Search in George Zimmerman case turns up weapons, ammunition

Do they also walk up to strangers at night, cold c*ock them, ride them to the ground and then proceed to try and beat them to death . . . as was established in the Zimmerman trial?

 

No.. We usually speak to them and say Good Evening or Good morning.. The neighbors don't follow them..

We have security.. and they are uniformed and not menacing.. They also speak.

 

That was not the weight disparity between the pair on the night of the killing. You really should know that since you are purporting to be an expert on the case. From Wikipedia:

 

So I guess this 72 year old woman was "following, menacing, verbally deficient" and overall posed a threat ............

 

It's so nice to be wealthy enough to afford perfect safety and comfort. It's a pity that reality is not the same for all citizens. Perhaps your wealth needs to be redistributed to redress this wrong, yes?

 

The knock out game has not come to Atlanta yet and I doubt it there is potential for it in a gated community where the gates are not broken or left open until 7 PM.

Why do you think Trayvon was playing the knock out game?

 

What does wealth redistribution have to do with it?

With even a little self control and common sense this shooting could have been avoided although I am sure George doesn't know that.. When you throw your GF out of her house and barricade the door... you are pretty much over the edge.

 

Do you think you may have a short attention span that doesn't allow you to read more than one sentence at a time, or does that apply ONLY when the SECOND SENTENCE DOESN"T MEET YOUR AGENDA?

From the link YOU provided:

Funny how someone is able to lose 15 lbs in 6 weeks. . .when it is NECESSARY to show that they can't POSSIBLY have been big enough to resist a punch on the nose by a 158 lb unarmed teenager!

I guess, for some, accuracy is not that important!

 

So you are saying what? The police department faked some records? Do you have a reason why they would do such a thing?

 

Is your comment purposely trying to make you look dense? Or is it just a testimony to hypocrisy?

George had 6 weeks to lose the weight. . .it is obvious that he is using his weight as a means to present himself in one way or another. . and that he has ALWAYS had an issue with his weight (have you seen the pictures of his booking for assault in 2005?).

His weight fluctuates like a yoyo. . . and he is USING this. . .just as it was obviously very helpful to present himself as a bloated, fat, slow moving clump of fat during trial! How could such a whale even resist being pushed. . .and when pushed, how could he have gotten up? Right?
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. . .maybe you really didn't notice his fluctuations in weight. . .not from 2005 to February 2012, not from February 2012 to April 2012, not from April 2012 to June 2013, and not even from June 2013 to September 2013!

But now that it has been brought to your attention. . .why don't you check it out?

 

George weighed 204 the night that he shot Trayvon..

He weighed 185 when he was arrested 44 days later.

 

The "assault" game is alive and well all across America. You were the one who decided that certain criteria mattered, which I quoted, although you can imagine that I find it repugnant every time liberals raise such as somehow inviting, if not validating, an assault.

Just wondering where you draw the line on assaults that are somehow "righteous", and those that aren't, and how it matters here ?

The convoluted logic of liberals has always fascinated me, so please do enlighten us all !!

 

Excuse me?? I am not a liberal.. Never have been.

The knock out game seems to have started in Philadelphia over a year ago.

Where is your evidence that Trayvon was playing the knock out game rather than walking home from the store?

George

 

I never said "knockout" game. I said assault. Now, can you explain how an assault is somehow justified based upon how much folks talk ?

As for ducks. If it looks like, walks like, and talks like ........................ its a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing duck.

 

You mean that you think Trayvon was NOT walking home from the store and set out to assault George?

 

WTF are you talking about ? The Zimmerman case has already been adjudicated. Was televised live, and reported everywhere. Did you miss it ?

I asked you for the duck viewpoint of when "not talking a whole lot" validates an assault ? Or if you thought the old-lady might have been following her attacker, and therefore deserved to be assaulted ? I used the criteria that you introduced to the thread. I expect more than a "quack" in response.

But it looks like duck (*)(*)(*)(*) is what I'm gonna get !!

Thanks.

 

I was speaking about the Martin incident.. You would know this if you could follow a thread. Christ Sadine give it up!

- - - Updated - - -

They are called by many Obamaphones. If you want to refer to them as Reagan phones have at it. I really dont care Landru... Err whatever your screen name is now.

 

George had an Iphone and a Smartphone.

 

People who have had a bounty put on them, who have had their lives threatened and are being falsely accused of committing murder by the obsessive.

Isn't obsession a mental problem?

 

It seems to me that more innocent whites are being killed by black gang bangers than no limit "ni@@a's" are being lost to whites or white Hispanics.

So far at least 7 people killed by black youts playing the knockout game and only dear sweet little Treyvon out of the action for their side.

 

The problem is that "right by" is suggestive. In Texas, for instance, "around the block" is anything within a 3 hour drive. "Right by" my house may be a block away, not several centimeters or inches. And in other places, "right by" would have a different connotation of the specific distance.

This is why people who make the same fallacy taht TM must have "doubled back" or came from his house, or implying that "right by" is just inches away where no one made an exact or an educated guess of how far or how close TM was from his place of residence.

 

So George gets to kill an unarmed teen?? Is that your rationale?

 

And all this time I thought the topic of this thread was the LATEST of Zimmerman's aggressive antics!

Aren't you slightly off topic then?

 

Easy does it there Mac...don't let that hatred get the better of you.

 

Yep. . .what is your excuse for being so obsess about defending the killer of a teenager and the aggressor of women?