Serious 'Stormfront' Question >>>MOD WARNING>>>

I scored 100% on a civil service job test and was beat for the job by a minority applicant with an 84% score because he scored 115% with his extra minority points. What do you call that?

 

You may have missed your calling; the private sector even has paid multimillion dollar bonuses to individuals who were nowhere near the poverty thresholds and could afford to pay entire departments to help them conform to rational choice theory or fill out corporate welfare forms in triplicate.

 

Absolutely correct.

the very reason for religion has been to that ends, to get people to even pay attention to these things we are talking about.

But a righteous man receives a righteous reward, and a prophet receives a prophet's reward.
So either way, together people can re-establish marriage as the place for sexual relationships and stop the Child Abuse.

 

Who let you see all the test scores?

 

Its about crime.
Its about Violent Crimes
.

Fact:
70% of ALL violent crime is by people who were raised by Single Mothers or have Stepfathers.

Even middle class Blacks want to get out the cities the Black Community has 70% of their people on Welfare, all jammed together, going to the same schools, and living in poor neighborhoods because they all want to be together.

 

Neither.

It is nothing more than a few fringe people who have gotten some attention.

Many other equally wierd fringe groups exists it is merely this one popping up on the MSM radar.

 

Deep commitment and love (especially to the child), I'll buy.

But when 50% of traditional "marriages" end in divorce, what you're saying to me isn't completely sensible.

Marriage needs a lot of work in this society; right now, about half the people are putting on some 'show'.

 

Show me one white community slathered in gang graffiti. No, you aren't going to, because they don't exist. There are no sets of Bloods, Crips, or 13s in white communities. At best, you'll make a vague reference to a few trashy bikers.

Except I never said the majority of those groups were in gangs, I said the majority of gangs were among those groups. I realize that causes you discomfort, but I'm not here to coddle anyone by trying to slap equals signs where they don't belong.

I'm familiar with the straw man egalitarian liberal arguments like this used to beat on when they throw the "racist" label around, which they use to push an agenda. It's quite amazing how often liberals respond the same way when they're confronted with data they don't like. One of the first things they do is make the false assertion that the person presenting the data is claiming "all" of a group is like X or Y, which is what you just did.

Try to be more precise.

Hoodies are among various types of clothing preferred by gang members. Combining it with extremely droopy pants is another indication as well. Using those started with the gangs and spread to the general hip hop community. Suffice it to say, if you don't want to be taken for a gang banger, don't dress like them.

 

I didn't see them all, I had a close friend at the time that was a Detective that checked for me.

 

Are you trying to argue that there are no bad white communities in this country? You think a lack of what you call "gang graffiti" proves anything? And how do you know there are no gangs in what you call "white communities"?

Doesn't matter if supposedly the majority of gangs are among those "groups" as you claim, since those gangs represent a tiny minority, they are essentially irrelevant to what we were discussing. Oh, and nothing you say causes me discomfort, only amusement. Arguing with racists hell bent on pushing an agenda only provides the laughs.

So I take it you've been confronted about your racism before? Good.

Well, thanks for your expertise on the subject we both know you know nothing about. Your laughable perceptions and generalizations are duly noted though.

 

Read my posts and get back to me. You're repeatedly constructing straw men and shoving them into my mouth. You claim white communities have the big gang problems black and Latino ones do. It's on you to show this. Good luck with that.

Some 80% of gangbangers are black or Latino according to US govt data: http://www.nationalgangcenter.gov/survey-analysis/demographics

That means by default that if you settle anywhere numbers of blacks or Latinos live, your chances of encountering gang activity skyrocket.

Of course it's relevant, because it's an extra verification, along with crime data in general, that more mayhem occurs when one has more non-white neighbors. Statistically this is an unavoidable fact.

There are 150,000 gangbangers in LA County alone, most of them Latino. Orange County had 17,000 gangbangers, of which 85% were Latino at least as recently as 1994.

http://www.laalmanac.com/crime/cr03v.htm

Many liberals cry that uncomfortable fact is racist. I don't care. Call it "hate facts" if you'd like. The word "racist" in the dictionary doesn't say "that which a person subjectively finds offensive."

Because if you saw a bald white dude covered in tattoos, you wouldn't suspect anything untoward.

 

Actually, I never said that. Looks to me like you are putting words in my mouth.

And since gangs are a small minority among all "groups" of people in this country, it is in fact irrelevant, as they do not represent most black and "latino" people.

Again, since gangs represent a small minority among ANY "group" of people in this country, we can safely conclude that gangs do not represent most black and "latino" people in this country. Thus making the discussion of gangs irrelevant.

Most conservatives cry when they are rightfully called a racist. Conservatives spout off a lot of racist drivel daily about those pesky blacks and "Hispanics". Don't want to be labeled a racist? Stop saying racist things.

Depends on the tattoos. Can't assume he's a criminal because of a bald head and tattoos though.

 

Who cares what a racist hate site says? No one serious looks at such drivel.

 

"Racist hate" being facts you are unable to refute so try to dismiss with name calling and ad hominem.

 

Yes, let's "move on". White people "moved on" from Constantinople also. How progressive. Keep "moving on" from existing White people. You don't want a bunch of Turks and Semites to call you names or write lies about you in newspapers.

 

You're acting as if white areas have the gang problems non-white ones do, and I just proved you wrong. Sorry.

Gangs represent a small percentage of non-white crime rates, which top whites in all categories. These brushoffs of federal data by repeating "small" isn't going to cut it. Let's reiterate: Non-white areas have much higher rates of crime and gang membership than white ones do.

Now that you can no longer deny that non-whites are a HUGE percent of American gangs, you've taken the "but it's a small number" backpedal. Thank you for admitting they're most of the gang problem, albeit indirectly. You wanted proof that whites are a small percentage of street gangs, and you got it. Yes, that's why white communities aren't coated in graffiti by the Crips, Bloods, and 13s. Amazing I had to actually walk you through this.

Prove I'm saying racist things. Hurting your feelings and saying things that politically anger you isn't the definition of racist. Facts aren't racist - EVER. Even uncomfortable ones that rip the equals signs down off your walls.

The fact is that non-whites commit a large percentage of crime and that they are a large percentage of gang members, thus it's reasonable to conclude that communities in which they settle have increased problems in both. Hate fact?

Nobody is "assuming" the person is a criminal, but you can't deny that people would think it far likelier of the type of dress, and that's the point. Whites are no more exempt from that than any other group.

 

Sad to see someone that sees everyone they met, read about, or watch on the tube in terms of the color of their skin and be so proud of their ignorance that they simple have to share it with the world so all can see and bask in your "brilliance".

 

Non sequitur, ad hominem abusive, appeal to pity.

 

Truth, and I have No Pity.

 

Assertion of righteousness doesn't cover your use of logical fallacy. That would be called a circular reasoning fallacy.

 

Nope, I leave the circular game to those without a logical arguement to present, they are so good at it. I never claimed righteousness, but thanks for the compliment, I will not let it go to my head, woops, too late.

 

You're committing these fallacies on this thread while denying them, and you don't even seem to realize it.

Amusing and unsurprising at the same time.

 

You are seeing things.

 

Maybe things are seeing you.

Ever consider that?

There's an old saying in my neck of the woods. Those who study things are studied BY things.

 

If there is one talent I have it is being in the woods, spent and still spend a lot of time there and I live right next to miles and miles of it, it is a more natural place for a person to be and is good for the soul. As for things watching me there, that knife cuts two ways, more than one has found out where I was when I tapped them on the shoulder from behind and said "Hello". Never assume, it could cost you everything.