Study on antibodies proving Covid jab might kill us eventually.

Discussion in 'Viral/Biological' started by CV70, Jul 22, 2021.

PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening. We urge you to seek reliable alternate sources to verify information you read in this forum.

  1. CV70

    CV70 Newly Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2021
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    What do you think? Now that they are trying to inject this into children we have to fight back hard.

    https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242430

    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.07.21253098v2

    "
    1. You take the shot.

    2. You get both protective (good) and non-protective (neutral) or possibly enhancing (very bad), antibodies.

    3. The protective antibodies are enough to prevent you from getting seriously sick or dying. We all cheer, and all appears to be well in the world. The results look good -- for a while.

    4. Over time the antibody titer wanes. Now you don't have enough neutralizing antibodies but still have some of the bad ones which, if you get infected, make it materially more-likely the infection will kill you.

    5. Then in comes the nice pharma dude who tells you to take this booster shot, which by the way isn't free and for which the price goes up every year, irrespective of the side effects which are real and remain (and might kill or seriously disable, and which risk you must accept every year forever into the future), or you're very likely to die because the virus is still out there and all you have are the bad antibodies that make an infection worse. While those too will wane over time it may take years before you're back to where you started before the stab in terms of risk."
     
    DennisTate and Matthewthf like this.
  2. CV70

    CV70 Newly Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2021
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
  3. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,009
    Likes Received:
    11,905
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What is true is that censorship abounds. Those good and conscientious doctors like America's Frontline Doctors are censored and maligned by the media.

    That is a strong clue that shenanigans are going on. Since the beginning the data has been manipulated. The PCR tests are not meant to be used for diagnostic purposes, yet the government has used them for diagnostic purposes. Another strong clue as to malfeasance and dishonesty.

    The shots are dangerous, killing thousands and maiming more. They protect nobody from the virus, they do not confer immunity.
     
  4. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,366
    Likes Received:
    879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2021
    DennisTate, Eleuthera and Matthewthf like this.
  5. joesnagg

    joesnagg Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2020
    Messages:
    4,749
    Likes Received:
    6,801
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ha,ha....I asked my doctor at my last visit that since I'd had a two day "spell" of a painful dry hacking cough and mild fever the previous month should I take the test to see if I had had Covid....she just laughed and said it was a waste of time due the tests inaccuracy.
     
    DennisTate, Matthewthf and Eleuthera like this.
  6. Melb_muser

    Melb_muser Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2020
    Messages:
    11,154
    Likes Received:
    11,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What about all the other conspiracies that didn't end up being true. Why aren't we talking about them?
     
  7. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    94,189
    Likes Received:
    75,275
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    A whacky conspiracy site and

    :roll: mine tinks it bulltwang!
     
  8. Melb_muser

    Melb_muser Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2020
    Messages:
    11,154
    Likes Received:
    11,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Did you ask her if that includes gold-standard reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, (PCR) tests?

    [It sounds like it was too long ago anyhow... Can't believe you didn't get tested then!]
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  9. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    94,189
    Likes Received:
    75,275
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Yeah! What about the moon being green cheese conspiracy and and and the Easter Bunny Rabbit and and and Santa Claus!!
     
    Melb_muser likes this.
  10. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    94,189
    Likes Received:
    75,275
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    No the Daily fail got it’s nickname for a reason and the other is telling us basically we may need a third shot NEITHER is peer reviewed science
     
  11. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You understand the science? LOL
     
    DennisTate likes this.
  12. FatBack

    FatBack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    54,244
    Likes Received:
    50,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Remember, these are the folks who tell us gender is a 'spectrum'....

    Many of them truly ARE on the spectrum!
     
  13. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,366
    Likes Received:
    879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Check out this info on peer-review.
    http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-lies-furiously.583345/page-2#post-1072652969
    http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-lies-furiously.583345/page-2#post-1072771889

    The same liars that control our info on history and the news control peer-review.
    http://politicalforum.com/index.php...at-the-lies-furiously.583345/#post-1072353798

    If it's from the mainstream, consider it to be a lie until it's proven true and something's having been peer-reviewed isn't proof that it's true.


    The point I was making was that an establishment institute seemed to let slip something that wasn't meant for the public. The censors were probably drinking too much coffee that day and it got by them.

    A lot of objective doctors and scientists say the vaccine will probably kill us by ADE*.
    http://politicalforum.com/index.php...rlds-population.587240/page-3#post-1072800122


    *
    https://www.globalresearch.ca/search?q=antibody-dependent+enhancement&x=10&y=8
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2021
    DennisTate likes this.
  14. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,009
    Likes Received:
    11,905
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's nice to know there are a few conscientious and honest doctors out there. I'm due for my annual exam on 3 August. I doubt there will be any pressure, but if there is I will be moving on.
     
