sex?"

You're joking, right? He criminally assaults, at obviously great risk, young boys and has sex with them as a gay person would and you are under the impression he didn't like it. How strange. Are you going to now take the position that Geoffrey Dahlmer was repulsed at eating human flesh?

 

Revealing how that only works when a pedophile is labeled as gay, but they dont have any problem with labeling him a heterosexual. Pedophillia becomes a sexual orientation unto itself whenever its men diddling boys.