So what?????????????????????? We are 2013 and Jews do not have Sunday mass nor confessionals. We deal directly and not through any intermediaries especially Poles planted with their heads in the ground.
Who cares what some old book said ? Turn your question to those who wrote that book. Shariah tells worse. The difference is that Muslims are killing other Muslims by the thousands. Jews do not.
How many Jews live and die by the Talmud ? 90% ? 50% ? 3% ? How many Muslims live IN EUROPE and die by the Shariah ?
Poppyc@ck ! the word "democracy " doesn't have the same meaning in the racists Zionist state , as it means in "Western democratic countries " Israel declared itself as a " Jewish state " Herzl's DER JUDENSTAAT hence a "democracy " ONLY for "Jews" + Mamzers , those pseudo/quasi 's / half-quarter, etc., who claim to be "Jews" "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan." — Revelation 2:9 (wink) ....
1.No it does not 2.The bible also says that jews should not tattoo themselves. Do you want to count how many jews have tattoos?
Poppyc@ck ! Iran is not called "Islamic Republic" ? Give us a break. You Muslim Arabs have 52 countries, isn't it enough for you ?? Leave Europe and Israel alone and get out !!!
Did you read it? you are victim to anti-semite propaganda, the least you could have done is check it for yourself like I did, The Talmud is an asseble of debates between Rabbis, each giving his own perspective on how to live according to the Bible while in Exile/without a Temple and Senadrin (elders courthouse), it this case the debate was on the commandnment "shall not kill", the rabbies asked if it stands in all cases like self defence etc', regardless of reason - one Rabbi said a jew must never kill another jew according to the law no matter what but it doesnt stand on non-jews, that doesnt mean Jews can start a murder spree on non jews....that's just dumb Muslim propaganda possibly because their own Quran is filled with hatered to other faiths.
In Israel, around 10% "live and die" according to the Talmud, ofc the Talmud is not what the local Nazi militia in this forum lie about, I confronted you on that once and you fled...
In Israel of 2009 around 8% , dont know about the USA. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Israel
Then I assume that on other forums you fight your heart out against Iran regime, Syria and other tyranies and you save this forum just for Israel, right ? Ta ta
"You Muslim Arabs"? Once again folks here we have the ridiculous and infantile notion that anyone with an opposing point of view must, by default, be a Muslim!
"So what"? An atrocity is committed, your countrymen are held to blame for a massacre and all you can say is "so what"? That is precisely the sort of disgustingly glib dismissal we hear from anti-Semites whenever the Holocaust is brought up. You're in the company of your peers, it seems. And what is this irrelevant nonsense about confessionals, mass and intermediaries? In fact you deal with intermediaries all the time; not a single initiative vis-a-vis the peace process has come from Israel. Not one; all of them were initiated by third parties.
Persecute the murderers in international court and Israelis will also take responsibility but I resent the highlight on Israel as you wrote above, its a lynch party and I wont honor that.
You resent that Israel's Kahan Commission found Sharon to bear 'personal responsibility' for the massacres? Why would you do that-surely you should be celebrating justice being done, no?
Im not exalting Sharon for his part....Im saying that you dont get to wear the Persecutor robe and wig before you have the murderer in the court house.
If you are correct, why did Begin not attack the Abu Nidal organisation in its base in Syria? Why lie to the Knesset and launch a massive invasion on Lebanon. You know that this excuse was total trash. You were shown that here - http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=313440&page=10&p=1062968025#post1062968025 You were shown that the perpetrator of that assassination attempt, the Abu Nidal organisation, was the sworn enemy of the PLO. You were shown that that it had (and continued seeking) to kill senior PLO members. As late as January 1991 this was still the case, only stopping with Abu Nidal’s death. But Begin, like you, blamed the PLO who was scrupulously observing the Habib ceasefire!! That was debated on this very Forum and has been sealed sent to the bank for failure of any substantive rebuttal. You were shown that Abu Nidal was sentenced to death ‘in abstentia’ by the PLO in 1974. Here – have a refresher course – click here. Having to dredge up this sad and tattered old MYTH shows just how empty the Zionist quivers are. Next!!
Being a BY-STANDER???? The IDF was a BY-STANDER in the massacre? MYTH ALERT!!! MYTH ALERT!!! MYTH ALERT!!! Let us take Erskine Childers advice, shall we. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/17/o...?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20120917&_r=0 This kind of allow is not a passive verb. You need to actually stand-aside and take a conscious decision not to exercise your sworn duty. Those are NOT the actions of an innocent bystander That is not the action of an innocent bystander!! Apologists - please read the first three words again. Here are the words of the leader of the innocent bystanders:
Your personal attacks and pro Arab hasbara will not change my opinion. Adress the issue or back off. 1) Iran is not called "Islamic Republic" ?? 2) ONLY Arabs killed other Arabs in Sabra and Shatila !!!
Who is arguing about what Iran is? Not me. Christian Arabs committed the massacre. The refugee camps were under the protection (you understand what that word means), of the IDF. The IDF allowed the Lebanese to commit the atrocity in the full knowledge-as Kahan confirmed-that bloodshed was inevitable. If you don't like what Israeli law decided was right and wrong I suggest you voice your complaint to the relevant authorities. I'm sick to death of your pathetic wriggling in the face of undeniable facts. Israel was found to be indirectly responsible for the massacres. Sharon, as defence minister, was found to bear personal responsibility for ignoring the obvious; that allowing the Phalangists to enter the camp would inevitably lead to the massacre. Here, once again, is something for you to ignore: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahan_Commission