    DennisTate likes this.
  15. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,366
    Likes Received:
    879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    DennisTate likes this.
  16. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,366
    Likes Received:
    879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    DennisTate and Eleuthera like this.
  17. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,414
    Likes Received:
    853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Both your sources are contradicting each other in their cherry picked data. What should you do? Stop listening to fringe lunatics. The opening post highlights NOT the actual study but a foolish interpretation of one sentence within it! The rest of the abstract has much closer detail to the crux of the study found HERE:

    "Neutralizing activity of NTD mAbs but not RBD mAbs against a clinical viral isolate carrying E484K as well as extensive changes in the NTD was abolished, suggesting that a proportion of vaccine-induced RBD binding antibodies may provide substantial protection against viral variants carrying single E484K RBD mutations."
     
  18. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,414
    Likes Received:
    853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    From a doctor specialising in chiropractics and acupuncture! His opening remark cites some unreferenced study that said vaccine reactions were under reported in 2008/9/10 therefore it must be true of 2020/21?

    What utter stupidity to be taken in by a) Alex Jones the clown b) a doctor who has no direct viral qualification c) has an axe to grind against the establishment from the death of his father d) gives no reference to his citation e) a citation that is not even relevant!

    Scott/cosmored - when oh when will you ever stop posting horseshit and actually get educated!?
     
  19. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,366
    Likes Received:
    879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    DennisTate and Eleuthera like this.
  20. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,414
    Likes Received:
    853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why? You routinely post crap without detailing anything! The viewers may wish to know why you so gullibly suck up this kind of hogwash.

    The uploader shares in this revenue. There's a big clue for you!
     
  21. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,366
    Likes Received:
    879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The comment sections of this site are a good read.
    https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242430#discuss

    I've never seen so many sensible intelligent people in the same place.

    Here's a hotlink I found somewhere in there.
    https://www.fsmb.org/advocacy/news-...sinformation-may-put-medical-license-at-risk/

    This is why so many doctors don't speak out.

    (excerpt)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    “Physicians who generate and spread COVID-19 vaccine misinformation or disinformation are risking disciplinary action by state medical boards, including the suspension or revocation of their medical license. Due to their specialized knowledge and training, licensed physicians possess a high degree of public trust and therefore have a powerful platform in society, whether they recognize it or not. They also have an ethical and professional responsibility to practice medicine in the best interests of their patients and must share information that is factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven for the betterment of public health. Spreading inaccurate COVID-19 vaccine information contradicts that responsibility, threatens to further erode public trust in the medical profession and puts all patients at risk.”
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The people who decide what misinformation is are all corrupt. The truth is classed as misinformation.
     
    DennisTate likes this.
  22. MJ Davies

    MJ Davies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2020
    Messages:
    21,120
    Likes Received:
    20,249
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That and there is no specific treatment for COVID unless it's bad enough for a person to be hospitalized. I tested positive in November (I think it was a false positive because I had NO risk factors or exposure) and my doctor and the Health Department representative told me to self-quarantine for 14 days and go to the ER if I developed symptoms. I was asymptomatic the whole time.

    I talked to a guy yesterday who was kind of freaking out because he had to go to the ER. The discharge paperwork had "There is no treatment for COVID at this time" which made him more paranoid about the vaccine. So, now he's running around screaming like a madman because it's right there in print. I don't have any recollection of the vaccines as being sold as a panacea.
     
  23. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,414
    Likes Received:
    853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How would you know?

    Meh. How would you know!

    This is why so many doctors don't speak out.

    They also have an ethical and professional responsibility to practice medicine in the best interests of their patients and must share information that is factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven for the betterment of public health. Spreading inaccurate COVID-19 vaccine information contradicts that responsibility, threatens to further erode public trust in the medical profession and puts all patients at risk.”[/QUOTE]

    Works for me. The problem lies in you believing the fringe and ignoring every one else in every single case.

    Prove it.

    Nope. YOUR batshit is classed as misinformation.
     
  24. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,366
    Likes Received:
    879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    DennisTate and MJ Davies like this.
  25. MJ Davies

    MJ Davies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2020
    Messages:
    21,120
    Likes Received:
    20,249
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It doesn't really matter what different doctors say because they all have to follow the CDC guidelines and the Health Department in their state. A person is not going to get a different "treatment" from an AMA doctor just like one wouldn't get different recommendations from a dentist (they might try to upsell some stuff but the basic problem is diagnosed and treated the same no matter who you go to). The rest of it is just bedside manner.

    The doctors that operate outside that scope have usually walked away from the pecking order roles and branched out on their own. They will always get a bad rap because it's in the AMA's best interest to keep people seeing their doctors. Some of them are quacks but some of them aren't. Dr. Mercola gets a really bad rap around here but he was very helpful to me when I almost died from a vaccine injury in college. I also prefer natural and homeopathic solutions over allopathic medicine which often brings another set of health problems. I've seen at least ten doctors who were highly recommended by friends and I didn't care for any of them. I've recommended doctors to friends who haven't like them. It's a personal choice and one size doesn't fit all.

    I think at the end of the day people have to do their own work to find what works best for them and forget about the rest of it.
     

Share This Page