Serious 'Stormfront' Question >>>MOD WARNING>>>

Absolutely true....or they'd be able to present their message in the light of day, in front of God and everyone.

What I want to know more about is the connection between "white nationalists", Stormfront, and the KKK.

It's not in dispute that Stormfront is a rebranding effort for the KKK, primarilly because it's founder is former Alabama Klan boss and long-time white supremacist Don Black. I haver also heard that Stormfront is quite popular with white nationalists and other racial extremists.

So what do you "white nationalists: think of Stormfront and the KKK?...I'd rather hear it from you.

My guess is that I won't get any comments, because Stormfront frowns on scrutiny and confrontation these days.

 

Can you list some of those arguments?

 

Well "superior" is subjective and has several defintions. That's why you are confused. Whites are superior at building advanced ordered civilisations. They are inferior at filling newspapers with lies, defrauding money, and heartlessly killing people of other races, like Semites. So maybe the Semite way is "superior" from the point of view of evolution. The White way is "superior" in my mind. It's subjective you see.

 

It's not subjective at all in this context. If your "superior" race is heavily dependent on other races for it's survival, it is not superior. If it is that fragile, you cannot say, objectively, that it is superior.

Which is why Egypt and China were populated by white people. Ok.

Europe has the most white people, but does not have the best technology. Neither commercial nor military. They use American computers and software. If the white way was superior, Europe should be far ahead of us by now. They had a head start of centuries.

If it cannot survive on it's own, it is not superior. Nature does not recognize excuses.

If they are really that easily misled, if they are really that weak-willed, I don't see how you can consider them superior. "Superior" implies they can compete, and that is clearly not the case. White racist ideology has failed everywhere it has been attempted.

 

So you believe that someone being anti-racist means they are anti-white. My my, you guys are so predictable, you simply cannot avoid showing your inner selves.

 

From the "stuff" I have seen you post here I do not see anything of a superior nature to them, hmmm I must be missing something, oh yes we should accept that you are superior to others because your Say you are but we are not to judge your superiority based on your actions or words, yeah got it.

 

To them being anti white means you don't support living in a white nationalist hell hole where either the minorities are all thrown out the country, or they are subjected.

 

Because they know they are being monitored and rightly so.

 

No it means you support massive genocide level immigration and cover up minority crime.

- - - Updated - - -

Well that's just a lame ad hominem which addresses nothing.

 

There seems to be a world wide trend of competing for victim status.. Christians do it, Muslims do it, Jews do it.. Blacks and whites do it.. IMO its pretty cheesy all around.

 

I would still like an answer more defintive than Madison's, Repubilcan Doctrine, as to why racism is of any subjective moral value to the sole surviving species in the Homo genus.

 

What I find amazing is folks like you who have a fear of someone black committing a crime against you, but in reality it is going to be someone white who commits a crime against you and you are ok with that.

 

No most crimes and attempted crimes against me have been been committed by non-Whites.

But then me personally is irrelevant to the statistical and media point.

 

So, is it due to racism or perveieved inequality?

 

With the exception of non-violent crimes, all statistics (including those of the FBI), and all evidence shows that 93% of violent crimes against white people are committed by black people. In fact, it so commonplace that white people are becoming apathetic, regard it as the "new normal" and expect a "black attack" of some kind during their ordinary activities of each day.

It has become so common and ordinary that whites consider them to be and integral part of common hazards to deal with, such as car crashes, storms, lightning strikes, disease, illness, accidents and other routine hazards which are encountered and experienced as a part of everyday life.

Does Obamacare cover black attacks against whites? No!

 

Would we have this same problem if even the (religious) right could muster enough moral of "goodwill toward men" to have Faith in the execution of a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will, and unemployment compensation.

 

I don't understand the question. Can you expand on that?

 

Sure it has, the DOJ shows that most crimes committed against whites are committed against other whites. I guess you are the exception to the rule.

 

Well, obviously. Non White savage tribespeople would still be violent towards Whites if you changed some random labour law. It seems totally irrelevant.

- - - Updated - - -

Is that because Whites tend to live near to other Whites genius? I even doubt it's true.

 

no. if you don't have that clue or that cause; it really just makes me think racism is for the clueless and Causeless.

- - - Updated - - -

The Romans didn't seem to have the problem of racism.

 

Duh, I guess that throws your asinine theory out the window. I am pretty sure you doubt it, because your whole premise is to try and make a case that black folks commit all the crime in this country.

 

Does the inequality of unequal wealth play any role and does it correlate to current statistics.

 

Probably true regarding non-violent crimes such as so-called "white-collar" crimes like embezzlement, slander, scams, etc., as well as purely putrid, cowardly and family crimes like child abuse, wife beating, drug addiction and so forth. As a matter of fact, virtually all white men in prison are there not because of "macho" type crimes that require cojones, risk and courage to commit such as home invasions, bank robbery, muggings, burglary and the like. They are in prison for committing like the aforementioned "cowardly" crimes against one another.

When white men attempt to commit a daring crime against the public, they usually bungle it because it's not their forté. Recently an awkward and clumsy white guy held up a local bank. On the way out, a customer confronted him. (Had the white robber been black, he would have put some authority into the robbery and shot the customer.) The bubba and robber- wannabe became rattled and spilled cash all over the parking lot as he fled to his pickup truck. Cops nabbed him 15 minutes later and he was crying like a baby.

 

Oh those are the good crimes that white folks commit. Here is a newsflash for you, you can add in murder, rape, etc.

Well here is another fact for you Mr. Whites commit coward crimes. The majority of black folks in prison are there for non-violent drug related crimes.

Keep telling yourself that foolish lie, maybe one day you might believe it because nobody else is buying that bs.

Ahhhhhh. Well here in Georgia there is a white bank robber who robbed over 10 banks before he was finally caught. I guess he was just lucky.

 

inject::::: nope. politicians, cops and lawyers are the biggest batch of criminals, regardless of color