Simple request for Flight 93

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Feb 14, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,870
    Likes Received:
    3,841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What does Hannibal have to do with the recovery efforts? Have you spoken with the people on the scene yet?

    Your entire argument seems to hinge on the exact percentage of the recovery, and its exact location. Am I wrong in this? As much as you want to characterize it as "whining" its simply an attempt to point out that your semantic game is based on a false premise.

    Most != much.

    If much of the contents of an M&M bag are brown M&Ms, that still does not mean there are more brown M&Ms then there are green, red, yellow, and blue M&Ms combined. If most of the contents of an M&M bag are brown, then it certainly does mean that there are more brown then all others combined.

    If I say much of the plane was found in the soft dirt, that does not mean most of the plane, or even a majority of the plane were found in the soft dirt. In fact, the site lists off the various other places the debris was located 1. strewn everywhere like garbage, 2. in the woods, 3. in a nearby pond.

    At any rate I still fail to see how the exact percentage of the plane found below the Earth is some sort of gotcha that supports the argument that no plane at all crashed there.
     
  2. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You didn't see where he claimed to have contacted them during the excavation and he says they confirmed to him that "most" of the plane did indeed bury? Do you really need me to post the link to that again?

    Btw, you keep avoiding my question, do you think Hannibal is lying about any of that? You can say "yes" if you think he's lying about that. I think he is.

    No, have you?

    Yep, you're wrong and I "seem" to have found your problem. Our argument has NEVER hinged on the "exact" percentage. We've always said the general term "most" which you skeptic have been fighting that term tooth & nail ever since. I don't blame you though, I'd hate to be a defender of the official story and have to try to prove that most of a 757 buried. LOL

    As of the "exact location" where most of the debris was, they said it was "underground." Usually people complain about a conspiracy theory where the CT details are vague. LOL

    There's no false premise (Hannibal claims to have even confirmed they said "most" of Flight 93 buried) and the only people playing semantic games have been you skeptics.

    What was that about "semantic games" again?

    So are you saying "much" can never, ever, ever mean "most" in any situation?

    Also, has it ever occurred to you that the FBI didn't choose the best word to technically describe their story about how much of Flight 93 "buried in the ground"?

    It's clear why you don't understand it, you keep getting it wrong. We've never based our argument on an exact percentage and have only said our argument supports that official lied about the plane burying.

    Hope that clears up all the confusion for you.
     
  3. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Of course not. I know that. You know that. I am not surprised you would try to play dumb like that, but even killtown in all his ignorance isn't THAT stupid!

    And yet you don't believe them. Hmmmm. What was your pathetic excuse again? Oh yeah. If Wally Miller, who's job it was to gather remains including those in the hole, had been in the hole, reporters would have reported it because they were hanging on Wally's every move. :lol: I don't think I will ever get tired of rubbing that pathetic lameassed excuse in your face.

    So that is your lame explanation how much always means most? Well, it is on par with the rest of your lameassed excuses, so I'm not surprised.

    Yes because everyone knows one should leave evidence out exposed to the elements.

    So far the entire sum total of your "evidence" is that you can't believe it. Wow.

    And what is the point again? Oh right. So you can pretend that if the FBI lied about that then they lied about everything. Transparent as cellophane.

    And that is relevant how? Ever see a forensics team on a dig? It is a lot like an archaeological dig. They use brushes to remove as much of the dirt from the item as possible. Hard to imagine they wouldn't do that before taking a picture, right?

    Killtown is a great comedian. His stuff is always good for a laugh. That is ALL it is good for.

    Now, do you have any evidence it was planted other than your opinion or the retarded opinion of killtown?

    Wally Miller. Rejected him because he was never in the hole because it would be reported. Remember? Or the pictures. You rejected them because they were all faked. You have no evidence to back that (*)(*)(*)(*) up, but we're not suppose to notice. You rejected the thousand plus workers who worked at the site because supposedly none of them looked at anything in the hole and they all just blindly believed whatever they were told.

    All bull(*)(*)(*)(*) excuses for rejecting evidence, but that is all you have.
     
  4. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ahhh.... here we go folks! Just as predicted! He is going from "most" to "none" in a heartbeat! It was NEVER about what percentage of the plane was buried. :lol: Truthers are SO predictable.
     
  5. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    BTW, the OP's simple request still not met.

    :nana:
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The OP is a false premise.
     
  7. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    AAAAAAAND there goes suede running from addressing his now exposed agenda! :lol:
     
  8. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Maybe they did. Unfortunately they didn't take a picture of the huge pile and that seems to bother you.

    I doubt anyone missed it. I guess they should have taken appropriate pictures so that intellectual giants like killtown would not doubt the FBI.

    Where . . . Shanksvile
    How . . . with a camera
    Why is it dirt free . . . so they could identify it.

    My obsession with killtown? Aren't your 7 threads based on killtown's theory?

    So when are you going to provide some evidence for your wild and unsubstantiated claim that nothing really was?

    Why would anyone object??
     
  9. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Still seeking proof of the TONS and TONS and TONS of plane debris that was supposedly extracted from the ground.

    Anybody?

    Anybody?
     
  10. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Honestly. What is the point? You've already told us that your belief is that NOTHING was buried there and that has already been proven. Maybe not to killtown standards, but who gives a (*)(*)(*)(*) what a nutjob thinks? Neither you nor him have been able to refute the evidence that Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville, so pretending you're really just trying to prove how much was buried is just flat out dishonest.
     
  11. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Looks like that's a no.
     
  12. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why? it's by now obvious NO proof will ever satisfy you

    Such is the bane of truthers
     
  13. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Great. Sounds like your satisfied.

    Hopefully this will be the 8th and final thread on this ridiculous topic of just how much buried.
     
  14. cenydd

    cenydd Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    11,329
    Likes Received:
    236
    Trophy Points:
    63
  15. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ridiculous because you can't debunk it?
     
  16. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
  17. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There are lots of eyewitnesses you could be talking to. Do you need the numbers again?
     
  18. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What "proof" was I not satisfied with?
     
  19. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Quit being obtuse...It's plainly evident you aren't going to accept ANY proof, as you've ignored everyone's efforts to provide it

    And they have tried,so don't make out like they haven't
     
  20. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, please show me ONE INSTANCE where someone tried to show me "proof" most of 93 buried that you accuse me of "ignoring."

    Otherwise YOU are being "obtuse" by claiming I've ignored everyone's attempt at showing me, but not backing up YOUR CLAIM with direct evidence.
     
  21. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Again, stop being obtuse...you were given names and numbers so you could find out on your own....seven threads later you STILL haven't contacted them Why?
     
  22. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ah I see, first it was "it's by now obvious NO proof will ever satisfy you" and then when I CONFRONTED YOU about this, you SWITCH it to "you were given names and numbers so you could find out on your own."

    No, you're not being obtuse. :roll:
     
  23. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yet more proof than nothing is good enough for you,I'm done with this exercise in your futility
     
  24. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You were shown the tesimony of Wally Miller. You ignored it by pretending that since no reporter reported him "in the hole", that he couldn't have seen plane parts. Complete bull(*)(*)(*)(*), but that is your excuse and you're sticking to it.

    You've also been shown photographs which you poo pooed because killtown told you so. Opinion isn't a good reason to reject evidence.

    This has been brought to your attention repeatedly and you STILL sit there pretending nobody has shown you anything. :lol: Pathetic!
     
  25. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Came across this in another thread . . .

    An interesting admission.
     

Share This Page