Slovakia: the EU's best kept secret.

Slovakia is the modern hotbed of European ultra-nationalism and racism. Slovakia is the center of the violent pan-slavic slavonic unity movements. This is because Slovakians know that they occupy a substantially large part of the Hungarian liguistic land territory, such as the cities of Kosice, Nitra, Galanta, and Bratislava. All had less than 5 % Slovakians in 1945, but now 95 %.

It would be interesting to speculate where the international interest comes from that propels this situation.

An alternative solution for Slovakia could be to recognize that Hungary was originally established over slavonic populated lands in Pannonia. This concept could then be developed into a union between Slovakia and Hungary, respecting both languages. If this kind of thinking is why slavonic groups radicalize Slovakia, then what is the desired future of the region as per the slavonic people?

 

Didn't you mention you are slovakian partly? So why does it bother you about slovakian racism against non-slovakians?


whats your motive in this thread?

And did you also mention you really are from monaco?

 

"In the middle of the 5th century, Pannonia was ceded to the Huns by Theodosius II, and after the death of Attila successively passed (entirely or partially) into the hands of the Ostrogoths (456–6th century), Lombards (530–6, Gepids (6th century), Byzantine Empire (6th century and 11th-12th century), Avars (560s – c.800), various Slavic states (Slavs living there since c. 480s; independent since 7th century), Franks (8th-9th century), Magyars (since 900/901),"

it looks like to me that "Slovaks" were the first ..., anyway, why do you guys always attacking Slovakia but Not Romania? take on smaller guy?

 

Yes, I am almost 50 % Slovakian.

BUT if I don't propose the elimination of Slovakia because of its blatant institutional racism, how can I accept the dissolution of Austria-Hungary that slavonic people say happened for the same reason? Especially that the racism of Austria-Hungary was within the 19th century context, BUT Slovakia's 19th century style racism is now going on in the 21st century context.

And all this now with INTERNATIONAL support!

The motive of this thread is to discuss this international support. Slovakia would not be able to carry on with its racist institutions and legislations in the 21st century without this current international support.

And by the way, I have already said that I am an AMERICAN of Monaco, not Monagesque.

 

Very excellent information, I think. I am aware of a Slovakian philosophical trend that uses this information to construct a framework that Slovakia and Hungary are 2 countries that share the SAME land, not 2 lands divided by a border.

This unifying ideology was brutally pushed out of Slovakian political circles in recent years. I speculate that this loss also is a result of the negative international influence.

 

you have overrated power of Slovakia´s medias. according you the Magyars was there before right? give me your links

 

I dont think he has any links. and he comes from a different background with a big biaseness against slovaks?

 

he already mentioned the magyars had only lived in the area since 9 AD ...and not anything before it. LOL

 

LOL.

I dont see any intl support of this minor issue. LOL.

If you are 50% slovakian , could you speak the language?

and you are also an american of monaco ..LOL...Is monagesque an ethnicity in monaco? just a name for an ethnicity? LOL..in monaco?

american of monaco and half slovakian and you cant stand the slovakians because they are racists against the hungarians.LOL

if i was a slovakian living in america, I wouldnt even care about the hungarians and just talk about monaco and its beaches. LOL

 

And judging by this Forum , America wins easily on a world basis .
Read the World and US sections .
The out and out racism against Jews and Muslims is dreadful .

 

yea what about palestinian rights in israel? does that ring a bell? or the slaughter of iraqi civilians by US troops? and bradley manning having to serve a million years in jail or the land of the free and brave...LOL
because he was a whistleblower?

 

No, I mentioned earlier that Slovak settlements existed in the Carpathian Basin earlier than the Hungarian entry.

By the way, Hungarian settlements existed in the territory of today's Ukraine before Slavonic settlements there.

Yes, but this gives no more right for Slovaks to claim Hungarian land such as Kaschau or Pressburg, than right for Hungarians to claim Slavonic lands (which they don't claim or have anyways).

The international support is evident, without the international support Slovakia could not legislate a financial penulty for using the Hungarian language.

I will learn the Slovakian language when the Slovakian institutions stop being overtly racist in all aspects. I speak a slavonic language a little because I took a few classes of it, and that is Russian.

The Monegasque people are the original inhabitants of Monaco. They have their own language which is not French. They are now outnumbered by the French settlers in Monaco.

This is just like Hungary used to be. In 1919, Hungarians were outnumbered by Slavs in Hungary.

It doesn't matter who was where first. What matters is that each ethnic group must respect each other. This respect was abolished in the 19th century because of the French revolution, but is being restored in the 21st century. The only country where this respect can't be restored is Slovakia, not Romania and not Voivodina (Serbia), but Slovakia.

