I know, you'd think all this alleged "evidence" from these "solid sources" who gave this "evidence" to "many" that it would have been posted on the internet years ago. I think this claim is just another big L.
I didn't have anyone 'booted'. I have nothing to do with the moderation process. If you refuse to look at the source and really seek the evidence, you're simply stuck with the likes of Lazo.
Why should it be posted on the internet? To satisfy ghouls like Craig Lazo? You know a good way to find out? Ask the sources. Do you need the numbers again?
Proof is subjective and almost pointless to debate. Just ask suede. He says so himself. Lots of evidence has been posted but it has been refused. Not the same as refuted but oh well.
I've often wondered that myself. Oh for crying out loud. C'mon RWF. Are you on suede's "team"? Did he ask you to start yet another thread on this topic? Are all the truthers on a "team"? Stop with the shill bull(*)(*)(*)(*) or back it up with some proof.
It looks like Val is moving on. From this article, that ironically Craig "Killtown" Lazo linked to from his Flight 93 Photo Fraud blog, it sounds like she knows who he is, but good luck trying to contact anyone at Google/Blogger to get anything done: I provided documentation and proof that (Internet sites) violated the terms of use of the copyright, she said. But who am I to take on Google? As for off topic, the topic was a false premise excuse for a troll thread so it was never going to get back on topic anyway.
I suspect a complaint was made, but the Mod posted before checking posts. I don't recall seeing anything about a forum member's information when I checked this thread last night. No posts had been removed when Sir Thaddeus made his comment.