Senate Report on Beghanzi proves multiple Fox Lies/Myths

https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

There you go. Have a good read.

 

Your desperation is duly noted...Um, just so you know, that shoddy, incomplete, and inadequate report is the very reason as to why the majority of the people demanded the House investigations that are still underway.

 

The House Report you rely on is "shoddy, incomplete, and inadequate". Got it.

 

Yes, your standard of unsupported, baised, opinionated blather. Thanks for proving it again.

Yes.

I didn't wonder anything of the sort.

You mean this one? https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

Why do you claim they are *my* opinions? They are the findings of the bi-partisan Senate Intelligence Committee.

Don't worry, I wouldn't never mistake you for someone who does anything seriously.

 

Um, their is no "House Select Committee Report", yet. Once again demonstrating your membership in the low information useful idiot crowd.

 

Investigative Report on the Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Facilities in Benghazi, Libya, September 11-12, 2012
U.S. House of Representatives
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
November 21, 2014.

https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

Looks like a report to me. Others can decide for themsleves.

 

Well, you can thank the Republicans for making such a shoddy incomplete and inadequate report then.

 

If any of your post were true, my standards tower above standardless tripe you are told to believe.

I knew that thinking was not in your wheelhouse, but thanks for clearing up that wondering isn't either.

You mean this one? https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf[/QUOTE]Yes, the the report that only addressed the intelligence role and omitted the the lies and deceit from this administration that led to this: http://benghazi.house.gov/ The select committee that is addressing all the

Did I claim they were yours? Sorry, my bad. I know nothing you'd post would actually be "yours".

You do realize that you posted the House Intellignce report and postee the Senate report don't you? No matter, the only report that will have the answers to the questions wlill come from this: http://benghazi.house.gov/on

Don't worry, I wouldn't never mistake you for someone who does anything seriously.[/QUOTE]You wouldn't never mistake? So much for you and being mistaken? You're allowed your projections.

 

Unlike you, I supported my statements with links to sources. See: http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=339618&p=1063516953#post1063516953

Where did I say I don't wonder? I see that mischaracterizing my responses isn't beneath you. What a surprise.

That was the House report.

Why would you say that?

Of course I realize it. Why would you think I wouldn't I?

 

Yes it looks like a report to you. That is all that is necessary to one who is part of the low information crowd. The problem is, as usual, its not the final report called out for in HR 567. I know, you can't help but confuse the intelligence report with the current investigations from the House Select Committee on Benghazi from which hearings are still being held and from which the final report will be made

They have, I've already proven that to you.

 

Whoop de doo. So you're criticizing the bi-partisan Senate Intel report based on a House Report that doesn't exist.

Who nominated you to speak for everyone else?

 

No need to keep proving your ignorance. I accepted it on your first post.

 

No. Once again, you are unable to understand. The Senate report deserved its criticism all on its own-- not because of a House report. The House report will amend the inadequacies of all previous less accurate reports., but then, to you folks on the left, that is not important.

Again, ignoring the facts that where laid out previous? Feel free to check out the CNN poll I quoted earlier if you still have problems.

 

Thanks for sharing your opinions. I'll take the findings of the bi-partisan Senate Intel Committee after a thorough year long investigation over your usupported, biased say so. Others can decide for themselves.

A CNN poll nominate you to speak for everyone else?

 

Yeah, its just my opinion that the House Select Committee is still investigating Behghazi, and its just my opinion that HR 567 calls for a final report that has yet to be written. Still can't face facts, eh?
Again, it's no wonder you are part of the low information crowd.

Of course you will. A good useful idiot will always take what they are told to take.

You say that as if you would be included in that crowd...

I see you have an obsession with building strawmen...

 

Im sure there are many liberals on this thread that are as confused as hell about this..Seeing as how thier left wing media outlets never uttered 1 word about Benghazi..or what happened

 

Are you kidding? Fox's bull(*)(*)(*)(*) "stand down" story saturated the media for months before their lie was exposed.

It never ceases to amaze me how effective RW propaganda is.

 

Are you kidding? Reporting the testimony of those who were there, on the ground, under fire and in charge at the embassy at the time is called journalism. It never ceases to amaze me as to how the left is always amazed when confronted with the truth and exposed to real journalism. It's not called the "right" for nothing.

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=339618&p=1063516953#post1063516953

 

One-trick pony.....

A known and proven flawed report does little to bolster your propaganda and wish for this to all go away. The final report and the final word has yet to be written since it is still in the investigation stages...

http://benghazi.house.gov/