Support for gay marriage has fallen after Obergefell

Many people are irresponsible, but its gay irresponsibility that passes on HIV.

 

Just no where near the issue that men having sex with men is the issue.

 

That isn't really the issue.

- - - Updated - - -

Irresponsibility has no sexual orientation.

 

Tell that to the people who acquired HIV.

 

HIV is a male disease.

- - - Updated - - -

What issue? HIV is a male disease. A couple of generations of women not having sex with men would essentially end it. They could just use HIV tested sperm from sperm banks until science eliminates the need for men all together to have children - which is only a few years off.

War also is a male disease.

 

They know better than anybody that it was a responsibility issue.

 

FORTY times the issue that irresponsible promiscuity between heterosexuals is the issue

 

And most gays are not irresponsible. So it is not a gay disease. Being a homosexual doesn't mean you will get HIV.

BTW are you saying heterosexual irresponsible promiscuity CANNOT pass on HIV?

- - - Updated - - -

And that is due to irresponsible promiscuity. If a person is born homosexual, they are not at a higher risk for getting HIV based on their orientation alone. Therefore, no matter what bovine excrement you and Battle try to spew, it isn't a gay disease. Even Battle got caught up and flat out admitted it wasn't.

 

1/40th of the risk is due to irresponsible promiscuity. The other 39/40ths is due to men having sex with men.

 

1/40th the risk huh? Yeah you go have heterosexual sex in Los Angeles unprotected and then have a gay man have unprotected sex in Kansas. You want to live by that 1/40th risk? Go right on ahead.

The thing about 1/40th figures like you post is they don't represent reality of location. The simple fact is irresponsible sex, whether homosexual or heterosexual puts you at risk. You can have fun pointing at numbers but I am right and it isn't a homosexual disease.

Chew on that dix.

 

All else being equal, OF COURSE.

 

Homosexuality is a correlation, not a causation.

 

Wow you have found a correlation. It however isn't a causation.

 

No one claimed either way.

 

Yeah, its the rampant irresponsible promiscuity that the gays engage in.

 

Well if being homosexual doesn't cause the illness, it's not becausethey are homosexual than is it?

- - - Updated - - -

Which gays?

 

HIV is a male disease. Men should never have sex and women should only have sex with each other.

 

Again, which gays?

 

HIV is a male disease due to irresponsibility of men.

 

Why can't you answer my question? It's simple

 

No. No one claimed it does.

 

No, No one claimed it does. I usually ignore your dashes for refuge in a strawman. No one claimed being homosexual causes them to be promiscuous, they simply are more promiscuous than heterosexuals. No ne claims being homosexual causes them not to use protection, they simply are more likely to not use protection. No one claims being a male homosexual causes them to want a boner up their butt, they simply are more likely to want a boner up their butt.

 

You may not have but someone else did.

LOL you don't know what a strawman is.

Someone did.

I don't really know how you could know that.

You can't possibly knowthat either.

 

So direct your whining towards them. I don't read every post from every poster. Your question directed TO ME is a strawman.

Surveys show this to be fact.

 

Which surveys?