Shills??? MOD ALERT

Hey, guy, I don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*). Got it? Plus, this is a blatant tactic you state is evidence of a shill. You are attacking my person and my posting history instead of the content of my posts. You're purely trying to "muddy the waters" of who I am in order to try and make the facts I post less credible.

Have whatever poll you want, as childish as that is, LoL.

What is that tactic called? "Everyone agrees with me therefore you are a shill."

I wish I could tell you what I do for a living, unfortunately my contract states I can't bring my position up publically. And frankly, my job means more to me than showing you how ridiculous your theories are. Thinking I work for the government is laughable.

Let me know how the poll goes, I bet you've held a few before.

 

And if I was in 1940 Germany the probability of Nazi's being a threat is much higher wouldn't you say?

Well go to the Yahoo message boards and if shills are Nazi's, and Yahoo is a place and time, if you think it resembles current day Germany or 1940's Germany?

And I train the UFC and bench the 275.

Golden rule buddy.

Interesting, as I think people can see for themselves my willingness to engage.

- - - Updated - - -

Gotten to!

 

I love how people claim these discussions have no value, and yet continue to show up everyday to post.

If you don't think this accomplishes something, then why do you come here to post?

 

It's obvious that spewing your venom hasn't converted a single individual, so the question is equally posed to you. Why do you come here to post if it doesn't convert anyone or get anyone to change their beliefs?

 

Is it obvious?

I have seen the opinions and questions change of certain posters, and I promise for every active poster's opinion I am effecting, there are 10-20 lurkers who who are effected as well.

Want to answer the question, or are you just going to go all matrix, and start dodging bullets?

 

Our reasons are close to the same. Question answered.

I come here because I feel the information being put out by truthers is wrong, and it doesn't depict the true story. Either truthers cherry pick, or all out lie. I feel that since I have a substantial knowledge base, and ability to locate factual information, that I should use those abilities to show anyone listening that truther are frauds. And they are, truthers are frauds, charlatans, false prophets. Richard Gage is a liar, p4t are liars, killtown are liars, anti jew websites are liars, and truthers are just the parrots.

 

So then these forums do serve a purpose, and therefor there would be a motive to effect that purpose correct?

 

Yes, and no. Yes, these forums serve a purpose on the grounds that people get to come here and communicate. However, as stated before by cooky, they don't serve any government purpose. None of you truthers are on the verge of "spilling the goods" about 9/11. Hell, you're not even on the verge of making most people care. You aren't a threat to any government entity so there is no reason for any government program to pay a group of people, nonetheless the amount we have here, to come and prove you guys wrong.

Truthers are SELF DEBUNKING. Look at your little rant. Hannibal has used minimal effort to show you that, by your own tactics, you're a shill. There's no need for a government group to get involved. You have visions of grandeur. I'm sorry, but you aren't worth it to the government. It would just be a waste of resources.

 

Yes, and no..........

Gotten to!

 

Cherry pick, and dodge noted. Thank you for proving my point.

 

Yes, I dodged all your claims to grandure, that give you the magical ability to determine what has value and what doesn't, as you continuously attempt to label me with the truther, CT, tin-foiler label.

As I have stated before. The op asked for evidence of shills, and I offer this thread as such!

 

I come here because I enjoy it. I can regularly find threads on this forum that pertain to subjects I am passionate about which allows me to debate people who have different viewpoints than myself. Yeah, I may be a bit arrogant but i like to think i take people who disagree with me here to school . I used to think you could inform and sway other peoples opinions but after some time here i dont think most people are objective and or open minded enough to really have a change of heart on a given subject. Look at the posters on 9 11, despite all the posts and info presented few here have substantially different views than they began with. For me its all fin anc games here.

 

Yes, I agree. Using your own criteria you have proven beyond a reasonable doubt who the shills are on this board. Thank you for your service.

The cherry pick I was referring too was that these boards have uses but not the one you were under the impression of, and people can have whatever perception of you they'd like. However, I don't believe you are proving the point you set out to prove.

 

Notice how I have no problem with this. Apparently I proved to you shills do exist.

- - - Updated - - -

So you believe that you can effect other peoples opinions with information on these debate boards, and yet question what motives any form of centralized power would have to manipulate this arena?

 

I did not say that I thought I could effect other peoples opinions. I believe I have also addressed why I think a centralized power would not be interested in 'manipulating this arena'.

 

See this is the type of thing I am talking about. I can show you a post of yours from just a few pages ago, where you seemed to be more then willing to engage in real debate.

Then I pin you into a corner, and rather then concede the point, you cling to your stance like you have another agenda.

 

I can understand you wanting to protect your source of income, but I don't recall you ever revealing your name here, so how would your employer know that you broke your contract and revealed your employment online since you're posting anonymously?

Besides, I've never really heard of tight-lipped secrecy civilian sector jobs like that, I mean, outside of the expected few. Are you working inside one of the expected few?

And you have to know that what you said above is suspicious as all hell.

 

Only to the paranoid.

 

Perhaps we are having a failure to communicate. In my mind, my admission that i come here to engage in debate does not denote my belief that i effect other peoples viewpoints. In the post of mine that you bolded i explicitly state that i once believed my message might effects others but i no longer believe that. You excluded that statement from the quote you replied to. Additionally, the colloquial expression 'take to school' denoted my belief that I better those that I engage in debate. I didnt concede your point because I dont brlieve nor did I intend for the statements 'take to school' or 'rngage in debate' to mean that i actually believed wordd held sway- as i explicitly stated in that part of the post which you ommitted

 

Explain your personal attack, please.

 

What personal attack?

 

Quit playing games. Explain your position. Why is it 'paranoid' for me to say that it is suspicious for what plague said?

 

Did I say you were paranoid? No, I didn't. I said that only paranoid people would find what he said suspicious. Let me be more specific: Only paranoid idiots who can't function in the real world would find his post suspicious.

 

Personal attack #2.

Obviously I find what he said to be suspicious. You know that, hence your first paranoid comment. Whatever.

I just want an explanation as to why you think it's paranoid of me to find his post suspicious.

It's simple, man.

 

You can try to twist my words if you wish. I wasn't talking about you, so it wasn't a personal attack. If what I posted makes you feel guilt or shame, perhaps you should examine your motives and agenda.
Until then, try not to take everything so personally.