Socialism ends in failure 100% of the time… just like democracy.

It was totalitarianism.

It was violation of the constitoon by executive fiat

The rights of the press and of the average citizen were violated through censorship

 

Goodbye , I'm not debating this with you further.

 

because you lost

I proved you wrong

 

No, you ARE wrong, that's not debatable either.

 

No I am not

You are that was proven and you know it to be true

I stated absolute facts proving you wrong and you could only spin make excuses and deny reality

 

Wow.
So, for the last 40 years no president, no congress has been able to reverse what that rascal Reagan did.

Now that right there, thats some powerful delusion is what that is.

 

I see it more as the divide widening. And by divide I'm thinking of the ultimate goal for the country.

It used to be that the left and the right wanted the same goal they just had a different idea of how to get there. Now it seems like they want different goals and they're too interested in sabotaging one another than putting aside their differences in doing what's best for the nation.

I think we'll get through it. We've been through worse.

 

@Polydectes
I agree.
We should be addressing the debt.
Failure is not an option if we are to survive.

 

The first line of my signature is 100% true.

 

Yes, come back when done.

You think people don't know what a deficit is?

Stop arguing for the sake of arguing

 

I think everyone is aware of their body counts.

Of course they do, but its ignorant as hell. Hitler attacking his "soulmate" makes all kinds of sense to them, because the "soulmate" line has been repeated over and over until they finally begun to believe it. The truth is that Nazis hated commies more than anyone. Trying to associate Hitler to any current political model doesn't make a shred of sense to anyone know knows history and understands political models.

 

And someone told you they control the Dem party

Sometimes it sounds like pseudo-cons / alt-right are joking, but they're not. They actually believe all this stuff, just like the other poster thinking Hitler and Stalin were soulmates, even though they fought the bloodiest war in human history.

 

I guess in you studies of history, you have concluded that Stalin was a good guy. He did fight with the allies in World War II after all. The fact that he was mainly out to save his own hide and to grow his evil empire had nothing to do with it. “Uncle Joe” was a humanitarian after all. There is even a guy on these boards who believes that. I’ve tangled with him now and then.

 

You guess wrong as always. He was a communist dictator and a mass murderer. What makes him a good guy in your book?

So? The alliance was useful at the time.

If you say so.

If you say so.

You tangle every time you look in the mirror

 

I don’t know what hell you are taking about. You have the two most evil dictators of the 20th century, and you are bitching because I’m putting them in the same category. If an evil dictator has you shot, torchered or imprisoned for you political opinions, he’s an anal opening. It does not matter if his label is Communist, Fascist or Nazis, it’s all the same thing. Their goals are similar as is the end result.

 

They were similar in the sense that they were both mass murdering tyrants/dictators, but you seem to have lost track of the discussion. You were arguing Germany and USSR had identical political systems, when the truth is that one was a nationalist military dictatorship, which retained businesses in private hands, while the other was a totalitarian communist country, which nationalized not only, means of production but also private property. You said they were "soulmates" when they hated each other with passion.

 

Does it matter who owns what? No. The two systems are two sides of the same coin.

 

When the discussion is about "capitalism vs socialism", its pretty much the only thing that matters. You are trying to make it about something else, so maybe we're done here.

 

Actually ALL THREE Democrat Presidents have reduced the rate of debt growth since Reagan while the Republicans have increased it. Especially tRaitor tRump who, following Reagan's lead created more debt during his term than all previous Presidents.

 

Ah. So the democrats have managed to (checks notes) reduced the rate of growth while republicans have accelerated it.
Don't think so.
Reducing the growth of the debt is no feat to brag about. Stopping and then reversing the debt is.

 

No it is obvious they control it.

All the dems have to placate those people. They have to embrace fictional ideas like white privilege. They support BLM and ignore ANTIFA.They jump on board and support every idiotic idea from feminist extremists.

As I was saying to the other guy this is one of the two main reasons why Hillary lost.

 

Who are you even referring to? You posted a link to some alt-right you-tuber and her comments somehow mean that......someone somehow controls the Dem party.

Actually don't bother. Feel free to believe the You-Tubers, Tick-Tockers and Tweeters. I don't have interest in discussing nonsense.

 

It's absolutely true. Except for the first years of President Obama's Administration, when he was battling the Great Recession left him by Dubya, The growth rate of Democrat deficits have declined, while they increased under republican administrations.

 

No I did not. She is not alt right and the content was her watching socialists talk about the very subject you asked about.
No it means thaty socialists wich to abolish the family and they DO.

The part about the far left controlling the democrat party is my own words and it is glaringly obvious. For example why did Biden declare easter a day of trans vibility? He is scared of his own party extremists turning on him more than he is all the far right people he pissed off.

When ever people complain about the trans movement here I stay out of it because im not trans and just do not care. However I occasionally read such threads without posting. Many people on the left are CORRECT when they point out that trans people are a tiny minority and nothing to worry about.

So the question is not why are so many right wingers pissed off about trannies. The question is why are the dems so hell bent on sucking up to them? It is not because they are persecuted or abused more than others. That ship has sailed and been proven wrong. It is because the extreme elements of gthe far left control the otherwise moderate democrat party and the leaders of the party are too frightened of them to dissapoint them

 

Of course she is alt-right who is in You Tube playing people like you. You can't even tell me who she is referring to, except just "them", - those behind the curtains secretly "controlling" everything. Those of us who are older have been listening to the same nonsense in various forms for decades.

"Abolish the family".......LOL How many decades have we been listening to people like her going on about "them" trying to "tear the moral fabric of the nation".

Where is your moral fabric when you promote whore-chasing, lying, *****-grabbers for the WH?

You have been played.

Because your political leaders and media talking heads can't stop talking about them as if they were the greatest evil since Hitler.