Scant Evidence That Clinton Had Malicious Intent

What do you mean "not meant for classified information" who told you that? And she was told by the cyber security experts she WAS endangering such security using her email server for ALL he communication without regard to classified information when she refused to use a proper server with proper security.

If she was so stupid to not know she would be dealing with classified information why on earth would you elect her President? You should be working for the Trump campaign coming up with these smears of Clinton.

 

The first three months her server did not even have basic encryption, classified information was sent as mere text files anyone could open with Windows Notepad. And flat out wrong all her emails have been released to the public the State Department just released another hundredast week after ANOTHERawsuit had to be files. She has withheld, lied they even existed and obfuscated for months.

- - - Updated - - -

Post reported.

 

That leaves 10% doesn't it.

 

Leftists believe that, just like Barry Sotero Obama, Hillary Clinton is above the law and doesn't have to obey and follow the same security laws and procedures everyone else has to follow. Period! That's what their whole defense, in a nutshell. She is special and occupies a space where the law of the common
folk does not apply to her.

She doesn't have to bother with government regulations and channels of transmission. She gets to decide what classified material is really sensitive and not.
She gets to ignore the laws she wants others to follow http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/06/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-state-department-ambassador/ .
Other people in the State Department were punished for what Madame Secretary did, but of course, never mind what that woman behind the curtain is doing.
The law on the matter is clear...except of course if you are Hillary Clinton or one of her pathetic supporters trying to convince everyone not to believe their own lying eyes and the clear letter of the law.

 

No, not all the emails have been released. Far from it. And saying, "She hired someone to set up her server" is not (NOT) verification that her private email server was properly installed in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF). Hint: if the server, over which classified information was send, received, and/or re-transmitted wasn't properly installed in a SCIF, then that ALONE is a crime against national security and for that ALONE she should be indicted and prosecuted. But she won't be... like I said, the "fix is in", not because Obama has any great love for the Clinton Machine, per se, but because she is the only one who will carry on his wonderous socialist-lite, America-hating "legacy", so that we can continue to be contaminated with it for years to come....

 

She had a secure FAX (cable) for classified information to be transmitted to her instead of through email. You'll probably remember that she asked an aide having trouble getting a secure FAX to work to strip secure info and then to send insecure by email. The information wasn't ever sent by email though. Another time the secure FAX was mentioned was when Julian Assange released secure State Department cables in Wikileaks.

 

Hillary's server was NOT a proper place of custody, and it was delivered to a Colorado IT company with NO security clearances for the classified information it contained, who backed it up over the internet to a Connecticut IT company also with NO security clearances for the classified information it contained. Those are the facts, no malicious intent required.

 

It wasn't meant for classified information. And they were allowed to have external servers, and they were allowed to delete emails they thought were personal. She didn't do anything illegal. The entire case will revolve around whether or not there is reasonable doubt that the emails they marked as classified should have been known to be classified. Hillary says they aren't classified and shouldn't be classified. Tough case for Repubs. They're going to lose this just like all their other made up scandals.

 

As I said on the other thread she CREATED 104 Classified eMails and sent them herself. So is is she had no clue what was classified and what wasn't OR she just flaunted the law and didn't care? Either way she had no business being the Secretary of State let alone the President.

 

As I said in the other thread, lol... she says that she didn't think they were classified at the time and they shouldn't be classified now. And she didn't send 104 classified emails. Lot of those classifications are snippets within an email, subject line, or name. For over 50,000 pages of documents, 104 classified snippets in emails that she doesn't believe should be classified... yea. You're not going to win this one. She'll be fine.

 

Clinton, on her private server, wrote 104 emails the government says are classified

Read it for yourself.

 

As I said in the other thread, lol... she says that she didn't think they were classified at the time and they shouldn't be classified now. And she didn't send 104 classified emails. Lot of those classifications are snippets within an email, subject line, or name. For over 50,000 pages of documents, 104 classified snippets in emails that she doesn't believe should be classified... yea. You're not going to win this one. She'll be fine.

 

One or two emails in dispute is reasonable...but 104???? It should be obvious to all by now Clinton had no clue what should be classified or not. She simply isn't qualified to be President.

 

Lol, 50,000+ pages there were 104 incidences of what they viewed as classified information currently. .2% of the documents. It should be obvious to all now that Clinton was not using this to knowingly exchange classified information. She'll be fine and you'll be wrong again. You should be use to it by now.

 

So that's the plan? Liberals will not deny a crime was committed, but will try to sell the lack of intent absolves their proclaimed queen. It might work on television, but not in a court room...

 

It almost never happens, all depending on ones position. While it is true that the average person would take a career hit, unless it is something drastic, they most likely won't go to jail for non malicious intent. But it is not applied evenly.

 

There wasn't a crime committed. That's why we deny it.

 

Of course there was, the FBI would not have spent the resources they have if there wasn't, the only thing left is who is going to take the fall for Hillary's idiocy and criminal acts. We know it won't be that stooge that got immunity, so maybe Huma or that other moron will fall on their swords, or maybe, just maybe Hillary will actually be held to account for her crimes...

 

Sure they would. They are investigating if any classified information was jeopardized and if she intentionally sent or received classified information. If there wasn't, nothing will happen. Just because there is an investigation does not mean a crime was committed. She'll be fine and you guys will be wrong again.

 

We already know that classified information was found on her private server, regardless of when it was classified, therefore crimes have been committed, its possible that if the White House knew she was using a private server they were co-conspirators or criminal accomplices to Hillary's crimes. If there were no crimes whatsoever they'd have assigned a 30 year evidence clerk to look into it, that's not the case. Perhaps you're implying the Obama DOJ is actually so incompetent they are spending thousands of man hours on 'nothing', although it is likely most of would believe that level of incompetence from Obama...

 

In the real world, they will only call it a crime if there was intent or gross negligence. Otherwise, having couple snippets of classified material in 50k+ documents is not a crime. She'll be fine. Your armchair lawyer skills will once again prove to be out of touch with reality.

 

Not for classified information, intent is irrelevant. Volume is also irrelevant, she could have a million documents but if even just one is classified and accessed by unauthorized persons its a crime. Your willingness to forgive her is all sorts of touchy feely, but has no relevance to the legal system that premised on facts and evidence, not liberal tears. I'm under no illusions, this corrupt administration will likely allow whatever Hillary's crimes are to be ignored, and if she's elected the corruption will continue and spread, its one of the only things that liberals truly excel at...

 

Intent is 100% relevant. Volume will also be relevant. You're out of touch with reality. And you're already making excuses for her being not guilty of crime, when in reality she will be not guilty because she didn't actually commit any crimes. But then again, I'm talking about the real world. I know that doesn't coincide with the Internet conservative world.

 

No, intent is not relevant in matters of classified information, nor is volume, as it only takes one instance of classified information being put in the wrong hands to cause serious damage.

 

In your conservative world it's not. In the real world it is. Intent and distribution of information will be most relevant in determining the outcome of this case. And based on everything said so far, none of that is very convincing. Hillary will be fine and be the next POTUS. Sorry about your luck, but good news is you can make up tons of scandals the next 8 years!