Senate getting involved in revisiting 9/11

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Nov 22, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Threats do not bother me. I am a little guy. If you guys kill me the truth will still be told. I am old enough to have enjoyed my life. Kill away.

    - - - Updated - - -

    You must be the girly girl of the group. Don't get me wrong girls. I like girls. What I am skeptical of is girly girl men.
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Get off the cross. Martyrs are boring.
     
  3. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Says the girly girl man...
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    More insults, what a surprise. Typical 'truther'.
     
  5. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Insult? I thought you would be proud to be the girly girl of the shills. My bad.
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What are you on about? Can't back up your claims so you start projecting your insecurities?

    Knock it off.
     
  7. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The laws of physics don't apply to the "official" BS story, do they? Notice how you dodge the point raised, and resort to nonsensical insults. You HOPE the truth movement is dead. IT ISN'T.
     
  8. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The answer I was given, is that I have to report them every single time. Again, certain players are seemingly granted certain privilege.
     
  9. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    It wouldn't matter if you did post it. The specialists would do their best to bury it, through their normal routine.

    - - - Updated - - -

    They'd rather you post it, so they can pick it apart, in some fashion.
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    From page 45 of the NIST report on WTC 7:

    Further, they state in greater detail:

    Therefore, according to the source you provided, the north face of the roofline of WTC 7 only reached gravitational acceleration for 2.25 seconds, and was due to the buckled columns from earlier in the collapse.
     
  11. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NIST proved that WTC Building 7 was brought down with controlled demolition.
    This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories or 32.0 m (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s.

    The only possible way for a building to go into freefall is every single vertical column has to give way at precisely the same time. Fire can not do that. It is impossible. Only controlled demolition can accomplish that task. A new investigation with subpoena power into 9/11 is in order. Peter Jennings had foreknowledge of the events of 9/11.

    [video=youtube;ERhoNYj9_fg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ERhoNYj9_fg#![/video]
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are cherry picking from the report to try and make your point. That's not honest debate.

    NIST does not say the entire building achieved free fall, just the roof line of the north face. Thus your theorem of all the columns failing at once is unfounded. Read the entire page.
     
  13. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Only one part of WTC7 collapsed at free fall. As I have pointed out in other threads, this could very likely be due to the fact that the internal collapse, which had been well under way, pulled the facade down with it, accelerating it faster than normal.
     
  14. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The entire building went into freefall for 8 stories according to NIST. What building or demolition experience do you have?

    [video=youtube;ERhoNYj9_fg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ERhoNYj9_fg#![/video]

    That video proves building 7 controlled demolition and obfuscation by NIST along with prior knowledge by Brian Williams.
     
  15. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Wrong.

    None, you?
     
  16. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NIST agreed the entire building went into freefall for 8 stories. It is in the NIST report.

    20 years as a building contractor. The fire codes are the most strict of the building codes because firemen sometimes have to go into burning buildings to rescue people. Architects, engineers, and contractors are not allowed, and do not want, to build structures that collapse from fire.
     
  17. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There will be no more govt. investigations into 9-11.

    we know what happened.
     
  18. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You'd think 20 years as a building contractor and you would actually be able to read a building performance report...
     
  19. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    One thing is for certain. I would not trust the government to do another investigation. Government investigating itself has proven to be a failure. The truth will be told in the court of public opinion. Truthers are changing minds all across the country.
     
  20. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you guys lost the war years ago.

    its over.
     
  21. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I live in NYC.

    I used to see the crowds of Truthers at the WTC on 9-11.

    those days are long over.

    The Truth Movement is dead.

    It lives only in the minds of CTists on internet forums like this one.
     
  22. jafc

    jafc Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ok another question for you, what happens if you get your new investigation and the results are exactly the same as we have now?
     
  23. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    he believes any investigation, or study, or analysis that doesn't confirm his pre-conceived notions of truth, is a farse by the New World Order.
     
  24. jafc

    jafc Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Probably, But all I'm asking for are answers from him I'm not asking difficult questions I just want an honest answer.
     
  25. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am not asking for a new government investigation. If you investigated yourself would you incriminate yourself?
     

Share This Page