First of all, 100% of the evidence is NOT available to the public at large and additionally much of the evidence that is available has been tampered with. so NO there is no logical reason for saying that 100% of the evidence is readily available. The evidence that is available, indicates all sorts of problematic bits such as the "collapse" events of WTC1, 2 & 7 the non-recovery of the flight data recorders for the most certainly fake "FLT11" & "FLT175" The fact that not one of the airliners had an inventory of bits done so as to know precisely how much of said aircraft was recovered. The Pentagon hit is a complete & total JOKE, where is the airliner? the small quantity of bits on the Pentagon lawn, are you really buying this fiasco? The fact that even after it was known for certain that AMERICA was under attack, the President sat in a publicly known location ( for terrorists to crash a plane into the school where he sat? ) Underfunding of the "investigation", the group that was set up to fail..... ( etc ... ) the evidence points to a huge cover-up of something, what are the politicians hiding? This is far from a coherent lot of evidence that points to hijacked airliners being used as weapons. Question EVERYTHING A! where are we going & why are we in this handbasket?
My "incredulity" post includes facts that can not be brushed aside. the fact that the flight recorders from the alleged "FLT11" & "FLT175" were not only never found, but no piece identified as a bit of any of those recorders was found. in a process that sorted out peoples rings & watches from the rubble, a piece of an electronic assembly was missed? more likely, the flight recorders never existed because the flights were fake. also the claim that the evidence is 100% available, and that ALL of said evidence points to the hijacked airliners scenario. Lets get real here, when in all of the history of court cases, has there been a prosecution with 100% of the evidence known, and 100% of the evidence, points directly at one suspect? there are going to be anomalies. and the Defense & Prosecution both need to recognize & deal with it.
Um no. Flight recorders are designed to survive most typical crashes. Crashing into a building is not typical. Also crashes are all unique no two are alike and bizarre differences often exist. It points to no such thing as the flights being faked especially when passengers were communicating with others up until the crash. That fact alone destroys your claim. The fact that there are always anomalies works against you not for you.
You have a very bazaar standard for evidence: "That fact alone destroys your claim." I assume you mean in reference to the phone calls and really the phone calls are among the least compelling bits of the "evidence" to be had in all of this. they are too easily faked and given the technology of even attempting a cell phone call from an aircraft that is moving at ~500 mph, this is much more than "incredulity" this is scientifically proven data of cell phones not working at all at 500 mph or at higher altitudes. The REAL evidence and data would have to come in the form of tangible articles such as aircraft parts, flight recorders, ( etc..... ) and again, these bits are lacking and we get excuses for why these things are not present, but the whole story hinges on a whole string of "it could happen like that" sorts of events that are implausible/improbable and so what are we left with? The fact that a total of 4 airliners allegedly crashed that day and all 4 conveniently left behind only token remnant of an aircraft, is quite remarkable, don't you think?
Exactly how much documented tangible evidence exists to confirm the existence of any of the 4 flights that were allegedly hijacked & crashed?
Ask the airlines.everything not relegated to museums was returned to them. And they existed people on them DIED
The airlines have it is an excuse, what about photographs & documentation of the aircraft wreckage before it was handed over to the airlines? Most poorly documented disaster ...... oh well......
Have you bothered to ask anyone? And there would be NO reason to 'photograph' the wreckage,they KNEW where the parts came from...
Says who again? Numerous books of photographs have been published about 9/11 the cleanup was a major story for MONTHS on the local and national media So much for 'poorly documented'
Keep trolling for he has a good point. Knowing of an organized attack, the president did not rush out of that place. According to Bush himself, they didn't know how many airliners were highjacked, nor who the attacker was at that moment. As Bob says, the Secret Service would rush the president out of a live broadcast knowing that the United States itself is being attacked by some unidentified party, with the natural assumption that this party might have the means to redirect the attack in real time towards that school.
Hmmm... I don't suppose you could provide a list of 5 disasters that were documented better so we can see what you're comparing this to?
There were much better documented terrorist attacks: Utoya Island/Oslo London subway Spain (2002) Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 crash And the one that just happened in Ukraine: http://www.euronews.com/2014/07/22/mh17-flight-recorders-are-handed-over-by-ukrainian-rebels/
So because they had the flight recorders, that means better documentation? I guess the FEAs, how many thousands of photographs, NIST reports, eyewitness reports, videos, news reporting, radar data, engineering data, metallurgical studies done on the beams (showing eutectic reactions), dust studies, etc. Means that it was not documented as well as those others? You're kidding right?
The Pentagon crash and the Shanksville ghost plane. Ask whether they were well documented and it becomes a joke indeed. What videos do we have from the Pentagon (the most secure military building in the world) apart from a video as blurry as some UFO pictures?
So your criteria for 'documentation' includes video of the event happening?.. And what's this 'most secure military building in the world' nonsense...The INSIDE may be secure,but the outside is in the flight path of Reagan airport...
How about documentation that includes but not limited to: Photographer stands at the north-east corner of ground zero and looks due west and shoots a picture, takes notes as to where the pix was taken from, and time of day ( etc.... ) moves to another location maybe 100ft south of the first one and shoots another pix and again documents the time/date and where the camera was pointing. ( this would have to be done as soon after the collapse event as possible to make sure to get the evidence while the site was in the same condition as caused by the "collapse" in the first place ) THIS is the essence of evidence gathering, there are a multitude of pictures, most shot after the clean-up effort had gotten underway and so are for the most part, useless for knowing bits about the rubble pile & what can be learned from the way things fell and what the steel looked like before the heavy equipment moved in to clear the site.
assuming NOTHING the fact is that after a building "collapse" event such as was just happened, there would be a story to tell and a good bit of that INFORMATION, would be contained in the rubble pile, in the order than things fell into in the collapse event, in the things that could be seen, and indeed not seen, as in you don't find a chair, a desk, a computer, a telephone, the largest single bit of a telephone that one of the first responders reported seeing was less than 3" across. & no doorknobs either, where did all the stuff go? Pictures would help to tell the story, because at this stage of the game, we have so little INFORMATION that its no wonder that the debate rages on.
