Study on antibodies proving Covid jab might kill us eventually.

What do you think? Now that they are trying to inject this into children we have to fight back hard.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242430

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.07.21253098v2

"
1. You take the shot.

2. You get both protective (good) and non-protective (neutral) or possibly enhancing (very bad), antibodies.

3. The protective antibodies are enough to prevent you from getting seriously sick or dying. We all cheer, and all appears to be well in the world. The results look good -- for a while.

4. Over time the antibody titer wanes. Now you don't have enough neutralizing antibodies but still have some of the bad ones which, if you get infected, make it materially more-likely the infection will kill you.

5. Then in comes the nice pharma dude who tells you to take this booster shot, which by the way isn't free and for which the price goes up every year, irrespective of the side effects which are real and remain (and might kill or seriously disable, and which risk you must accept every year forever into the future), or you're very likely to die because the virus is still out there and all you have are the bad antibodies that make an infection worse. While those too will wane over time it may take years before you're back to where you started before the stab in terms of risk."

 

Here is a professor also warning for over reaction in the immune system. The first half of the video are good news.

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/quot...rofessor-sucharit-bhakdi_895vxLrSVgHYH7y.html

Why should we not listen to professors like these? Is this professor completely wrong? I have seen many doctors and scientists who warn but they are silenced.

I have no idea what is true.

 

What is true is that censorship abounds. Those good and conscientious doctors like America's Frontline Doctors are censored and maligned by the media.

That is a strong clue that shenanigans are going on. Since the beginning the data has been manipulated. The PCR tests are not meant to be used for diagnostic purposes, yet the government has used them for diagnostic purposes. Another strong clue as to malfeasance and dishonesty.

The shots are dangerous, killing thousands and maiming more. They protect nobody from the virus, they do not confer immunity.

 

Two links to the same video:

Coronavirus: Dr David Bauer interview / Francis Crick Institute GVs
https://www.gettyimages.in/detail/v...s-crick-institute-gvs-news-footage/1325046154

Dr. David Bauer: "Pfizer vaccine produce fewer key antibodies"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/c...er-vaccine-produces-fewer-key-antibodies.html


Those are establishment info sources. I would think this info would get censored out.

 

Ha,ha....I asked my doctor at my last visit that since I'd had a two day "spell" of a painful dry hacking cough and mild fever the previous month should I take the test to see if I had had Covid....she just laughed and said it was a waste of time due the tests inaccuracy.

 

What about all the other conspiracies that didn't end up being true. Why aren't we talking about them?

 

A whacky conspiracy site and

mine tinks it bulltwang!

 

Did you ask her if that includes gold-standard reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, (PCR) tests?

[It sounds like it was too long ago anyhow... Can't believe you didn't get tested then!]

 

Yeah! What about the moon being green cheese conspiracy and and and the Easter Bunny Rabbit and and and Santa Claus!!

 

No the Daily fail got it’s nickname for a reason and the other is telling us basically we may need a third shot NEITHER is peer reviewed science

 

You understand the science? LOL

 

Remember, these are the folks who tell us gender is a 'spectrum'....

Many of them truly ARE on the spectrum!

 

Check out this info on peer-review.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-lies-furiously.583345/page-2#post-1072652969
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-lies-furiously.583345/page-2#post-1072771889

The same liars that control our info on history and the news control peer-review.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...at-the-lies-furiously.583345/#post-1072353798

If it's from the mainstream, consider it to be a lie until it's proven true and something's having been peer-reviewed isn't proof that it's true.


The point I was making was that an establishment institute seemed to let slip something that wasn't meant for the public. The censors were probably drinking too much coffee that day and it got by them.

A lot of objective doctors and scientists say the vaccine will probably kill us by ADE*.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...rlds-population.587240/page-3#post-1072800122


*
https://www.globalresearch.ca/search?q=antibody-dependent+enhancement&x=10&y=8

 

It's nice to know there are a few conscientious and honest doctors out there. I'm due for my annual exam on 3 August. I doubt there will be any pressure, but if there is I will be moving on.

 

Here's something else on ADE that goes into more detail.

Is a Coronavirus Vaccine a Ticking Time Bomb? | Aletho News
https://survivaltricks.wordpress.co...irus-vaccine-a-ticking-time-bomb-aletho-news/

 

This video deals with a lot of stuff including antibodies.