This is why my wet dream is to take Slovakia off the map.

 

sure, try with Ukraine (the biggest European country) . this new torn look very realistic and mature to me

 

how much Hungarians respected Slavs , when they(Hungarians ) were in charge? you against the Slovakia...i will put my money on Slovakia

 

That was in the 19th century! But Slovaks do the same today in the 21st century! So Slovakia is wrong. (Slovakia may have been right in the 19th century, but now, in the 21st century, Slovakia is wrong, totally.) So go ahead put your money on the biggest racist scam of Europe, Slovakia. How long have totally racist establishments survived in history, anywhere? So, how long will Slovakia and your money last? As long as French/Russian guns will last? Is that forever?

 

what about the beaches of monaco?

 

reaD more, before post something, it has been going on for many centuries. if you were in power you´d do the same.

not just me all TNC:s choose Slovakia instead of Hungary today

"French/Russian" write more about it,

 

Well, it somewhat sucks at this time, it is only in the low 10 C's. How are the beaches of Croatia?

 

There is equally as much money in breaking up and taking over countries. From the investment banking point of view, countries are a little bit like corporations, the one with more credit swallows up the one with less credit, if you are a bullish investor. However if you are a bear market investor, your interest is to short sell the country until it breaks apart, after which you can buy back its pieces at penny price. This is what happened to Austria-Hungary, and can be done again with any of the countries of that region. The country I hate most is Slovakia and in the same time, Slovakia is the most propped up country by bullish investors. So, by the simple maths of investment strategies, Slovakia must be broken apart first. I will love that because accidentally it is Slovakia that I hate the most.

 

you are a Hungarian freak, i m sure, no one else can be so obsessed with country like Slovakia, whats about P-stan? Turkey or Nigeria?

 

HAHA Why Hungarian? Do you hate Hungarians as much as I hate Slovakians? Why is that? (Only curious.)

As for the other countries you mentioned, P-stan does not have the political stability for an investment hype. Turkey could be a Slovakia, but it is not directly controlled by the Euro, so the most you could profit out of its break-up at this time would be what you could profit out of Cyprus's break-up, which was VERY little. Nigeria IS interesting. After its historic civil war and current religious tensions between its muslim north/center and south, plus its dynamic tribal differences, Nigeria would be a VERY juicy potato in the bond trade sense ... but ... still, it hasn't yet got the inflated asset squeeze and political stability that Slovakia has. What is your opinion about Nigeria?

Also, here is a little political trivia. How was the capital city of Slovakia established? By deporting 95 % of its population in 1946, and replacing them with Slovakian herders from the mountains.

 

1 i love Hungarians (especially your girls) , but you guys can be very annoying , just drop it Slovakia will keep its territory and you can not do nothing with this
2) links plis., anyway its an usual past WW2 story

 

I am surprised that a Lithuanian says that country borders can be constant. Isn't Lithuania one of the best examples how quickly and widely country borders can shift? Even I know that in the medieval ages the borders of Lithuania reached from sea to sea, from the Baltic sea to the Black sea. Very different from Lithuania's borders today. Why would Hungary be special then in that its borders would never change?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Bratislava

This website not only discloses ethnic %'s but also notes that "After the restoration of Czechoslovakia, the Beneš decrees collectively punished ethnic German and Hungarian minorities by expropriation and deportation to Germany, Austria, and Hungary ... ". So at the end of Austria-Hungary there were 30,000 German and 30,000 Hungarian in Bratislava, and now there are 0 German and 16,000 Hungarian (half!).

It is interesting that Slavs are critical about deportations when nazis deport them, but love deportations when they deport non-Slavs. This is indicative that Slavonic people have a religious belief in their guns and that they believe that they will always have the biggest gun. Is this because the Roman Catholic church destroyed the Eastern churches by handing them to the muslims a few 100 years ago?

 

cos its 2012, not 1945.

@Slavonic people have a religious belief in their guns @

my guess that Slovaks were always Catholics or?

 

I am a Slovak, hopefully I can shed some light on the situation.

First, Slovakia is not any more nationalistic or racist than any other eastern european country. Second, the primary target is gypsies (which I can admit, are a REALLY problematic minority). Hungarians are not hated with the exception of a small minority of ultranationalist low-lifes and one barely electable politician that sometimes utters something about them to win their support. 95 % of ordinary citizens, and that includes Slovaks and Hungarians, have no hate or issues with current borders, and only desire to get on with their lives in peace.