Doctor Exposing Massive Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths Gives Update on Lawsuit
https://banned.video/watch?id=60fb53e808b4e30ba06ed1ce

 

Both your sources are contradicting each other in their cherry picked data. What should you do? Stop listening to fringe lunatics. The opening post highlights NOT the actual study but a foolish interpretation of one sentence within it! The rest of the abstract has much closer detail to the crux of the study found HERE:

"Neutralizing activity of NTD mAbs but not RBD mAbs against a clinical viral isolate carrying E484K as well as extensive changes in the NTD was abolished, suggesting that a proportion of vaccine-induced RBD binding antibodies may provide substantial protection against viral variants carrying single E484K RBD mutations."

 

From a doctor specialising in chiropractics and acupuncture! His opening remark cites some unreferenced study that said vaccine reactions were under reported in 2008/9/10 therefore it must be true of 2020/21?

What utter stupidity to be taken in by a) Alex Jones the clown b) a doctor who has no direct viral qualification c) has an axe to grind against the establishment from the death of his father d) gives no reference to his citation e) a citation that is not even relevant!

Scott/cosmored - when oh when will you ever stop posting horseshit and actually get educated!?

 

I've only watched the first ten minutes of this but I'm posting it anyway.

Vaccine Mutations: Devastating Side-effects Crippling, Mutilating All Americans – Ledger Report 1139
https://rumble.com/vjn78x-vaccine-m...effects-crippling-mutilating-all-america.html


There's a long ad at the beginning.

 

Why? You routinely post crap without detailing anything! The viewers may wish to know why you so gullibly suck up this kind of hogwash.

The uploader shares in this revenue. There's a big clue for you!

 

The comment sections of this site are a good read.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242430#discuss

I've never seen so many sensible intelligent people in the same place.

Here's a hotlink I found somewhere in there.
https://www.fsmb.org/advocacy/news-...sinformation-may-put-medical-license-at-risk/

This is why so many doctors don't speak out.

(excerpt)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Physicians who generate and spread COVID-19 vaccine misinformation or disinformation are risking disciplinary action by state medical boards, including the suspension or revocation of their medical license. Due to their specialized knowledge and training, licensed physicians possess a high degree of public trust and therefore have a powerful platform in society, whether they recognize it or not. They also have an ethical and professional responsibility to practice medicine in the best interests of their patients and must share information that is factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven for the betterment of public health. Spreading inaccurate COVID-19 vaccine information contradicts that responsibility, threatens to further erode public trust in the medical profession and puts all patients at risk.”
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The people who decide what misinformation is are all corrupt. The truth is classed as misinformation.

 

That and there is no specific treatment for COVID unless it's bad enough for a person to be hospitalized. I tested positive in November (I think it was a false positive because I had NO risk factors or exposure) and my doctor and the Health Department representative told me to self-quarantine for 14 days and go to the ER if I developed symptoms. I was asymptomatic the whole time.

I talked to a guy yesterday who was kind of freaking out because he had to go to the ER. The discharge paperwork had "There is no treatment for COVID at this time" which made him more paranoid about the vaccine. So, now he's running around screaming like a madman because it's right there in print. I don't have any recollection of the vaccines as being sold as a panacea.

 

How would you know?

Meh. How would you know!

This is why so many doctors don't speak out.

They also have an ethical and professional responsibility to practice medicine in the best interests of their patients and must share information that is factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven for the betterment of public health. Spreading inaccurate COVID-19 vaccine information contradicts that responsibility, threatens to further erode public trust in the medical profession and puts all patients at risk.”[/QUOTE]

Works for me. The problem lies in you believing the fringe and ignoring every one else in every single case.

Prove it.

Nope. YOUR batshit is classed as misinformation.

 

A lot of doctors say different things. Some say they've had success at treating it and the treatment they've used is vilified by the mainstream.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-covid-patients.584669/page-2#post-1072651080
http://politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/ivermectin-has-good-results-in-zimbabwe.589339/

 

It doesn't really matter what different doctors say because they all have to follow the CDC guidelines and the Health Department in their state. A person is not going to get a different "treatment" from an AMA doctor just like one wouldn't get different recommendations from a dentist (they might try to upsell some stuff but the basic problem is diagnosed and treated the same no matter who you go to). The rest of it is just bedside manner.

The doctors that operate outside that scope have usually walked away from the pecking order roles and branched out on their own. They will always get a bad rap because it's in the AMA's best interest to keep people seeing their doctors. Some of them are quacks but some of them aren't. Dr. Mercola gets a really bad rap around here but he was very helpful to me when I almost died from a vaccine injury in college. I also prefer natural and homeopathic solutions over allopathic medicine which often brings another set of health problems. I've seen at least ten doctors who were highly recommended by friends and I didn't care for any of them. I've recommended doctors to friends who haven't like them. It's a personal choice and one size doesn't fit all.

I think at the end of the day people have to do their own work to find what works best for them and forget about the rest of it.